2008, Number 4
<< Back Next >>
Arch Cardiol Mex 2008; 78 (4)
Improvement of diastolic function after regression of left ventricular hypertrophy
Teniente-Valente R, Solorio S, Vargas-Salado E, Aguirre-Vázquez C, Hernández-González MA, Olvera-Lopez JA, Rodríguez-Mariscal L, Luna-Ruiz MA, Guillén CJM, Murillo OBO
Language: English
References: 31
Page: 392-399
PDF size: 125.20 Kb.
ABSTRACT
Objective: To evaluate the diastolic function after regression of left ventricular hypertrophy, in mild to moderate hypertension treated with angiotensin converting enzyme(ACE) inhibitor and, if necessary, with a diuretic.
Methods: Ninety-eight hypertensive patients with left ventricular hypertrophy (LVH) and abnormal left ventricle diastolic function indexes received captopril (Capotena®) 50 to 200 mg/day plus chlortalidone during 12 months to reach blood pressure control, defined as a diastolic blood pressure £ 90 and systolic blood pressure £ 140 mm Hg. Left ventricular (LV) mass index was calculated by M mode and two-dimensional echocardiography, and left ventricular diastolic function was assessed by transmitral pulsed Doppler ultrasound every 3 months.
Results: Sixty-three patients were women and 35 were men, mean age was 53.4 ± 8.4 years (range 34-70). Thirty-six patients had mild (36.7%) and 62 (63.3%) moderate hypertension. Treatment reduced significantly both systolic pressure from 165 ± 13 to 137 ± 12.9 mm Hg (p ‹ 0.05) and diastolic pressure from 99 ± 8.6 to 86 ± 6.37 mm Hg (p ‹ 0.05). LV mass index decreased from 155.4 ± 32.9 to 121.7± 29.14 g/m
2 (p ‹ 0.05). Late diastolic filling velocity (A wave) and the ratio of E/A waves improved (p ‹ 0.05), but early diastolic filling velocity (E wave) and isovolumetric relaxation time did not change with treatment.
Conclusions: Some indexes of diastolic function improved after regression of left ventricular hypertrophy and good blood pressure control with captopril and chlortalidone.
REFERENCES
Levy D, Garrison RJ, Savage DD, Kannel WB, Castelli WP: Prognostic implications of echocardiographically determined left ventricular mass in The Framingahm heart study. N Engl J Med 1990; 322: 1561-1566.
Koren MJ, Devereux RB, Casale PN, Savage DD, Laragh JH: Relation of left ventricular mass and geometry to morbidity and mortality in uncomplicated essential hypertension. Ann Intern Med 1991; 114: 345-352.
Hanrath P, Mathey DG, Siegert R, Bleifeld W: Left ventricular relaxation and filling pattern in different forms of left ventricular hypertrophy: an echocardiographic study. Am J Cardiol 1980; 45: 15-23.
Fouad FM, Slominski JM, Tarazi RC: Left ventricular diastolic function in hypertension: relation to left ventricular mass and systolic function. J Am Coll Cardiol 1984; 3: 1500-6.
Dreslinski GR, Frohlich ED, Dunn FG, Messerli FH, Suarez DH, Reisin E: Echocardiographic diastolic ventricular abnormality in hypertensive heart disease: atrial emptying index. Am J Cardiol 1981; 47: 1087-1090.
Inouye I, Massie B, Loge D, Topic N, Silverstein D, Simpson P, Tubau J: Abnormal left ventricular filling: an early finding in mild to moderate systemic hypertension. Am J Cardiol 1984; 53: 120-126.
Hess OM, Schneider J, Koch R, Bamert C, Grimm J, Krayenbuehl HP: Diastolic function and myocardial structure in patients with myocardial hypertrophy. Circulation 1981; 63: 360-371.
Vasan RS, Larson MG, Benjamin EJ, Evans JC, Reiss CK, Levy D: Congestive heart failure in subjects with normal versus reduced left ventricular ejection fraction: prevalence and mortality in a population-based cohort. J Am Coll Cardiol. 1999; 33: 1948-1955.
Dahlof B, Pennert K, Hansson L: Reversal of left ventricular hypertrophy in hypertensive patients: a meta-analysis of 109 treatment studies. Am J Hypertens 1992; 5: 95-110.
Schmieder R, Martus P, Klingbeil A: Reversal of left ventricular hypertrophy in essential hypertension: a meta-analysis of randomized double-blind studies. JAMA 1996: 275: 1507-1513.
Gottdiener JS: Measuring diastolic function. J Am Coll Cardiol 1991; 18: 83-84.
Trimarco B, DeLuca N, Rosiello G, Ricciardelli B, Betocchi S, Filardi PP, et al: Improvement of diastolic function after reversal of left ventricular hypertrophy induced by long-term antihypertensive treatment with tertalol. Am J Cardiol 1989; 64: 745-751.
Muiesan ML, Agabiti-Rosei E, Romanelli G, Beschi M, Castellano M, Alari G, et al: Improved left ventricular systolic and diastolic function after regression of cardiac hypertrophy, treatment withdrawal, and redevelopment of hypertension. J Cardiovasc Pharmacol 1991; 17 (Suppl 2): S179-S181.
White WB, SchulmanP, Karimeddini, MK, Smith VE: Regression of left ventricular mass is accompanied by improvement in rapid left ventricular filling following antihypertensive therapy with metoprolol. Am Heart J 1989; 117: 145-150.
Motz W, Strauer BE: Left ventricular function and collagen content after regression of hypertensive hypertrophy. Hypertension 1989; 13: 43-50.
Inouye IK, Massie BM, Loge D, Simpson P, Tubau JF: Failure of antihypertensive therapy with diuretic, beta-blocking and calcium channel-blocking drugs to consistently reverse left ventricular diastolic filling abnormalities. Am J Cardiol 1984; 53: 1583-1587.
Sen S, Bumpus FM: Collagen synthesis in development and reversal of cardiac hypertrophy in spontaneously hypertensive rats. Am J Cardiol 1979; 44: 954-958.
Casale PN, Devereux RB, Milner M, Zullo G, Harshfield GA, Pickering TG, et al: Value of echocardiographic measurement of left ventricular mass in predicting cardiovascular morbid events in hypertensive men. Ann Intern Med 1986; 105: 173-178.
Nishimura RA, Abel MD, Hatle LK, Tajik AJ: Assessment of diastolic function of the heart: background and current applications of Doppler echocardiography. Part II. Clinical studies. Mayo Clin Proc 1989; 64: 181-204.
Sahn DJ, DeMaria A, Kisslo T: Committee on M-mode standardization of the American Society of Echocardiography: recommendations regarding quantitation in M-mode echocardiographic measurements. Circulation 1978; 58: 1072-1083.
Devereux RB: Detection of left ventricular hypertrophy by M-mode echocardiography. Anatomic validation, standardization, and comparison to other methods. Hypertension 1987; 9 (Suppl II): II19-II26.
Shahi M, Thom S, Poultier N, Sever PS, Foale RA: Regression of hypertensive left ventricular hypertrophy and left ventricular diastolic function. Lancet 1990; 336: 458-461.
Habib G, Mann DL, Zoghbi WA: Normalization of cardiac structure and function after regression of cardiac hypertrophy. Am Heart J 1994; 128: 333-343.
Szlachcic J, Tubau JF, Vollmer C, Massie B: Effect of diltiazem on left ventricular mass and diastolic filling in mild to moderate hypertension. Am J Cardiol 1989; 63: 198-201.
Solomon SD, Janardhanan R, Verma A, Bourgoun M, Daley WL, Purkayastha D, et al: Effect of angiotensin receptor blockade and antihypertensive drugs on diastolic function in patients with hypertension and diastolic dysfunction: a randomized trial. Lancet 2007; 369: 2079-2087.
Zakynthinos E, Pierutsakos Ch, Konstantinidis K, Zakynthinos S, Papadogiannis D: Losartan reduces left ventricular hypertrophy proportionally to blood pressure reduction in hypertensives, but does not affect diastolic cardiac function. Angiology 2004; 55: 669-678.
Barrios V, Escobar C, Calderón A, Tomás JP, Ruiz S, Moya JL, et al: Regression of left ventricular hypertrophy by a candesartan-based regimen in clinical practice. The VIPE study. J Renin Angiotensin Aldosterone Syst. 2006; 7: 236-42.
Villari B, Vassalli G, Monrad ES, Chiariello M, Turina M, Hess OM: Normalization of diastolic dysfunction in aortic stenosis late after valve replacement. Circulation 1995; 91: 2353-2358.
Bezante G P, Chen X, Molinari G, Valbusa A, Deferrari L, Sebastiani V, et al: Left ventricular myocardial mass determination by contrast enhanced colour Doppler compared with magnetic resonance imaging. Heart 2005; 91: 38-43.
Fopp M, Duncan BB, Rohde LEP: Echocardiography-based left ventricular mass estimation. How should we define hypertrophy? Cardiovascular Ultrasound 2005; 3: 17.
Lang RM, Bierig M, Devereux RB, Flachskampf FA, Foster E, Pellikka PA: Recommendations for chamber quantification. Eur J Echocardiography 2006; 7: 79-108.