medigraphic.com
ISSN 0185-3252 (Print)
Revista de la Asociación Médica del Centro Médico ABC

2011, Number 1

<< Back Next >>

An Med Asoc Med Hosp ABC 2011; 56 (1)

Esmolol versus dexmedetomidine to moderate hemodynamic response to laryngoscopy and intubation

Cardona HG, Espíritu MMS, Montoya PTG, Jiménez RA, Urías RVEG, Valdez-Ortiz R, Olivares MH

Language: Spanish
References: 16
Page: 16-19
PDF size: 53.11 Kb.


ABSTRACT

Objective: To assess the effect of esmolol or dexmedetomidine to attenuate the detrimental hemodynamic response to laryngoscopy and tracheal intubation. Material and methods: 60 adult patients were included and divided in to three groups: one received esmolol, another dexmedetomidine, and placebo for the third group. Heart rate, systolic diastolic and mean blood pressure were measured before, during and after induction. Results: Hemodynamic parameters were statistically significant after laryngoscopy in the groups that received esmolol or dexmedetomidine. Conclusion: Esmolol or dexmedetomidine have similar efficacy to attenuate hemodynamic response during manipulation of the airway.


REFERENCES

  1. King BD, Harris LC, Greifenstein FE, Elder JD, Dripps RD. Reflex circulatory responses to direct laryngoscopy and tracheal intubation performed during general anesthesia. Anesthesiology 1951; 12: 556.

  2. Shribman AJ, Smith G, Achola J. Cardiovascular and catecholamine responses to laryngoscopy and tracheal intubation. Br J Anaesth 1987; 59: 295.

  3. Fox EJ, Sklar GS, Hill CH, Villanueva R, King BD. Complications related to the pressor response to endotracheal intubation. Anesthesiology 1977; 47: 524.

  4. Laurito CE, Baughman VL, Becker GL, Polek WV, Riegler FX, VadeBoncouer TR. Effects of aerosolized and/or intravenous lidocaine on hemodynamic responses to laryngoscopy and intubation in outpatients. Anesth Analg 1988; 67: 3 89.

  5. Kindler CH, Schumacher PG, Schneider MC, Urwyler A. Effects of intravenous lidocaine and/or esmolol on hemodynamic responses to laryngoscopy and intubation: A double-blind, controlled clinical trial. J Clin Anesth 1996; 8: 491.

  6. Atlee JL, Dhamee MS, Olund TL, George V. The use of esmolol, nicardipine, or their combination o blunt hemodynamic changes alter laryngoscopy and tracheal intubation. Anesth Analg 2000; 90: 280.

  7. Yildiz M, Tavlan A, Tuncer S, Reisli R, Yosunkaya A, Otelcioglu S. Effect of dexmedetomidine on haemodynamic responses to laryngoscopy and intubation. Drugs RD 2006; 7 (1): 43.

  8. Bedford RF. Circulatory responses to tracheal intubation. Bishop MJ. Physiology and consequences of tracheal intubation. Problems in Anesthesia 1988; 2: 201.

  9. Kil HK, Bishop MJ, Bedford RF. Physiologic and pathophysiologic responses to intubation. Anesthesiol Clin North Am 1995; 13: 361.

  10. Shribman AJ, Smith G, Achola KJ. Cardiovascular and catecholamine responses to laryngoscopy with and without tracheal intubation. Br J Anaesth 1987; 59: 295.

  11. El-Gaweet EI, Radnay PA, Hollinger I et al. Attenuation of hypertension and tachycardia following laryngoscopy and endotracheal intubation. Anest Analg 1984; 63: 209.

  12. Bernstein JS, Ebert TJ, Stowe DF et al. Single I.V. bolus esmolol prior to rapid sequence induction effectively blunts the intubation response. Anesth Analg 1989; 68: 524.

  13. Helfman SM, Gold MI, DeLisse EA et al. Which drug prevents tachycardia and hypertension associated with tracheal intubation: Lidocaine, fentanyl, or esmolol? Anesth Analg 1991; 72: 482.

  14. Villalonga A et al. La respuesta refleja a la laringoscopía y a la intubación traqueal. Rev Esp Anestesiol Reanim 1990; 37: 373-377.

  15. Figueredo E. Assessment of the efficacy of esmolol on the haemodynamic changes induced by laryngoscopy and tracheal intubation: A meta-analysis. Acta Anaesthesiol Scand 2001; 45: 1011-1022.

  16. Guler G. Single-dose dexmedetomidine attenuates airway and circulatory reflexes during extubation. Acta Anaesthesiol Scand 2005; 49: 1088-1091.




2020     |     www.medigraphic.com