medigraphic.com
ISSN 1561-2945 (Print)

2018, Number 3

<< Back Next >>

Revista Cubana de Cirugía 2018; 57 (3)

Morbidity and conversion rate in laparoscopy approach in selected patients with adhesive intestinal obstruction

Orue-Echebarria MI, Lozano P, Ciriano HP, Sanz, M, Pérez DMD

Language: Spanish
References: 16
Page: 1-10
PDF size: 163.82 Kb.


ABSTRACT

Introduction: Adherence syndrome is the most frequent cause of small bowel obstruction. Laparotomy is the standard approach. The progress of minimally invasive surgery makes it possible to resolve obstructive frames by laparoscopy.
Objective: To analyze the laparoscopic approach for intestinal obstruction and compare it with the open pathway.
Method: Retrospective analysis of patients treated for acute intestinal obstruction by laparoscopy in our hospital, from 2012 to 2016. A group of patients treated from 2002 to 2005 were used as reference, when only the open approach was used. We analyzed demographic data, surgical risk, comorbidities, diagnostic methods and complications (Clavien).
Results: Within the 134 patients operated for acute intestinal obstruction, a laparoscopic approach was started in 47 (35%). Only 32 patients (68%) were completed in this way. The conversion rate was 32%, these patients were eliminated from the study. In the reference group, 32 patients were randomly analyzed. Both groups are comparable. The group treated with laparoscopic approach had 9% complications and 3% reoperations, with a single unexpected lesion. The laparoscopic group had 12.5% of reintervention, all due to evisceration, but had a higher rate of intestinal resections. There was no hospital mortality.
Conclusion: In patients who have completed laparoscopic surgery, the results are compared favorably with those of the open approach in a homogeneous historical reference group, and without the added risk of evisceration.


REFERENCES

  1. Wu B, Gu C, Yan X, Yu H, You Z, Wang H, et al. Clinical Treatment and Analysis of Laparoscopic Enterolysis Surgery. Indian J Surg. 2015;77(2):698-702.

  2. Saklani A, Naguib N, Shah P, Mekhail P, Winstanley S, Masoud A. Adhesive intestinal obstruction in laparoscopic vs open colorectal resection. Colorectal Disease. 2012;15(1):80-4.

  3. Li M, Lian L, Xiao L, Wu W, He Y, Song X. Laparoscopic versus open adhesiolysis in patients with adhesive small bowel obstruction: a systematic review and metaanalysis. Am J Surg. 2012;204(5):779-86.

  4. Doyle DJ, Garmon EH. American Society of Anesthesiologists Classification (ASA Class). StatPearls Publishing; 2017.

  5. Dindo D, Demartines N, Clavien PA. Classification of Surgical Complications. Ann Surg. 2004;240(2):205-13.

  6. Ten Broek R, Issa Y, Van Santbrink E, Bouvy N, Kruitwagen R, Jeekel J, et al. Burden of adhesions in abdominal and pelvic surgery: systematic review and metanalysis. BMJ. 2013;347:f5588. Disponible en: https://doi.org/10.1136/bmj.f5588 (Published 03 October 2013).

  7. Parker MC, Ellis H, Moran BJ, Thompson J, Wilson M, Menzies D, et al. Postoperative adhesions: ten-year follow-up of 12,584 patients undergoing lower abdominal surgery. Dis Colon Rectum. 2001;44(6):822-9.

  8. Bastug DF, Trammell SW, Boland JP, Mantz EP, Tiley EH 3rd. Laparoscopic Adhesiolysis for Small Bowel Obstruction. Surg Laparosc Endosc. 1991;1(4):259-62.

  9. Kelly K, Iannuzzi J, Rickles A, Garimella V, Monson JR, Fleming FJ. Laparotomy for small-bowel obstruction: first choice or last resort for adhesiolysis? A laparoscopic approach for small-bowel obstruction reduces 30-day complications. Surg Endosc. 2013;28(1):65-73.

  10. Jafari MD, Jafari F, Foe-Paker JE, Phelan MJ, Carmichael JC, Pigazzi A, et al. Adhesive Small Bowel Obstruction in the United States: Has Laparoscopy Made an Impact? Ann Surg. 2015;81(10):1028-33.

  11. Byrne J, Saleh F, Ambrosini L, Quereshy F, Jackson TD, Okrainec A. Laparoscopic versus open surgical management of adhesive small bowel obstruction: a comparison of outcomes. Surg Endosc. 2014;29(9):2525-32.

  12. Mancini G, Petroski GF, Lin WC, Sporn E, Miedema BW, Thaler K. Nationwide Impact of Laparoscopic Lysis of Adhesions in the Management of Intestinal Obstruction in the US. J Am Coll Surg. 2008;207(4):520-26.

  13. Wullstein C, Gross E. Laparoscopic compared with conventional treatment of acute adhesive small bowel obstruction. Br J Surg. 2003;90(9):1147-51.

  14. Nordin A, Freedman J. Laparoscopic versus open surgical management of small bowel obstruction: an analysis of clinical outcomes. Surg Endosc. 2016;30(10):4454-63.

  15. Ghosheh B, Salameh JR. Laparoscopic approach to acute small bowel obstruction: review of 1061 cases. Surg Endosc. 2007;21(11):1945–49.

  16. O’Connor DB, Winter DC. The role of laparoscopy in the management of acute small-bowel obstruction: a review of over 2000 cases. Surg Endosc. 2012;26(1):12-7.




2020     |     www.medigraphic.com