Valdez-Santiago R, Rojas-Carmona A, Villanueva-Egan LA, Lomelin-Aragón P, Ortega AC, del Río ZA, Arenas-Monreal L

Language: Spanish
References: 21
Page: 190-197
PDF size: 810.23 Kb.

ABSTRACT

Objective: Describe the design and implementation of an intervention to confront the abuse of women during childbirth care in Mexico. Material and methods: Two methodological actions were made. The first consisted of a review of conventional literature and gray literature of Latin America and the Caribbean, this review aimed to identify previous experiences in design of interventions to address abuse against women during childbirth care. The search covered the period between January 1, 1990 to October 31, 2014. The second action consisted of the design and implementation of an intervention within health workers in several states of Mexico. Results: Literature review. Seven articles were identified in the category of interventions made in Latin America. The intervention’s design is a methodological theoretical supported in: a) gender perspective b) violence against women based in the ecological model, c) health promotion d) peace education and e) rapprochement counselling. Several health workers among 22 states of Mexico have been trained for this approach. Conclusions: The intervention designed and implemented in Mexico is relevant because it is the first effort of the Ministry of Health to address the abuse and disrespect in obstetric care among public health services. It is necessary to carry out an assessment to ascertain the scope and limitations as well as the next steps.

REFERENCES

1. Freedman LP, Ramsey K, Abuya T, Bellows B, Ndwiga CH, Warren CHE et al. Defining disrespect and abuse of women in childbirth: a research, policy and rights agenda. Bull World Health Organ. 2014; 92:915-917.

2. Bowser D, Hill K. Exploring evidence for disrespect and abuse in facility-based childbirth report of a landscape analysis. Cambridge: USAID-Traction. Project Harvard School of Public Health, University Research Co; 2010. p. 57.

3. Jewkes R, Penn-Kekana L. Mistreatment of women in childbirth: time for action on this important dimension of violence against women. PLoS Med. 2015; 12: e1001849. doi: 10.1371/journal.pmed.1001849).

4. Bohren MA, Vogel JP, Hunter EC, et al. The mistreatment of women during childbirth in health facilities globally: a mixed-methods systematic review. PLoS Med 2015; 12 (6): e1001847. doi:10.1371/ Journal. pmed.1001847.

5. Valdez-Santiago R, Hidalgo-Solórzano E, Mojarro-Iñiguez M et al. Nueva evidencia a un viejo problema: el abuso de las mujeres en las salas de parto. CONAMED. 2013; 8: 14-20.

6. Valdez-Santiago R, Martín Rodríguez J, Arenas-Monreal L et al. Adherencia terapéutica a programas de reeducación para mujeres y hombres en relaciones de pareja violentas. Sal Pub Méx. 2015; 57: 537-546.

7. Hijar-Medina M, Valdez-Santiago R. Programas de intervención con mujeres víctimas de violencia de pareja y con agresores. Experiencia Internacional y mexicana. Cuernavaca, México: Instituto Nacional de Salud Pública, 2008.

8. Valdez-Santiago R, Arenas-Monreal L, Lomelin P. Metodología de talleres de sensibilización para personal de salud adscrito a los servicios de obstetricia en hospitales de Morelos, México. Informe final. Cuernavaca: INSP, 2013.

9. Prongianti JM, Oliveira Mouta RJ. A enfermería obstétrica: agente estratégico na implantacao de práticas do modelo humanizado em maternidades. Rev. Enferm. 2009; 17: 165-169.

10. Instituto de Género, Derecho y Desarrollo. Con todo al aire 2. Reporte de derechos humanos sobre atención en salud reproductiva en hospitales públicos. Argentina: CLADEM/INSGENAR, 2008.

11. Valdez-Santiago R, Vargas-Urías Mauro A, González-Focke M. Bases conceptuales del Programa de Re-educación para agresores de violencia de pareja. En: Ramírez JC, Cervantes-Ríos JC, coord. Los hombres en México. Veredas recorridas y por andar. Guadalajara: Universidad de Guadalajara, CUCEA-AMEGH, 2013. p. 111-132.

12. Olivares Ferreto E, Incháustegui Romero T. Modelo Ecológico para una vida libre de violencia de género. Ciudad de México: Comisión Nacional para Prevenir y Erradicar la Violencia contra las Mujeres, 2011.

13. Sanz F. Psicoerotismo femenino y masculino. Para relaciones placenteras, autónomas y justas. 7ª edición. Barcelona: Editorial Kairós, 2008.

14. Davis-Floyd R. The technocratic, humanistic, and holistic paradigms of childbirth. Int J Gynecol Obstet. 2001; 75: S5-S23.

15. Davis-Floyd R. From technobirth to cyborg babies: Reflections on the emergent discourse of a holistic anthropologist. In: Davis-Floyd R, Dumit J (eds.). Cyborg babies: From techno-sex to techno-tots. New York: Routledge; 1998. p. 255-283.

16. Valdez-Santiago R, Arenas-Monreal LM, Hidalgo-Solórzano E y cols. El abuso de las mujeres en las Salas de Maternidad: nueva evidencia sobre un viejo problema. Resumen ejecutivo. Cuernavaca: Instituto Nacional de Salud Pública, 2013.

17. Cámara de Diputados. Ley General de Acceso de las Mujeres a una Vida Libre de Violencia. México. Diario Oficial de la Federación, 2013.

18. Sodré TM, Merighi MPB, Bonadio IC. Escolha informada no parto: um pensar para o cuidado centrado nas necesidades da mulher. Cienc Cuid Saude. 2012; 11 (Suplem): 115-120.

19. Rodrigues BM, Madeira LM, Gonçalves de Oliveira VM. As práticas integrativas e complementares na atenção à saúde da mulher: uma estratégia de humanização da assistência no hospital Sofia Feldman. Rev Min Enferm. 2011; 15: 105-113.

20. Melo KL, Vieira BDG, Alves VH et al. O comportamento expresso pela parturiente durante o trabalho de parto: reflexos da assistência do pré-natal. J Res Fundam Care. 2014; 6: 1007-1020.

21. De Carvalho ML. Participação dos país no nascimento em maternidade pública: dificuldades institucionais e motivações dos casais. Cad Saúde Pública. 2003; 19 (Sup 2): S389-S398.