medigraphic.com
ISSN 2992-8036 (Electronic)
ISSN 2306-4102 (Print)
Órgano Oficial del Colegio Mexicano de Ortopedia y Traumatología

2017, Number 4

<< Back Next >>

Acta Ortop Mex 2017; 31 (4)

Clinical and radiographic evaluation of a new percutaneous technique for moderate to severe hallux valgus deformity

Vélez-de Lachica JC, Valdez-Jiménez LA, Inzunza-Sánchez JM

Language: Spanish
References: 21
Page: 171-176
PDF size: 167.43 Kb.


ABSTRACT

Hallux valgus is considered the most common musculoskeletal deformity, with a prevalence of 88%. There are more than 130 surgical techniques for its treatment; currently, percutaneous ones are popular; however, they do not take into account the metatarsal-phalangeal correction angle. The aim of this study is to propose a modified technique for the correction of the percutaneous metatarsal-phalangeal and inter-metatarsal angles and to evaluate its clinical and radiological results. Material and methods: An experimental, prospective and longitudinal study in 10 patients with moderate to severe hallux valgus according to the classification of Coughlin and Mann were collected; the results were evaluated with the AOFAS scale at 15, 30, 60 and 90 days. The McBride technique and the technique of percutaneous anchor with the proposed amendment were performed. Results: The AOFAS scale was applied as described, finding a progressive increase of the rating; the average correction of the inter-metatarsal angle was 8.8 degrees and of the metatarsal-phalangeal, 9.12. Discussion: The modified technique of percutaneous anchor showed clear clinical and radiographic improvements in the short term. Our modified technique is proposed for future projects, including a large sample with long-term follow-up.


REFERENCES

  1. 1.er Congreso Internacional; 10 Curso Taller de Patología Quirúrgica del Pie. Sociedad Mexicana de Medicina y Cirugía de Pie, AC; 2012.

  2. Johnson K: Pie y tobillo. Scotsdale, Arizona: Marbán; 1998: 308.

  3. Coughlin MJ, Saltzman CL, Anderson RB: Surgery of the foot and ankle. 9.a ed. Philadelphia: Elsevier Inc; 2009.

  4. Perera AM, Mason L, Stephens MM: The pathogenesis of hallux valgus. J Bone Joint Surg Am. 2011; 93(17): 1650-61.

  5. Srivastava S, Chockalingam N, El Fakhri T: Radiographic measurements of hallux angles: a review of current techniques. Foot (Edinb). 2010; 20(1): 27-31.

  6. Wülker N, Mittag F: The treatment of hallux valgus. Dtsch Arztebl Int. 2012; 109(49): 857-67; quiz 868.

  7. Wagner E, Ortiz C: Osteotomy considerations in hallux valgus treatment: improving the correction power. Foot Ankle Clin. 2012; 17(3): 481-98.

  8. Baščarević ZL, Vukašinović ZS, Baščarević VD, Stevanović VB, Spasovski DV, Janičić RR: Hallux valgus. Acta Chir lugoslavica. 2011; 58(3): 107-11.

  9. Steven H, Stern M: Key techniques in orthopaedic surgery. New York: Thieme Medical Publishers; 2001: 248-52.

  10. Maffulli N, Easley M: Minimally invasive forefoot surgery in clinical practice. Springer; 2013: 237.

  11. Toolan BC, Wright-Quinones VJ, Cunningham BJ, Brage ME: An evaluation of the use of retrospectively acquired preoperative AOFAS clinical rating scores to assess surgical outcome after elective foot and ankle surgery. Foot Ankle. 2001; 22(10): 775-7.

  12. Barragán-Hervella RG, Morales-Flores F, Arratia-Ríos M, Buzo-Garcidueñas AY, Nesme-Ávila W, García-Villaseñor A: Resultados clínicos de la cirugía de mínima invasión de hallux valgus. Acta Ortop Mex. 2008; 22(3): 150-6.

  13. Angthong C, Kanitnate S, Angthong W: Hallux valgus correction using a Mini TightRope device: a report of the short-term outcomes in 3 feet. J Med Assoc Thai. 2011; 94 Suppl 7: S66-72.

  14. Almalki TH, Alrabai HM, Algarni AD, Al-Ahaideb A: Radiological evaluation of hallux valgus after application of Mini TightRope: short-term results. J Taibah Univ Med Sci. 2014; 9(1): 41-4.

  15. Cano-Martínez JA, Picazo-Marín F, Bento-Gerard J, Nicolás-Serrano G: Treatment of moderate hallux valgus with a Mini TightRope® system: a modified technique. Rev Esp Cir Ortop Traumatol. 2011; 55(5): 358-68.

  16. Mader DW, Han NM: Bilateral second metatarsal stress fractures after hallux valgus correction with the use of a tension wire and button fixation system. J Foot Ankle Surg. 2010; 49(5): 488.e15-9.

  17. Weatherall JM, Chapman CB, Shapiro SL: Postoperative second metatarsal fractures associated with suture-button implant in hallux valgus surgery. Foot Ankle Int. 2013; 34(1): 104-10.

  18. Kayiaros S, Blankenhorn BD, Dehaven J, Van Lancker H, Sardella P, Pascalides JT, et al: Correction of metatarsus primus varus associated with hallux valgus deformity using the arthrex mini tightrope: a report of 44 cases. Foot Ankle Spec. 2011; 4(4): 212-7.

  19. Holmes GB: Correction of hallux valgus deformity using the Mini TightRope device. Tech Foot Ankle Surg. 2008; 7(1): 9-16.

  20. Holmes GB: Correction of the intermetatarsal angle component of hallux valgus using fiberwire-attached endo-buttons. Revista Internacional de Ciencias Podológicas. 2012; 6(2): 73-9.

  21. Holmes GB Jr, Hsu AR: Correction of intermetatarsal angle in hallux valgus using small suture button device. Foot Ankle Int. 2013; 34(4): 543-9.




2020     |     www.medigraphic.com