medigraphic.com
ISSN 1659-1046 (Print)
Odovtos - International Journal of Dental Sciences

2020, Number 2

<< Back Next >>

Odovtos-Int J Dent Sc 2020; 22 (2)

Influence of pH Value of Bleaching Gels on Surface Roughness of Bovine Enamel

Lugo-Varillas JG, Tinedo-López PL, Watanabe OG, Correa MA, Álvarez VE, Hermoza NM

Language: Spanish
References: 27
Page: 113-123
PDF size: 351.54 Kb.


ABSTRACT

Objective: The purpose of this study was to evaluate the influence of the pH levels of three in-office bleaching gels on the surface roughness of bovine enamel, after the bleaching protocol. Materials and methods: 36 samples of bovine enamel were obtained, which were cut and divided into three groups (n=12): 40%hydrogen peroxide (Opalescence Boost40%), 35% hydrogen peroxide (Whiteness HP AutoMixx) and 35% hydrogen peroxide (Whiteness HP Blue), receiving a 40-minute application of bleaching. The average pH values were determined using a pH meter during the initial and final application of the gel. A roughness meter was used to assess surface roughness (Ra) before and after bleaching. Data were analyzed with the Friedmann and wilcoxon test (difference between groups); the Kruskall Wallis and U Mann test (difference in each group), as well as Pearson or Spearman test for correlation. Results: There is an increase in pH values from the beginning to the end of bleaching in all groups, except for the 35% hydrogen peroxide group (Whiteness HP Automixx). For surface roughness results there is an increase in all groups. No correlation was found between pH values of the bleaching gels and the surface roughness of the enamel after bleaching. Conclusions: Hydrogen peroxide bleaching gels with high concentrations that have a high or low pH could cause alterations in the surface of the tooth enamel, such as increase in surface roughness.


REFERENCES

  1. Torres C.R., Crastechini E., Feitosa F.A., Pucci C.R., Borges A.B. Influence of pH on the effectiveness of hydrogen peroxide whitening. Oper Dent. 2014; 39 (6): E261-8.

  2. Jurema A.L., De souza M.Y., Gomes C.R., Borges A.B., Ferraz T.M. Effect of pH on whitening efficacy of 35% hydrogen peroxide and enamel microhardness. J Esthet Restor Dent. 2018; 30 (2): E39-44.

  3. Kwon S.R., Wertz P.W. Review of the Mechanism of Tooth Whitening. J Esthet Restor Dent. 2015; 27 (5): 240-57.

  4. Cvikl B., Lussi A., Moritz A., Flury S. Enamel Surface Changes After Exposure to Bleaching Gels Containing Carbamide Peroxide or Hydrogen Peroxide. Oper Dent. 2016; 41(1): E39-47.

  5. Dahl J.E., Pallesen V. Tooth bleaching a critical review of the Biological Aspects. Crit Rev Oral Biol Med. 2003; 14 (4): 292-304.

  6. Freire A., Archegas L.R., de Souza E.M., Vieira S. Effect of storage temperature on pH of in office and at home dental bleaching agents. Acta Odontol.Latinoam. 2000; 22 (1): 27-31.

  7. Hoppenbrouwers P.M., Driessens F.C., Borggreven J.M. The mineral solubility of human tooth roots. Arch Oral Biol. 1987; 32 (5): 319-22.

  8. Barron P.B., Carmichael R.P., Marcon M.A., Sandor G.K.B. Dental Erosion in Gastroesophageal Reflux Disease. Can Dent Assoc. 2003; 69 (2): 84-9.

  9. Soares A., et al. Influence of pH, bleaching agents, and acid etching on surface wear of bovine enamel. J Appl Oral Sci. 2016; 24 (1): 24-30.

  10. Dawes C. What is the critical pH and why does a tooth dissolve in acid? J Can Dent Assoc. 2003;69 (11): 722-4.

  11. Hughes J.A., West N.X., Parker D.M., van den Braak M.H., Addy M. Effects of pH and concentration of citric, malic and lactic acids on enamel, in vitro. J Dent. 2000; 28 (2): 147-52.

  12. Grobler S. R., Majeed A., Moola M. H. The pH of various tooth-whitening products on the South African market. SADJ. 2011; 66 (6): 278-81.

  13. Barac R., Gasic J., Trutic N., Sunarics S., Popovic J., Djeklc P. Erosive Effect of different Soft Drinks on enamel surface in vitro: application of stylus profilometry. Med Princ Pract. 2015; 24: 421-57.

  14. Pinto C.F., Oliveira R.d., Cavalli V., Giannini M. Peroxide bleaching agent effects on enamel surface microhardness, roughness and morphology. Braz Oral Res. 2004; 18 (4): 306-11.

  15. Mohammed Q. Tooth-bleaching procedures and their controversial effects: A literature review. Saudi Dent J. 2014; 26 (2): 33-46.

  16. Trentino A., et Al. Evaluation of pH levels and surface roughness after bleaching and abrasion tests of eight commercial products. Photomed Laser Surg. 2015; 33 (7): 372-7.

  17. Loguercio A. D., Servat F., Stanislawczuk R., Mena-Serrano A., Rezende M., Prieto M. V., Cereño V., Rojas M.F., Ortega K., Fernandez E., Reis A. Effect of acidity of in-office bleaching gels on tooth sensitivity and whitening: a two-center double-blind randomized clinical trial. Clin Oral Investig. 2017; 21 (9): 2811.

  18. Price R.B., Sedarous M., Hiltz G.S. The pH of tooth-whitening products. J Car Dent Assoc. 2000; 66.(8): 421-6.

  19. Sa Y., Chen D., Liu Y., Wen W., Xu M., Jiang T., Wang Y. Effects of two in-office bleaching agents with different pH values on enamel surface structure and color: an in situ vs. in vitro study. J Dent. 2012; 40 Suppl 1: e26-34.

  20. Xu B.L., Li Q., Wang Y. Effects of pH values of hydrogen peroxide bleaching agents on enamel surface properties. Oper Dent. 2011; 36 (5): 554-62.

  21. Mondelli R.F., Azevedo J.F., Francisconi P.A., Ishikiriama S.K., Mondelli J. Wear and surface roughness of bovine enamel submitted to bleaching. Eur J Esthet Dent. 2009; 4 (4): 396-403.

  22. Cavalli V., Arrais C.A., Giannini M., Ambrosano G.M. High-concentrated carbamide peroxide bleaching agents effects on enamel surface. J Oral Rehabil. 2004; 31 (2): 155-9.

  23. Sun L., Liang S., Sa Y., Wang Z., Ma X., Jiang T., Wang Y. Surface alteration of human tooth enamel subjected to acidic and neutral 30% hydrogen peroxide. J Dent. 2011; 39 (10): 686-92.

  24. Yassen G.H., Platt J.A., Hara A.T. Bovine teeth as substitute for human teeth in dental research: a review of literature. J Oral Sci. 2011; 53 (3): 273-82.

  25. Nakamichi I., Iwaku M., Fusayama T. Bovine Teeth as Possible Substitutes in the Adhesion Test. J Dent Res. 1983; 62 (10): 1076-81.

  26. Ortiz-Ruiz A.J., Teruel-Fernández J.D., Alcolea-Rubio L.A., Hernández-Fernández A., Martínez-Beneyto Y., Gispert-Guirado F. Structural differences in enamel and dentin in human, bovine, porcine, and ovine teeth. Ann Anat. 2018; 218: 7-17.

  27. Laurance-Young P.L., Bozec L., Gracia L., Rees G., Lippert F., Lynch R.J., Knowles J.C. A review of the structure of human and bovine dental hard tissues and their physicochemical behaviour in relation to erosive challenge and remineralisation. J Dent. 201; 39 (4): 266-72.




2020     |     www.medigraphic.com