Arias R, Carrasco R, Bersezio C, Chaple GAM, Fernandez GE

Language: Spanish
References: 14
Page: 1-14
PDF size: 478.33 Kb.

ABSTRACT

Introduction: Dentin permeability is defined as the passage of fluids, ions, particles, molecules and bacteria through the dentin under certain conditions. Objective: Determine the effect of the active application of a dentin adhesive with an improved applicator on human dentin hydraulic conductance in vitro. Methods: An in vitro experimental study was conducted of 40 caries-free third molars with an indication of exodontia from healthy patients aged 15-30 years, prior informed consent. The molars were cleaned, disinfected and preserved to be included in epoxy resin blocks. Cross-sectional cuts were then made to obtain dentin discs 1.5 mm thick and 25 mm in diameter. These were divided into two 20-unit groups, were subjected to etching with 37 % orthophosphoric acid, and were washed and dried. On a precision scale photopolymerizable dentin adhesive was applied, recording the force exerted. Application was performed with a Microbrush applicator in Group 1 and with an improved dedicated applicator in Group 2. The samples were then placed in a diffusion chamber to determine flow rate and subsequently estimate hydraulic conductance, thus obtaining information about dentin permeability. Results: Results were slightly lower in Group 2, but they displayed normal distribution. Conclusions: Statistical analysis with various tests did not find any significant differences in hydraulic conductance values, nor could an inverse relation be established between the force of active application of an adhesive with an improved applicator and hydraulic conductance. Therefore, use of that instrument is not advised.

REFERENCES

1. Hevia J, Fresno C, Martín J , Moncada G , Letelier C , Oliveira Junior OB , Fernández E. Modelo de conductancia hidráulica de la dentina humana ex vivo. Rev Clin Periodoncia Implantol Rehabil Oral. 2013;6(3):114-7.

2. Estay J, Martin J, Vildósola P, Villablanca C, Mjör I, Laske M, et al. Sealing of restorations with marginal defects does not affect their longevity. American Journal of Dentistry. 2018;31(2):107-12.

3. Romero MA, Bersezio C, Vildósola P, Lletelier C, Batista Oliveira Jr O, Martín J, et al. Comparación de la conductancia hidráulica dentinaria, de acuerdo al tiempo de aplicación de desensibilizantes con base de oxalatos. Revista Facultad de Odontología Universidad de Antioquia. 2015;26(2):336-57.

4. Corral Nunez C, Covarrubias C, Fernandez E, Oliveira BD Junior. Enhanced bioactive properties of BiodentineTM modified with bioactive glass nanoparticles. Journal of Applied Oral Science. 2017;25(2):177-85.

5. Rocha Maia R, Oliveira D, D'Antonio T, Qian F, Skiff F. Comparison of light-transmittance in dental tissues and dental composite restorations using incremental layering build-up with varying enamel resin layer thickness. Restorative Dentistry & Endodontics. 2018;43(2).

6. Brännström M. The hydrodynamic theory of dentinal pain: sensation in preparations, caries, and the dentinal crack syndrome. Journal of Endodontics. 1986;12(10):453-7.

7. Moncada G, García Fonseca R, de Oliveira OB, Fernández E, Martín J, Vildósola P. Rol del 10-metacriloxidecilfosfato dihidrogenado en el cambio de paradigma de los sistemas adhesivos integrados en la dentina. Revista Clínica De Periodoncia, Implantología y Rehabilitación Oral. 2014;7(3):194-9.

8. Reis A, Carrilho M, Breschi L, Loguercio A. Overview of clinical alternatives to minimize the degradation of the resin-dentin bonds. Operative Dentistry. 2013;38(4):E103-E27.

9. Perdigão J, Loguercio AD. Universal or multi-mode adhesives: why and how? The Journal of Adhesive Dentistry. 2014;16(2):193-4.

10. Yoshihara K, Yoshida Y, Nagaoka N, Hayakawa S, Okihara T, De Munck J, et al. Adhesive interfacial interaction affected by different carbon-chain monomers. Dental Materials. 2013;29(8):888-97.

11. Muñoz M, Luque-Martinez I, Malaquias P, Hass V, Reis A, Campanha N, et al. In vitro longevity of bonding properties of universal adhesives to dentin. Operative Dentistry. 2015;40(3):282-92.

12. Cuadros-Sanchez J, Szesz A, Hass V, Patzlaff RT, Reis A, Loguercio AD. Effects of sonic application of adhesive systems on bonding fiber posts to root canals. Journal of Endodontics. 2014;40(8):1201-5.

13. De Munck J, Van Landuyt K, Peumans M, Poitevin A, Lambrechts P, Braem M, et al. A critical review of the durability of adhesion to tooth tissue: methods and results. Journal of Dental Research. 2005;84(2):118-32.

14. Ayar MK. A review of ethanol wet-bonding: Principles and techniques. European Journal of Dentistry. 2016;10(1):155.