2008, Number 2
<< Back Next >>
Arch Cardiol Mex 2008; 78 (2)
Accuracy of 64 slice computed tomography angiography in the diagnosis of ischemic coronary artery disease
Mendoza-Rodríguez V, Roberto LL, Milián-Sierra V, Linares-Machado R, Hernández–Cañero A, Llerena LD, Rodríguez- Nande L, López-Ferrero L
Language: Spanish
References: 31
Page: 162-170
PDF size: 200.64 Kb.
ABSTRACT
Introduction and objectives: Multislice computed tomography coronary angiography (MSCT–CA) has been developed in the last years. One of the advantages is to supply information of the lumen and wall of the vessels. The aim was to assess the diagnostic accuracy of MSCT – CA to detect significant coronary stenoses taking as gold standard the invasive coronary angiography (ICA).
Patients and methods: We studied, after informed consent, 64 consecutive patients (50 males). First MSCT – CA was performed and afterwards with a media of 45 days the ICA. Sensitivity (SENS), specificity (ESP), positive predictive value (PPV), negative predictive value (NPV) and predictive precision (PP) were assessed per patients, per arteries and per segments.
Results: The SENS, ESP, PPV, PNV and PP were 96.4, 91.2, 87, 96.8, 93.5% respectively per patients and 95.7, 97, 88.2, 98.9, 96.7% respectively per arteries and 91, 99, 89, 99.6, 98.7% respectively per segments. The diagnostic accuracy decreased in patients with heart rate higher than 65 beats per minute, as well as in patients with calcium scoring higher than 400 Agatston Units or body mass index with or higher than 30 kg/m
2 CS.
Conclusions: Our results suggest that MSCT – CA has a good accuracy, especially in the ESP and NPV for the diagnosis of significant coronary stenoses in selected patients with calcium scoring of 400 Agatston Units or lower, heart rate with 65 beats per minute or lower with regular rhythm and body mass index lower than 30 kg/m
2 CS.
REFERENCES
American Heart Association: 2002 Heart and stroke Statistical update Dallas, Tex: American Heart Association, 2005.
MINSAP: Anuario estadístico. Cuba, 2005.
Scanlon P, Faxon D, Audit A: Society for Cardiac Angiography and interventions. ACC-AHA guidelines for coronary angiography: a report of the American College of Cardiology/American Heart Association Task Force on practice guidelines (Committee on Coronary Angiography). J Am Coll Cardiol 1999;33:1756-1824.
Bashore TM, Bates ER, Berger PB: American College of Cardiology/Society for Cardiac Angiography and interventions Clinical Expert Consensus Document on Cardiac catheterization laboratory standards: report of American College of Cardiology Task Force on Clinical Expert Consensus Documents. J Am Coll Cardiol 2001;37: 2170–2214.
Mollet M, Cademartiri F, Nieman K: Multislice spiral computed tomography coronary angiography in patients with stable angina pectoris. J Am Coll Cardiol 2004;43:2265-2270.
Nieman K, Cademartiri F, Lemos PA, Raaijmakers R, Pattynama PM, de Feyter PJ, et al: Reliable noninvasive coronary angiography with fast submillimeter multislice spiral computed tomography. Circulation 2002;106:2051–2054.
Hernández RA, Fernández F, Borges JM, López R: Técnicas no invasivas de visualización de las arterias coronarias. Cardiología Intervencionista 2005. Revista Esp Cardiol 2006;59(Supl 1):38-49.
Ropers D, Baum U, Pohle K: Detection of coronary artery stenosis with thin slice multi - detector row spiral computed tomography and multiplanar reconstruction. Circulation 2003;107:664–666.
Hoffmann U, Moselewski F, Curi RC: Predictive value of 16 - slice multi - detector spiral computed tomography to detect significant obstructive coronary artery disease in patients at high risk for coronary artery disease patients versus segment-based analysis. Circulation 2004;110:2638–43.
Mollet NR, Cademartiri F, Krestin GP, Mc Fadden EP, Arampatsis CA, Serruys PW, et al: Improved diagnostic accuracy with 16 row multi-slice computed tomography coronary angiography. J Am Coll Cardiol 2005;45:128-132.
Kuetner A, Beck T, Drosch: Diagnostic accuracy of noninvasive coronary imaging using 16 detector slice spiral computed tomography with 188 ms temporal resolution. J Am Coll Cardiol 2005;45:123–127.
Raff GL, Gallagher MJ, ONeill WW, Goldstein JA, Willian WO, James A, et al: Diagnostic accuracy of noninvasive coronary angiography using 64 - slice spiral computed tomography. J Am Coll Cardiol 2005;46:52–57.
Siemens. Somaton Sensation Cardiac 64: Manual de aplicaciones. Versión del software syngo CT 2006A. 176-224.
Austen WG, Edwards JE, Fryz RL: A reporting system on patients evaluated for coronary artery disease. Report of the Ad – Hoc Committee for grading of coronary artery disease council on cardiovascular surgery. Circulation 1975;51:5-40.
Kelly H, James A, Laura M: Receiver – operating characteristic analysis for evaluating diagnostic tests and predictive models. Circulation 2007;115:654-657.
Achenbach S, Giesler T, Ropers D, Ulzheimer S, Derlien H, Schulte C, et al: Detection of coronary artery stenosis by contrast - enhanced, retrospectively electrocardiographically gated, multislice spiral computed tomography. Circulation 2001;103:2535-2538.
Kopp AF, Schroeder S, Kuettner A, Baumbach A, Georg C, Kuzor, et al: Non invasive coronary angiography with high resolution multi - detector-row computed tomography. Result in 102 patients. Eur Heart J 2002;23:1714–1725.
Nieman K, Oudkerm K, Rensing BJ, Van Oojen P, Munne A, Van Geons RJ, et al: Coronary angiography with multislice computed tomography. Lancet 2001;357:599-603.
Achenbach S, Ulzheimer S, Baum U, Kachelrie M, Ropers D, Giesler T, et al: Noninvasive coronary angiography by retrospectively ECG-gated multislice spiral. Circulation 2000;102:2823-2828.
Becker CR, Knez A, Leber A, Treede H, Ohnesorge B, Shoepf UJ, et al: Detection of coronary artery stenosis with multislice helical CT angiography. J Comput Assist Tomogr 2002;26:750-755.
Mortuscelli E, Romagnoli A, D´Eliseo A, Razzini C, Tomassini M, Sperandio M, et al: Accuracy of thin - slice computed tomography in the detection of coronary stenoses. Eur Heart J 2004;25:1043-1048.
Schoepf UJ, Becker CR, Ohnesorge BM, Yucel EK: CT of coronary artery disease. Radiology 2004;232:18–37.
Leschka S, Alkadhi H, Plass A, Desbiolles L, Grunenfelder J, Morince KB, et al: Accuracy of MSCT coronary angiography with 64-slice technology: First experience. Eur Heart J 2005;26:1482-1487.
Ropers D, Rixe J, Anders K, Kuttner A, Baum U, Bautz W, et al: Usefulness of multidetector row computer tomography with 64 – x06 mm collimation and 330ms rotation for the noninvasive detection of significant coronary artery stenoses. Am J Cardiol 2006;97:343–348.
Martin HK, Heshui S, Bernd LS, Florian TS, Michael L, Ralph S, et al: Non invasive coronary angiography with multislice computed tomography. JAMA 2005;293:2471-2478.
De Feyter PJ, Nieman K: Noninvasive multi - slice computed tomography coronary angiography: an emerging clinical modality. J Am Coll Cardiol 2004;44:1238-1240.
Leber AW, Knez A, Von Ziegler F, Becker A, Nikolaou K, Paul S, Paul S, et al: Quantification of obstructive and nonobstructive coronary lesions by 64 slices computed tomography: a comparative study with quantitative coronary angiography and intravascular ultrasound. J Am Coll Cardiol 2005;46:147–154.
Fine JJ, Hopkins CB, Ruff N, Newton FC: Comparison of accuracy of 64 slices cardiovascular computed tomography with coronary angiography in patients with suspected coronary artery disease. Am J Cardiol 2006;97:173–174.
Schuijf JD, Bax JJ, Shaw LJ, De Roos A, lamb HJ, Van Der Wall EE, et al: Meta–analysis of comparative diagnostic performance of magnetic resonance imaging and multislice computed tomography for non-invasive coronary angiography. Am Heart J 2006;151:404–411.
Stein PD, Beemath A, Kayali F, Skaf E, Sanchez J, Olson RE: Multidetector computed tomography for the diagnostic of coronary artery disease: a systemic review. Am J Med 2006;119:203–216.
Hoffman MH, Shi H, Schmitz BL: Noninvasive coronary angiography with multislice computed tomography. JAMA 2005;293:2471–2478.