Ocampo MJ

Language: Spanish
References: 20
Page: 253-259
PDF size: 200.09 Kb.

ABSTRACT

Bioethics is an ethical thought over the multiple moral problems inherent in a contemporaneous plural society; among which are the ones involved in the practice of health care such as clinical psychology which shares with them the moral dimension of the relationship with healthy or sick people who require their service. It is important to highlight the need to address the bioethical thought of the clinical psychology expert before the ethical dilemma arisen by his doing; from the secular principialistic point of view, rather than from a normative character due to the inherited bias, this means, from a secular principialism: autonomy, beneficence and non-maleficence, justice, allowance, tolerance, caution, among others, as well as from the human rights speech, taking under consideration the patient’s rights in their state of particularly vulnerable subjects. The permanent ethical thought and analysis over the moral dimension of the psychologist-patient relationship must be such that, assuming the moral diversity, leads to the establishment of action and commitment limits between moral unequals as an essential part of the role that in that dimension carry out those who as clinical psychologists make an effort to achieve the physical and psychosocial welfare of human beings.

REFERENCES

1. Potter VR. Bioethics: Bridge to the future. New Jersey: Englewwod Cliffs Prentice Hall; 1971: 8-24.

2. Engelhardt TH. The foundations of bioethics. New York: Oxford University Press Inc.; 2004: 53-65.

3. Ocampo MJ. Bioética y ética médica: Un análisis indispensable. Rev Fac Med (Mex). 2007; 50 (1): 70-74.

4. Dibarbora E. Fundamentación de la bioética: bioética y psicología. BIOETICA-DEBAT. ORG [Fecha de acceso: 25 de mayo de 2013]. Disponible en: http://www.bioetica-debat.org/modules/news/article.php?storyid=148

5. Villamil H. Bioética, psicología y hermenéutica [Fecha de acceso: 25 de mayo de2013]. Disponible en: http://redalyc.uaemex.mx/src/inicio/ArtPdfRed.jsp?iCve=127012545011

6. Aristóteles. Acerca del alma. Madrid: Editorial Gredos; 1994: 12-256.

7. Parain B et al. La filosofía griega. México: Siglo XXI; 2007: 184-242.

8. Álvarez G. Historia de la psicología. [Fecha de acceso: 20 de mayo de 2013]. Disponible en: http://www.psicol.unam.mx/pdf1/Historia%20de%20la%20Psicologia%20Alvarez%20Diaz

9. Concepto e historia de la psicología. [Fecha de acceso: 20 de mayo de 2013] Disponible en: http://www.slideshare.net/catalan21/concepto-e-historia-de-la-psicologia

10. Principios éticos de los psicólogos y código de conducta de los psicólogos de la American Psychological Association (APA). Enmiendas 2010 [Fecha de acceso: 16 de Mayo de 2013]. Disponible en: http://www.proyectoetica.org/descargas/normativas_deontologicas/APA%202010.pdf

11. Thomas L. Living morally: A psycology of moral character. Philadelphia: Temple University Press; 1989: 215-317.

12. Beauchamp TL, Childress JF. The principles of biomedical ethics. 6a ed. New York: Oxford University Press Inc.; 2008: 20-490.

13. Baumrid D. Some thoughts on ethics of research: After Milgram’s behavioral study of obedience. Amer Psych. 1964; 19: 421-423.

14. Milgram S. Obedience to authority. New York: Harper and Row; 1974: 18-178.

15. Aristóteles. Obras filosóficas. México: Cumbre; 2005: 290.

16. Pence GE. Ethical options in medicine. New jersey: Medical Economics; 1989: 72-87.

17. Annas GJ, Grodin MA. The Nazi doctors and the Nuremberg code. New York: Oxford University Press; 1992: 11-103.

18. World Medical Association Inc. WMA Policy. Declaration of Helsinki 2008 [Acceso: 10 febrero de 2013]. Disponible en: http://www.wma.net/e/policy/17-c_e.html

19. Veatch RM. The patient-physician relation. The patient as partner. Part 2. Indianapolis: Indiana University Press; 1991: 140.

20. Ribes IE. Reflexiones sobre la eficacia profesional del psicólogo. Rev Mex Psic. 2005; 22 (1): 5-14.