2005, Number 2
<< Back Next >>
salud publica mex 2005; 47 (2)
Gender based violence: Knowledge and attitudes of health care providers in Nicaragua
Rodríguez-Bolaños RA, Márquez-Serrano M, Kageyama-Escobar ML
Language: Spanish
References: 34
Page: 134-144
PDF size: 116.52 Kb.
ABSTRACT
Objective. To assess the knowledge and attitudes of health care personnel towards the identification and referral of gender-based violence victims (GBV). Also, to identify barriers to identification and referral of GBV, and to assess the levels of knowledge about Norms and Procedures for Intra-Family Violence Care by the health care personnel of the Nicaraguan’s Minister of Health (MINSA, for its initials in Spanish).
Material and Methods. A cross-sectional study was conducted among healthcare professionals, including physicians, nurses and nursing technical aides (n=213), in 5 of the 17 Local Systems of Integral Attention (SILAIS) from the Integral Program of Attention for Women, Children and Adolescence (AIMNA) in the primary level of attention in MINSA, from April to June 2003. Attitude was measured with a Likert scale and an awareness index was created for intra-family violence care guidelines. The information was obtained using a self-administered instrument, based on the questionnaire of the study made among the personnel of the Mexican Institute for Social Security (IMSS, for its initials in Spanish), Morelos, Mexico. A logistic regression model was used to evaluate the association between attitude and several factors, as well as with the knowledge of care guidelines.
Results. In our population, 76.06% showed an attitude opposing GBV. In the multivariate analysis, the factors associated with opposition to GBV were: medical profession (OR 6.5, 95%CI 2.70-15.82), having a middle (OR 4.3, 95%CI 1.87-10.26) or high level (OR 3.3, 95%CI 1.03-10.75) of knowledge about intra-family violence guidelines and the closeness to relatives or friends who were victims of gender violence (OR 3.2, 95%CI 1.56-6.80). The lack of training on the subject (59.9%), fear of getting involved in legal issues (52.6%), and the concept that violence is a private affair and not a social one (50.7%), constituted the most important barriers to providing medical care.
Conclusions. The health care personnel generally were observed to have high values in regard to an attitude of rejection towards GBV. However, we found barriers that show persisting traditional beliefs, such as considering violence to be a personal issue. Therefore, in order, to ensure a substantial improvement, better training about this subject is needed in medical school curricula with an emphasis on the gender perspective. The finding of the present study will allow improvements in health care reforms at the first level of care in the health sector in Nicaragua.
REFERENCES
Híjar-Medina M, López-López MV, Blanco-Muñoz J. La violencia y sus repercusiones en la salud; reflexiones teóricas y magnitud del problema en México. Salud Publica Mex 1997;39:565-572.
García-Moreno C. Violencia contra la mujer: género y equidad en salud. Washington, DC: Organización Panamericana de la Salud / Harvard Center for Population and Development Studies; 1999. Serie Género y Equidad en la Salud, Publicación Ocasional N°6.
Fawcett G, Venguer T, Vernon R, Pick S. Detección y manejo de mujeres víctimas de violencia doméstica: desarrollo y evaluación de un programa dirigido al personal de salud. México, D.F: Population Council INOPAL III; 1998; 26:7-30.
Valdez-Santiago R, Sanín-Aguirre LH. La violencia doméstica durante el embarazo y su relación con el bajo peso al nacer. Salud Publica Mex 1996;38:352-362.
Valladares E, Ellsberg M, Peña R, Högberg U, Persson LA. Physical partner abuse during pregnancy: A risk factor for low birth weight in Nicaragua. Obstet Gynecol 2002; 100: 700-705.
Monemi KA, Peña, R, Ellsberg M, Persson LA. Violence against women increases the risk of infant and child mortality: A case-referent study in Nicaragua. Bull World Health Organ 2003;81(1):10-16.
De la Fuente R, Medina-Mora ME, Caraveo J. Violencia y salud mental: salud mental en México. México, DF: Instituto Mexicano de Psiquiatría /Fondo de Cultura Económica; 1997:232-253.
Ellsberg M, Peña R, Herrera A, Lijestrand J, Winkvist A. Confites en el infierno: prevalencia y características de la violencia conyugal hacia las mujeres de Nicaragua. Managua: Asociación de Mujeres Profesionales por la Democracia en el Desarrollo; 1996.
Ministerio de Salud. Normas y Procedimientos para la Atención de la Violencia Intrafamiliar. Managua: Dirección de Atención Integral a la Mujer, Niñez y Adolescencia, MINSA; 2001.
Heise L, Pitanguy J, Germain A. Violencia contra la mujer: la carga oculta sobre la salud. Washington, DC: Organización Panamericana de la Salud; 1994.
Organización Panamericana de la Salud. Informe mundial de violencia y salud: resumen. Washington, DC; 2002.
Morrison AR, Orlando MB. El impacto socioeconómico de la violencia doméstica: Chile y Nicaragua. En: Morrison AR, Loreto M, ed. El costo del silencio: violencia doméstica en las Américas. Washington, DC: Banco Interamericano de Desarrollo; 1999:49-99.
Ministerio de Salud. Análisis de la situación de salud 1992-1998. Managua: MINSA/OPS/OMS; 2000.
Sugg NK, Thompson RS, Thompson DC, Maiuro R, Rivara FP. Domestic violence and primary care: Attitudes, practices, and beliefs. Arch Fam Med 1999; 8:301-306.
Méndez-Hernández P, Valdez-Santiago R, Viniegra-Velázquez L, Rivera-Rivera L, Salmerón-Castro J. Violencia contra la mujer: conocimiento y actitud del personal médico del Instituto Mexicano del Seguro Social, Morelos, México. Salud Publica Mex 2003:45(6):472-482.
Waalen J, Goodwin MM, Spitz AM, Petersen R, Saltzman LE. Screening for intimate partner violence by health care providers: Barriers and interventions. Am J Prev Med 2000;19(4):230-237.
Gerbert B, Caspers N, Bronstone A, Moe J, Abercrombie P. A qualitative analysis of how physicians with expertise in domestic violence approach the identification of victims. Ann Intern Med 1999;131:578-584.
Hathaway JE, Willis G, Zimmer B. Listening to survivors´ voices. Violence Against Women 2002;8(6):687-719.
Riquer-Fernández F. Salud y violencia de género: el relato de un intento de acercamiento. En: Gogna M, Ramón S, comp. Experiencias innovadoras en salud reproductiva. La complementación de las ciencias médicas y sociales. Buenos Aires: Centro de Estudios de la Sociedad; 2002:83-103.
Novack DH, Suchman AL, Clark W, Epstein RM, Najberg E, Kaplan C. Calibrating the physician: Personal awareness and effective patient care. JAMA 1997;278:502-509.
Díaz-Olavarrieta C, Paz F, García de la Cadena C, Campbell J. Prevalence of intimate partner abuse among nurses and nurses´aides in Mexico. Arch Med Res 2001;32:79-89.
Ministerio de Salud. Abordaje Integral de la violencia doméstica desde los Servicios de Salud. Managua: MINSA; 2002.
Ministerio de Salud. Encuesta de Establecimientos de Salud en Nicaragua 2000. Managua: MINSA; 2000.
Casales JC.Algunos aspectos generales de la teoría de las actitudes. En: Casales JC. Psicología Social. Contribución a su estudio. La Habana, Cuba: Editorial de Ciencias Sociales; 1989:158-209.
Sugg NK, Inui T. Primary care physicians´ response to domestic violence. Opening Pandora´s Box. JAMA 1992;233(23):3157-3160.
Rodríguez MA, Bauer HA, McLoughlin E, Grumbach K. Screening and intervention for intimate partner abuse. Practices and attitudes of primary care physicians. JAMA 1999;282(5):468-474.
Parsons LH, Zaccaro D, Wells B, Stovall TG. Methods of and attitudes toward screening obstetrics and gynecology patients for domestic violence. Am J Obstet Gynecol 1995;173:381-387.
Cann K, Withnell S, Shakespeare J, Doll H, Thomas J. Domestic violence: A comparative survey of level of detection, knowledge, and attitudes in healthcare workers. Public Health 2001;115:89-95.
Organización Panamericana de la Salud / Organización Mundial de la Salud. Hacia un modelo integral de prevención y atención de la violencia intrafamiliar: ampliación y consolidación de las intervenciones coordinadas por el Estado y la sociedad civil. Programa Mujer, Salud y Desarrollo. Washington, DC: OPS/OMS; 2001. 16 p.
Alpert EJ, Tonkin AE, Seeherman AM, Holtz HA. Family violence curricula in U.S. medical schools. Am J Prev Med 1998;14:273-282.
Alpert EJ, Shannon D, Velonis A, Georges M, Rich RA. Family violence and public health education. Violence Against Women 2002;8(6):746-778.
Reid SA, Glasser M. Primary care physicians´ recognition of attitudes toward domestic violence. Acad Med 1997;(1):51-53.
Ferris LE. Canadian family physicians´ and general practitioners´ perceptions of their effectiveness in identifying and treating wife abuse. Med Care 1994; 32(12):1163-1172.
Groth B, Chelmowski MK, Batson TP. Domestic violence: Level of training, knowledge base and practice among Milwaukee physicians. WMJ 2001;100(1):24-28.