medigraphic.com
ISSN 2395-9215 (Print)
Órgano Oficial de Difusión de la Facultad de Odontología de la UNAM

2016, Number 3

<< Back Next >>

Rev Mex Ortodon 2016; 4 (3)

Crowding severity associated with dental mass

Santiesteban-Ponciano FA, Gutiérrez-Rojo MF, Gutiérrez-Rojo JF

Language: Spanish
References: 17
Page: 165-168
PDF size: 166.78 Kb.


ABSTRACT

Crowding has been classified as one of various types of malocclusions, which are identified as the third most prevalent oral disease. It is of great importance in orthodontics to know the mesiodistal length of teeth because it is an determining factor in the diagnosis of space discrepancies of the jaws. Objective: To determine if there is more dental mass associated with an increase in the severity of crowding. Material and methods: A sample of 120 study models with no previous orthodontic treatment was formed. It was divided into 3 groups: 40 with mild crowding, 40 with moderate crowding and 40 with severe crowding. Mesiodistal dental widths were measured in both arches from the right first molar to the left first molar. The information was tabulated in a Microsoft Excel sheet and statistics were performed in StatCalc version 8.1.3 program. Descriptive statistics were calculated and ANOVA tests were performed. Results: The average age was 16 years. In the maxilla, in the severe crowding cases, average tooth mass was 101.34 mm and in the mandible, 93.50 mm. In moderate crowding cases, in the upper dental arch, the average tooth mass was 98.30 mm and in the lower arch, 90.15 mm. In arches with mild crowding an average tooth mass of 95.06 mm was found in the maxilla and of 87.10 mm in the mandbile. When comparing the groups with severe crowding, statistically significant differences in the maxilla and mandible were found. Conclusions: As the crowding severity increases, there is more tooth mass in patients.


REFERENCES

  1. Lazo Y, Peñalver S, Casamayor Z. Necesidad de tratamiento ortodóncico en estudiantes de preuniversitario. Rev Cub Med Mil. 2014; 43 (1): 3-10.

  2. Aliaga-Del Castillo A, Mattos-Vela M, Aliaga-Del Castillo R, Del Castillo-Mendoza C. Maloclusiones en niños y adolescentes de caseríos y comunidades nativas de la Amazonía de Ucayali, Perú. Rev Perú Med Exp Salud Pública. 2011; 28 (1): 87-91.

  3. Montiel M. Frecuencia de maloclusiones y su asociación con hábitos perniciosos en una población de niños mexicanos de 6 a 12 años de edad. Rev ADM. 2004; 61 (6): 209-214.

  4. Di Santi J, Vázquez V. Maloclusión de clase I: definición, clasificación, características clínicas y tratamiento. Revista Latinoamericana de Ortodoncia y Odontopediatría [Internet]. 2003 [Citado 2015 noviembre 30]. Disponible en: http://www.ortodoncia.ws/publicaciones/2003/art8.asp

  5. Moyers R. Manual de ortodoncia. 4ta edición. Buenos Aires: Panamericana; 1998: p. 442.

  6. Minhas A, Mahmood A, Hussaint A, Rafi S, Ullah N. The correlation between lower incisor crowding and arch length discrepancy (ALD). POJ. 2012; 4 (2): 56-62.

  7. Janson G, Goizueta OE, Garib DG, Janson M. Relationship between maxillary and mandibular base lengths and dental crowding in patients with complete class II malocclusions. Angle Orthod. 2011; 81 (2): 217-221.

  8. Gianelly A. Crowding: timing of treatment. Angle Orthod. 1994; 64 (6): 415-418.

  9. Di Santi J. Fuerzas producidas por el LipBumper [Internet]. Acta Odontol Venez. 2005; 43 (1): 61-68. Disponible en: http://www.actaodontologica.com/ediciones/2005/1/fuerzas_por_lip_bumper.asp

  10. Gutiérrez-Rojo J, Ceseña-Noriega R, Mendoza-Sandoval P. Efectividad de la ecuación de Tonn para predecir el tamaño mesiodistal de los incisivos maxilares permanentes en Tepic, Nayarit. Revista Latinoamericana de Ortodoncia y Odontopediatría [Internet]. 2013 [Citado 2015 noviembre 30]. Disponible en: http://www.ortodoncia.ws/publicaciones/2013/art28.asp

  11. Bernabé E, Flores-Mir C. Dental morphology and crowding: a multivariate approach. Angle Orthod. 2006; 76 (1): 20-25.

  12. Bernabé E, Villanueva KM, Flores-Mir C. Tooth width ratios in crowded and noncrowded dentitions. Angle Orthod. 2004; 74 (6): 765-768.

  13. Austro M, Ostos M, García C, Pérez L. Análisis de la simetría del tamaño dentario mesiodistal de la misma muestra en dentición mixta y permanente. Estudio longitudinal. Av Odontoestomatol. 2014; 20 (6): 305-312.

  14. Bansal V, Bansal P, Aggarwal S, Batra M, Gupta M. Tooth size in crowded and spaced dentition among Western Uttar Pradesh population: a biometric study. International Journal of Scientific Study. 2013; 01 (03): 81-88.

  15. Puri N, Lata K, Chandna A, Sehgal V, Gupta R. Biometric study of tooth size in normal, crowded, and spaced permanent dentitions. Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop. 2007; 132 (3): 279e7-279e14.

  16. Waheed-Ul-Hamid M, Rahbar M. Dental crowding and its relationship to tooth size and arch dimensions. Pakistan Oral & Dent. 2005; 25 (1): 47-52.

  17. Ruíz I. Análisis de ancho mesio distal coronario y discrepancias dento-dentarias en pacientes ortodóncicos de la ciudad de Talca. Memoria para optar al título de Cirujano Dentista. Universidad de Talca; 2004: p. 29.




2020     |     www.medigraphic.com