Hernández-Castro F, Laredo-Rodríguez A, Hernández-Herrera R

Language: Spanish
References: 13
Page: 309-312
PDF size: 81.32 Kb.

ABSTRACT

Introduction: Several clinical methods have been used to follow up fetal growth, mainly based in uterine enlargement. Ultrasound (US) is nowadays the main tool to evaluate fetal growth; however, is not widely available. Thus, we decided to evaluate the Johnson and Toshach method (JTM) to predict newborns weight on clinical basis.
Objective: to evaluate the sensitivity and positive predictive value of the JTM. We selected 132 women with single term pregnancies whose gestational age was previously confirmed by US, and followed the method described by JTM. At the end of pregnancies by delivery or cesarean section, we compared our estimations with the newborn infants weight. In order to avoid bias, only women whose pregnancies ended in the following 72 hours were included. All clinical mea-surements were done by one observer. The sensitivity, specificity and positive predictive value of the JTM were calculated.
Results: We found non-significant difference between the mean of the fetal weight (3295 g) calculated with the JTM and the mean of the newborn infants weight (3343 g) (p = NS). The standard deviation was 325 g and the standard error mean was ≥ 53 g or 16 g/kg (error = 1.6 %). In normal weight groups of neonates, the JTM had a sensitivity of 97 %, a specificity of 71 % and the positive predictive value was 98 %. We observed a higher sensitivity in the detection of macrosomy (80 %) than in low-weight newborns (33 %), but with an inverted specificity of 71.4 % vs. 99.2 %, respectively.
Conclusion: The JTM is a useful clinical technique to estimate fetal weight in the third trimester of gestation that may be applied when US is not available, being more sensitive to detect normal weight than macrosomy or low-weight newborns.

REFERENCES

1. 1. Valenzuela-Tinoco E, Puente-González H. Maldonado-Alvarado J. Predicción del peso fetal mediante la técnica de Johnson y Toshach. Ginecol Obstet Mex 1998;66:420-422.

2. 2. Sauceda-González L, Ramírez-Sordo J, Rivera-Flores S, Falcón-Martínez JC, Zarain-Llaguno F. Estudio multicéntrico de predicción clínica del peso fetal en embarazos de término. Ginecol Obstet Mex 2003;71:174-180.

3. 3. Poulos PP, Langstadt JR. The volume of the uterus during labor and its correlation with birth weight. Am J Obstet Gynecol 1953;65:233-244.

4. 4. Insler V, Bernstein D, Rikover M, Segal T. Esti-mation of fetal weight in utero by simple external palpation. Am J Obstet Gynecol 1967;98:292-293.

5. 5. Johnson R, Toshach C. Estimation of fetal weight using longitudinal mensuration. Am J Obstet Gynecol 1954;68:891-896.

6. 6. Hadlock FP, Harrist RB. Sharman RS, Deter RL, Park SK. Estimation of fetal weight with the use of head, body and femur measurements – a pros-pective study. Am J Obstet Gynecol 1985;151: 333-337.

7. 7. Gross T. Desnutrición y obesidad maternas; trata-miento de las complicaciones clínicas del embarazo. Buenos Aires, Argentina: Médica Panamericana; 2000. p. 391-408.

8. 8. Ott W, Doyle S. Normal ultrasonic fetal weight curve. Obstet Gynecol 1982;59:603-606.

9. 9. Warsof S, Wolf P, Coulehan J, Queenan J. Com-parison of fetal weight estimation formulas with and without head measurements. Obstet Gynecol 1986;67:569-573.

10. Watson W, Soisson A, Harlasi F. Estimated weight of the term fetus. Accuracy of ultrasound vs. clinical examination. J Reprod Med 1988;33:369-371.

11. Patterson R. Estimation of fetal weight during labor. Obstet Gynecol 1985;65:330-332.

12. Pommier M, Escobedo F, Lowenberg E. Estudio de la altura del fondo uterino para la detección del crecimiento intrauterino retardado. Ginecol Obstet Mex 1979;46:253-259.

13. Hernández-Moreno MJ, Vargas-García C, Vera-Gaspar D, Casanova-Álvarez N, Manzanilla-Sevilla R. Evaluación del método clínico de Johnson y Toshach para calcular peso fetal. Ginecol Obstet Mex 1985;53:63-67.