Ariza OC

Language: Spanish
References: 19
Page: 18-24
PDF size: 140.62 Kb.

ABSTRACT

Given the importance of the contribution to the discipline of nursing, it is necessary to start from a formal revision of the epistemological development that Nursing has had as a discipline, a science and a profession. For this, the dimension of a conscious formation of a philosophy in nurses is analyzed, and so their relationship with the development of science and its linking to such a discipline by bearing in mind that it is precisely philosophy, an essential element in the integral training of a nurse, as demanded by the current society.
Each day, the need to start interpreting and searching for unifying senses to the nurse practice is more evident. In order to acting in good sense and a professional judgment, a strong conceptual reasoning, working upon the nursing epistemological object and deepen into the identities of being, knowing, and doing of this professional discipline are required.

REFERENCES

1. Ariza C. La Enfermería como Ciencia. Desarrollo Teórico Conceptual. Disertación. Programa de Doctorado en Enfermería. Facultad de enfermería. Universidad Nacional de Colombia. 2004.

2. Meleis A. Theoretical Nursing. Development and progress. St. Louis, JB. Lippincott. Co.1997.

3. Ariza C. Enfermería como ciencia. Actualizaciones de Enfermería. 2007; 10(1):22-6.

4. Monti E, Tingen M. Paradigmas múltiples de la ciencia de Enfermería. Advances in Nursing Science. 1999; 21 (4): 64-80.

5. Benner P, Wrubel J. The Primacy of Caring. Stress and Coping in Health and Illness. Menlo Park, CA; Addison-Wesley Publishing Co. 1989.

6. Moreno ME. Importancia de los Modelos Conceptuales y Teorías de Enfermería. Revista Aquichan 2005; 1(5):44-55.

7. Vega OM . Estructura del Conocimiento contemporáneo de Enfermería. Revista Ciencia y Cuidado. 2006; 3(3):53-68.

8. Sánchez B. Enfermería como disciplina. Ponencia presentada en XVII Coloquio Nacional de Investigación en Enfermería. Pontificia Universidad Javeriana. Octubre. 2005.

9. Fawcett J. Analysis and Evaluation of Contemporary Nursing knowledge: Nursing Models and Theories. Philadelphia. FA; Davis Co. 2000.

10. Reales E. Componentes y Visiones de Enfermería. Modelos y Teorías de Enfermería. Universidad Nacional de Colombia. Bogotá. 2001. p:31.

11. Rodrigo MT , Fernández C, Navarro MV. De la Teoría a la Práctica: Pensamiento de Virginia Henderson en el Siglo XXI. 2ª ed. Barcelona, Masson, 2000.

12. Durán MM . Marco Epistemológico de Enfermería. Aquichán 2002; 2(2): 7-18.

13. Chinn P, Jacobs M. Theory and Nursing. 5Th ed, St Louis, Mosby Company. 1987.

14. Peterson SJ, Bredow TS. Middle Range Theories: Application to Nursing Research. Philadelphia FA. Lippincott. 2004.

15. Blegen MA, Tripp-Reimer T. Implications of nursing taxonomies for middle –range theory development. Advances in Nursing Science. 1997; 19(3):37-49.

16. Smith MC. Disciplinary Perspectives Linked to Middle Range Theory. En: Smith MJ, Liehr PR (Eds). Middle Range Theories for Nursing. NY Springer Publishing Co. 2008. pp. 1-11.

17. Adam E. Contemporary Conceptualization of Nursing: Philosophy or Science?. En: JF Kikuchi y H. Simminis, (Eds). Philosophic Inquiry and Nursing. Newberry Park, Ca. Sage Publications. 1992, pp 55-63.

18. De Villalobos MM . Enfermería: Desarrollo Teórico e Investigativo. Bogotá. UNIBIBLO S. 2001.

19. Benner P. Descubriendo el conocimiento implicado en la práctica clínica de enfermería. De novicia a experto. Menlo Park, K. Addison-Wesley Publishing Co. 1989.