Ramírez PB, Altamirano GB, Martínez SS, Morales LH.

Language: Spanish
References: 15
Page: 48-51
PDF size: 53.31 Kb.

ABSTRACT

Objective: To determine knowledge about emergency contraception (EC) in a group of family physicians in Mexico City. Design: Descriptive and cross sectional study. Material and methods: A questionnaire on EC was designed to be answered by family physicians. It was applied at Family Practice Center (FPC) depending from the General Hospital in San Angel, Mexico City; which were previously authorized by the manager of each FPC and by the inquired physician. The information was estimated by using percentages. Results: 93 family physicians from five FPC were inquired. 91.4% had heard about PC; 15% know the right dose; 8.6% thought that EC acted dislodging the implanted egg (abortive mechanism); 44.1% know that the timing for EC is 72 hours after intercourse and 19.3% considered that its efficiency to prevent pregnancy is 75%. The most common methods for EC were the use of medroxiprogesterone/estradiol and noretisterone/ethinilestradiol. Conclusions: Level of knowledge about EC is low among physicians although there is willingness to employ it. Contraindications and legal issues are points to which attention should be paid in order to build up educational strategies.

REFERENCES

1. Henshaw SK. Unintended pregnancy in the United States. Family Planning Perspectives 1998; 30: 24-29.

2. Langer A. Emergency contraception in Mexico City: What do health care providers and potential users know and think about it? Contraception 1999; 60: 233-241.

3. Alan Guttmacher Institute. Clandestine abortion: A Latin American reality. New York: Alan Guttmacher Institute, 1994.

4. La mujer adolescente, adulta, anciana y su salud. Secretaría de Salud, Dirección General de Salud Materno Infantil, México, 1992.

5. Kubicka L, Matejecek Z, David HP, Dytrych Z, Miller WB, Roth Z. Children from unwanted pregnancies in Prague, Czech Republic revisited at age thirty. Acta Psychiatrica Scandinavica 1995; 91: 361-369.

6. Yuzpe AA, Lance WJ. Ethinilestradiol and DL-norgestrel as a postcoital contraceptive. Fertility & Sterility 1977; 28: 932-936.

7. Galvao L. Anticoncepción de emergencia: Conocimiento, actitudes y prácticas de los Gineco-obstetras del Brasil. Perspectivas Internacionales en Planificación Familiar, número especial de 2000: 2-6.

8. Delbanco SF. Little knowledge and limited practice: Emergency contraceptive pills, the public, and the Obstetrician-Gynecologist. Obstetrics & Gynecology 2997; 89: 1006-1011.

9. Muia E. Emergency contraception in Nairobi, Kenya: Knowledge, attitudes and practices among policymakers, family planning providers an clients, and university students. Contraception 1999; 60: 223-232.

10. Jackson R. Knowledge and willingness to use emergency contraception among low-income post-partum women. Contraception 2000; 61: 351-357.

11. Kosunen E, Sihvo S, Hemminki E. Knowledge and use of hormonal emergency contraception in Finland. Contraception 1997; 55: 153-157.

12. Glasier A. Case studies in emergency contraception from six countries. International Family Planning Perspectives 1996; 22: 57-61.

13. Hatcher RA. Emergency contraception: The nation’s best kept secret. Decatur GA. Bridging the Gap Communications, 1995.

14. Ellertson C. Shochet T, Blanchard K, Trussel J. Emergency contraception: A review of the programmatic and social science literature. Contraception 2000; 61: 145-186.

15. Bird ST, Harvey SM, Beckman LJ. Emergency contraceptive pills: an exploratory study of knowledge and perceptions among Mexican women from both sides of the border. Journal of the American Medical Women’s Association 1998; 53 (supplement 2): 262-265.