medigraphic.com

2022, Number 2

<< Back Next >>

Revista Colombiana de Bioética 2022; 17 (2)

The interpersonal component of the personal condition: between attitudes of recognition and the inclusion of people with disabilities

Enriquez CY

Language: Spanish
References: 36
Page:
PDF size: 178.84 Kb.


ABSTRACT

Purpose/Background. Discuss the interpersonal component of the personal condition, showing how recognition attitudes determine the social inclusion of people with disabilities.
Methodology/Approach. A theoretical analysis was carried out on the interpersonal component of the human person, based on the argument of the inclusion of people with disabilities and its relevance for full citizen participation. The research is framed in the interpretive paradigm, with a qualitative nature, using as a technique the analysis of documents considered primary sources. Likewise, the theoretical approach of Paul Ricoeur regarding the forms of human recognition and the three basic forms of interpersonal recognition proposed by Axel Honneth were assumed.
Results/Findings. The interpersonal dimension is an important foundation of existence as a human community. The basic forms of recognition are reciprocal and, therefore, not unidirectional and coincide with being respected, loved, and valued for our contribution to the community. Living with people who do not have attitudes of recognition towards you is a reality with which people with disabilities are familiar.
Discussion/Conclusions/Contributions. To fully include people with disabilities, in addition to considering the modality of institutional and technical participation, it must consider the interpersonal dimension.


REFERENCES

  1. Asamblea General de las Naciones Unidas. 2013. “Outcome document of thehigh-level meeting of the General Assembly on the realization of the MillenniumDevelopment Goals and other internationally agreed development goals forpersons with disabilities: the way forward, a disability-inclusive developmentagenda towards 2015 and beyond.” Nueva York: Naciones Unidas. https://digitallibrary.un.org/record/764438

  2. Bach, Michael. 2002. “Social Inclusion as Solidarity: Rethinking the Child RightsAgenda.” The Laidlaw Foundation. https://laidlawfdn.org/assets/wpsosi_2002_june_social-inclusion-as-solidarity-1.pdf

  3. Bredewold, Femmianne, Evelien Tonkens y Margo Trappenburg. 2016. “Urbanencounters limited: The importance of built-in boundaries in contacts betweenpeople with intellectual or psychiatric disabilities and their neighbours.” UrbanStudies 53, no. 16: 3371-87. https://doi.org/10.1177/0042098015616895

  4. Buber, Martin. 2017. Yo y tú. Barcelona: Herder Editorial.

  5. Calderón-Almendros, Ignacio, Mel Ainscow, Silvia Bersanelli y Pamela Molina-Toledo.2020. “Educational inclusion and equity in Latin America: An analysis ofthe challenges.” Prospects 49, no. 3: 169-86. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11125-020-09501-1

  6. Congdon, Matthew. 2020. “The struggle for recognition of what?” European Journalof Philosophy 28, no. 3: 586-601. https://doi.org/10.1111/ejop.12525

  7. Enriquez Canto, Yordanis. 2018a. “Discapacidad: una heurística para la condiciónhumana”. Revista bioética 18, no. 26(2): 207-16. https://doi.org/10.1590/1983-

  8. 804220182622418. Enriquez Canto, Yordanis. 2018b. “Estatus personal en la discapacidad intelectual:considerando las capacidades cognitivas.” Revista Latinoamericana de Bioética18, no. 35(2): 226-41.

  9. Forst, Rainer. 2017. Normativity and power: Analyzing social orders of justification.Reino Unido: Oxford University Press.

  10. Fowers, Blaine y Austen R. Anderson. 2018. “Aristotelian philia, contemporaryfriendship, and some resources for studying close relationships.” En The theoryand practice of virtue education, editado por Tom Harrison y David Ian Walker,184-196. Inglaterra: Routledge.

  11. Frankfurt, Harry G. 2004. The reasons of love. Estados Unidos: PrincetonUniversity Press.

  12. Fraser, Nancy y Axel Honneth. 2003. Redistribution or recognition?: a political-philosophicalexchange. Estados Unidos: Verso.

  13. Goodley, Dan. 2016. Disability studies: An interdisciplinary introduction. Estados Unidos:Sage.

  14. Hernández-Sampieri, Roberto, Carlos Fernández Collado y Pilar Baptista Lucio.2018. Metodología de la investigación. Vol. 4. México: McGraw-Hill Interamericana.

  15. Honneth, Axel. 1995. The Struggle for Recognition - The Moral and Political Grammarof Social Conflicts. Cambridge: Polity Press.Honneth, Axel. 2008. Recognition - A New Look At An Old Ideal. Reino Unido: OxfordUniversity Press.

  16. Ikäheimo, Heikki y Arto Laitinen. 2017. “Analysing Recognition: Identification,Acknowledgement and Recognitive Attitudes Between Persons.” En: Recognitionand Power: Axel Honneth and the Tradition of Critical Social Theory, editado por B.van den Brink & D. Owen, 33-56. Londres: Cambridge University Press.

  17. Ikäheimo, Heikki. 2007. “Recognizing persons.” Journal of Consciousness Studies 14,no. 5-6: 224-47.

  18. Ikäheimo, Heikki. 2009. “Personhood and the social inclusion of people with disabilities.”En Arguing about disability philosophical perspectives, editado por KristiansenK., Vehmas S. y Shakespeare T., 77-92. Inglaterra: Routledge.Kim, Kyung Mee, Yu Ri Shin, Dong Chul Yu y Dong Ki Kim. 2016. “The meaningof social inclusion for people with disabilities in South Korea.” InternationalJournal of Disability, Development and Education 64, no. 1: 19-32. https://doi.org/10.1080/1034912X.2016.1165802

  19. Kittay, E. F. y Carlson L. 2010. Cognitive disability and its challenge to moral philosophy.Reino Unido: John Wiley & Sons.

  20. Laitinen, Arto. 2002. “Interpersonal recognition: A response to value or aprecondition of personhood?.” Inquiry 45, no. 4: 463-78. https://doi.org/10.1080/002017402320947559

  21. Maslow, Abraham y K. J. Lewis. 1987. “Maslow’s hierarchy of needs.” Salenger Incorporated14, no. 17: 987-90.

  22. Mead, George Herbert. 2015. Mind, self, and society: The definitive edition. EstadosUnidos: University of Chicago Press.

  23. Nevala, Nina, Irmeli Pehkonen, Inka Koskela, Johanna Ruusuvuori y Heidi Anttila.2015. “Workplace accommodation among persons with disabilities: a systematicreview of its effectiveness and barriers or facilitators.” Journal of occupationalrehabilitation 25, no. 2: 432-48. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10926-014-9548-z

  24. ONU. 2006. “Convención sobre los derechos de las personas con discapacidad.”Art. 30; Numeral 2. https://www.un.org/esa/socdev/enable/documents/tccconvs.pdf

  25. Pinilla-Roncancio, Mónica. 2018. “The reality of disability: Multidimensional povertyof people with disability and their families in Latin America.” Disability andhealth journal 11, no. 3: 398-404. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.dhjo.2017.12.007

  26. Pols, Jeannette. 2016. “Analyzing social spaces: Relational citizenship for patientsleaving mental health care institutions.” Medical Anthropology 35, no. 2: 177-92.https://doi.org/10.1080/01459740.2015.1101101

  27. Quinn, G., Degener T. y Bruce A. 2002. Human rights and disability: The current useand future potential of United Nations human rights instruments in the context of disability.Suiza: United Nations Publications.

  28. Ricoeur, Paul. 2004. Parcours de la reconnaissance. Paris: Stock.

  29. Sen, Amartya. 2017. “What Do We Want From a Theory of Justice?” En Theoriesof Justice, editado por Tom Campbell y Alejandra Mancilla, 27-50. Nueva York:Routledge.

  30. Sgreccia, Elio. 2013. “Persona humana y personalismo.” Cuadernos de bioética 24,no. 1: 115-23. https://www.redalyc.org/pdf/875/87527461012.pdf

  31. Simplican, Stacy, Geraldine Leader, John Kosciulek y Michael Leahy. 2015. “Definingsocial inclusion of people with intellectual and developmental disabilities:An ecological model of social networks and community participation.” Research in developmental disabilities 38: 18-29. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ridd.2014.10.008

  32. Spaemann, Robert. 2007. Persons: The difference between ‘someone’ and ‘something’.Inglaterra: Oxford University Press.

  33. Thompson, Simon. 2006. Political Theory of Recognition: A Critical Introduction. Cambridge:Polity Press.

  34. Titchkosky, Tanya. 2014. “Monitoring disability: The question of the ‘human’. inhuman rights projects.” En: Disability, human rights and the limits of humanitarianism,editado por Gill M y Schlund-Vials C. J., 119-35. Nueva York: Routledge.

  35. Unicef. 2019. “Children and adolescents with disabilities”. Panama: Unicef. https://www.unicef.org/lac/en/children-and-adolescents-disabilities

  36. Yeo, Rebecca y Karen Moore. 2003. “Including disabled people in poverty reductionwork: ‘Nothing about us, without us’.” World development 31, no. 3: 571-90.https://doi.org/10.1016/S0305-750X(02)00218-8




2020     |     www.medigraphic.com