medigraphic.com
Organo Oficial de la Sociedad Mexicana de Urología

2017, Number 4

<< Back Next >>

Rev Mex Urol 2017; 77 (4)

Percutaneous nephrolithotomy complications according to the modified Clavien-Dindo classification: An institutional experience

López-Maguey R, Gómez-Sánchez J, Martínez-Arroyo C, Herrara-Muñoz J, Sánchez-Aquino UC, Viana-Álvarez G

Language: Spanish
References: 10
Page: 272-278
PDF size: 279.06 Kb.


ABSTRACT

Background: The incidence and prevalence of urinary lithiasis has increased worldwide. Some studies report a prevalence of 13% of all hospitalizations for kidney disease. Percutaneous nephrolithotomy is a standard procedure for the extraction of kidney stones larger than 2 cm. The Clavien-Dindo classification ranks the complications arising from that procedure.
Objetive: To determine the prevalence of and risk factors for complications in percutaneous nephrolithotomy.
Materials and Methods: Retrospective and descriptive study carried out by the medical records of patients that underwent percutaneous nephrolithotomy within the time frame of 2013 to 2016 were reviewed. Comorbidities, body mass index, stone volume, and perioperative complications were evaluated and the SPSS®program was used for the statistical analysis.
Results: Forty-seven percutaneous nephrolithotomies were performed during the study period. The comorbidities identified were high blood pressure in 12 (25%) patients and diabetes in 16 (34%). The mean body mass index was 28.7 kg/m2 and the mean stone volume was 446 mm3. The most frequent complications (7 [14%]), according to the Clavien-Dindo classification, were grade II (71%) and grade IIIa (28%). Comorbidities, body mass index, and stone volume were not statistically significant for the development of complications (p = 0.197, p = 0.551, p = 0.185, respectively).
Conclusions: Comorbidities, such as obesity, have been shown in the international medical literature to be risk factors for the development of major complications in percutaneous nephrolithotomy. However, in our population, comorbidities, body mass index, and stone volume were not related to the development of complications.


REFERENCES

  1. Otero F, Lugo A, Durán A. Las enfermedades renales en el Instituto Mexicano del Seguro Social (1982-1989). Rev Asoc Med Int Mex. 1995;11:21-29.

  2. Khurshi R, Sero A. Et al. Percutaneous nephrolithotomy: update trends and future directions. Eur Urol, 2016;6647:1-15.

  3. Türk C, Knoll T, Petrik A, et al. Guidelines on urolithiasis. European Association of Urology Web site.http://uroweb.org/ wp-content/uploads/22-Urolithiasis_LR.pdf. Updated 2014.

  4. Preminger GM, Assimos DG, Lingeman JE, Nakada SY, Pearle MS, Wolf JS. Chapter 1: AUA guideline on management of staghorn calculi: diagnosis and treatment recommendations. J Urol, 2005;173:1991-2000.

  5. Fernström I, Johansson B. Percutaneous pyelolithotomy. A new extraction technique. Scand J Urol Nephrol 1976;10:257-9.

  6. De la Rossette JJ, Opondo D, Daels FP, Giusti G, et al. Categorisation of complications and validation of the Clavien score for percutaneous nephrolithotomy. Eur Urol. 62 (2012); 246-255

  7. Myatt A, Palit V, et al, The Uro-Clavien-Dindo system - will the limitations of the Clavien-Dindo System for grading complications of urological surgery allow modification of the classification to encourage national adoption within the UK? Br J Med Surg Urol. 2012;5:54-60.

  8. Labate G, Modi P, et al, The Percutaneous Nephrolithotomy Global Study: Classification of complications. J Endorol 2011;8:1275-1280.

  9. Fuller A, Razvi H, et a.; The CROES Percutaneous Nephrolithotomy Global Study: The influence of body mass index on outcome; J Urol, 2012; Vol 198,138-144

  10. Ceballos-López JE, Carvaja GR, et al. Factores asociados a complicaciones en pacientes sometidos a nefrolitotomía percutánea. Rev Mex Urol 2016;76(3);148-152.




2020     |     www.medigraphic.com