Pérez VJ

Idioma: Español
Referencias bibliográficas: 19
Paginas: 169-173
Archivo PDF: 277.39 Kb.

RESUMEN

La cefalometría es un método universal estandarizado que permite el diagnóstico, la predicción y la planeación del tratamiento de diversas deformidades dentofaciales. El objetivo del presente artículo es proponer un estudio cefalométrico bidimensional simplificado.

REFERENCIAS (EN ESTE ARTÍCULO)

1. Ryan FS, Barnard M, Cunningham SJ. What are orthognathic patients’ expectations of treatment outcome-a qualitative study. J Oral Maxillofac Surg. 2012; 70 (11): 2648-2655.

2. Chen B, Zhang ZK, Wang X. Factors influencing postoperative satisfaction of orthognathic surgery patients. Int J Adult Orthodon Orthognath Surg. 2002; 17 (3): 217-222.

3. Reineke P. Essentials of orthognathic surgery. Quintessence Publishing; 2003: pp. 15-65, 69-75.

4. Sinclair PM, Kilpelainen P, Phillips C, White RP Jr, Rogers L, Sarver DM. The accuracy of video imaging in orthognathic surgery. Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop. 1995; 107 (2): 177-185.

5. Cousley RR, Grant E. The accuracy of preoperative orthognathic predictions. Br J Oral Maxillofac Surg. 2004; 42: 96-104.

6. McNeil RW, Proffit WR, White RP. Cephalometric prediction for orthodontic surgery. Angle Orthod. 1972; 42: 154-164.

7. Jones RM, Khambay BS, McHugh S, Ayoub AF. The validity of a computer-assisted simulation system for orthognathic surgery (CASSOS) for planning the surgical correction of class III skeletal deformities: single-jaw versus bimaxillary surgery. Int J Oral Maxillofac Surg. 2007; 36 (10): 900-908.

8. Abe N, Kuroda S, Furutani M, Tanaka E. Data-based prediction of soft tissue changes after orthognathic surgery: clinical assessment of new simulation software. Int J Oral Maxillofac Surg. 2015; 44 (1): 90-96.

9. Xia J, Samman N, Yeung RW, Shen SG, Wang D, Ip HH et al. Three-dimensional virtual reality surgical planning and simulation workbench for orthognathic surgery. Int J Adult Orthodon Orthognath Surg. 2000; 15 (4): 265-282.

10. Farrel B, Franco B, Tucker R. Virtual surgical planning in orthognathic surgery. Oral Maxillofac Surg Clin North Am. 2014; 26: 459-473.

11. Betts NJ, Dowd KF. Soft tissue changes associated with orthognathic surgery. Atlas Oral Maxillofac Surg Clin North Am. 2000; 8: 13-38.

12. Barbenel J, Paul E, Khambay B, Walker S, Moos F, Ayoub F. Errors in orthognathic surgery planning: the effect of inaccurate study model orientation. Int J Oral Maxillofac Surg. 2010; 39: 1103-1108.

13. Marchetti C, Bianchi A, Muyldermans L, Di Martino M, Lancellotti L, Sarti A. Validation of new soft tissue software in orthognathic surgery planning. Int J Oral Maxillofac Surg. 2011; 40: 26-32.

14. Nadjmi N, Mollemans W, Daelemans A, Van Hemelen G, Schutyser F, Bergé S. Virtual occlusion in planning orthognathic surgical procedures. Int J Oral Maxillofac Surg. 2010; 39 (5): 457-462.

15. Kwon J, Choi W, Kyung M, Park H. Accuracy of maxillary repositioning in two-jaw surgery with conventional articulator model surgery versus virtual model surgery. Int J Oral Maxillofac Surg. 2014; 43: 732-738.

16. Khambay B, Ullah R. Current methods of assessing the accuracy of three-dimensional soft tissue facial predictions: technical and clinical considerations. Int J Oral Maxillofac Surg. 2015; 44: 132-138.

17. McCormick U, Drew J. Virtual model surgery for efficient planning and surgical performance. J Oral Maxillofac Surg. 2011; 69: 638-644.

18. Gossett C, Preston C, Dunford R, Lam-passo J. Prediction accuracy of computer- assisted surgical visual treatment objectives as compared with conventional visual treatment objectives. J Oral Maxillofac Surg. 2005; 63: 609-617.

19. Pospisil OA. Reliability and feasibility of prediction tracing in orthognathic surgery. J Craniomaxillofac Surg. 1987; 15 (2): 79-83.