medigraphic.com
ISSN 2992-8036 (Electronic)
ISSN 2306-4102 (Print)
Órgano Oficial del Colegio Mexicano de Ortopedia y Traumatología

2019, Number 6

<< Back Next >>

Acta Ortop Mex 2019; 33 (6)

Hallux metatarsophalangeal arthrodesis: retrospective comparison between blocked plate and cannulated screws

Martínez‑García A, Arvinius C, Checa‑Betegón P, del Pozo‑Martin R, Manrique‑Gamo E, Galeote‑Rodríguez JE

Language: Spanish
References: 14
Page: 391-394
PDF size: 140.31 Kb.


ABSTRACT

Introduction: There are multiple methods and implants used for the metatarsophalangeal arthrodesis of hallux without evidence in favor of one or the other in the bibliography. The goal was to compare the clinical and radiological results of 2 methods and implants used in our center. Material and methods: Retrospective review of 37 feet between 2013 and 2017 (22 feet by plate and 15 by cannulated screws). Clinical and radiological variables were collected and the AOFAS and Manchester-Oxford scales were applied. Variables were studied descriptively and analytically through the SPSSv15 program. Results: The group intervened by plate was composed of 77% of women, with an average age of 65 years and a distribution by diagnosis of severe hallux valgus (HV) (36%), hallux valgus relapse (HVR) (36%) and hallux rigidus (HR) (28%), compared to 80% of women, 68 years old and HV (34%), HVR (46%) HR (20%) in the group of cannulated screws. No significant differences were found in the correction of angles for HV or HVR. The rate of painful pseudoarthrosis was 13% in both and the re-intervention was 18% in the plate group and 26% in the screw group. Both the AOFAS and M-O scales were better in the plate group 63.8 vs 52.6 (p = 0.07); 30.1 vs 41.0 (p = 0.10); as well as patient satisfaction 86% vs 66% (p › 0.05) and postoperative pain 3.68 vs 5.58 (p › 0.05). Conclusion: Small study groups, not implant randomization, both options are functional without being able to find a preferred one.


REFERENCES

  1. Stevens J, de Bot RT, Hermus J, van Rhijn L, Witlox A. Outcome following total joint replacement and arthrodesis for hallux rigidus: a systematic review. JBJS Rev. 2017; 5(11): e2.

  2. Moon JL, McGlamry MC. First metatarsophalangeal joint arthrodesis: current fixation options. Clin Podiatr Med Surg. 2011; 28(2): 405-19.

  3. Bauer T, Lortat-Jacob A, Hardy P. First metatarsophalangeal joint percutaneous arthrodesis. Orthop Traumatol Surg Res. 2010; 96(5): 567-73.

  4. Treadwell JR. First metatarsophalangeal joint arthrodesis; what is the best fixation option? a critical review of the literature. Clin Podiatr Med Surg. 2013; 30(3): 327-49.

  5. Harris E, Moroney P, Tourné Y. Arthrodesis of the first metatarsophalangeal joint: a biomechanical comparison of four fixation techniques. Foot Ankle Surg. 2017; 23(4): 268-74.

  6. Claassen L, Plaass C, Pastor MF, Ettinger S, Wellmann M, Stukenborg-Colsman C, et al. First metatarsophalangeal joint arthrodesis: a retrospective comparison of crossed-screws, locking and non-locking plate fixation with lag screw. Arch Bone Jt Surg. 2017; 5(4): 221-25.

  7. Bei C, Gross C, Adams S, Parekh S. Dual plating with bone block arthrodesis of the first metatarsophalangeal joint: A clinical retrospective review. Foot Ankle Surg. 2015; 21(4): 235-9.

  8. Asif M, Kassim S. Kannan S. A consecutive case series of 166 first metatarsophalangeal joint fusions using a combination of cup and cone reamers and crossed cannulated screws. J Foot Ankle Surg. 2018; 57(3): 462-5.

  9. Donegan RJ, Blume PA. Functional results and patient satisfaction of first metatarsophalangeal joint arthrodesis using dual crossed screw fixation. J Foot Ankle Surg. 2017; 56(2): 291-7.

  10. Dening J, van Erve RH. Arthrodesis of the first metatarsophalangeal joint: a retrospective analysis of plate versus screw fixation. J Foot Ankle Surg. 2012; 51(2): 172-5.

  11. Bass EJ, Sirikonda SP. 1st metatarsophalangeal joint fusion: a comparison of non-union and gender differences between locking and non-locking plating systems. Foot (Edinb). 2015; 25(4): 195-9.

  12. Dalat F, Cottalorda F, Fessy MH, Besse JL. Does arthrodesis of the first metatarsophalangeal joint correct the intermetatarsal M1M2angle? Analysis of a continuous series of 208 arthrodeses fixed with plates. Orthop Traumatol Surg Res. 2015; 101(6): 709-14.

  13. Wanivenhaus F, Espinosa N, Tscholl PM, Krause F, Wirth SH. Quality of early union after first metatarsophalangeal joint arthrodesis. J Foot Ankle Surg. 2017; 56(1): 50-3.

  14. Rammelt S, Panzner I, Mittlmeier T. Metatarsophalangeal joint fusion: why and how? Foot Ankle Clin. 2015; 20(3): 465-77.




2020     |     www.medigraphic.com