2019, Number 6
<< Back Next >>
Acta Ortop Mex 2019; 33 (6)
Correlation between clavicle shortening with the function of thoracic extremity in patients operated by clavicle fractures
Pantaleón-Fierros E
Language: Spanish
References: 13
Page: 382-385
PDF size: 103.06 Kb.
ABSTRACT
Introduction: The collarbone is the only bone that joins the axial skeleton with the appendicular, during the function of the thoracic limb a shortening implies a decrease in strength and function since it acts as a lever, where the greater the shortening, the smaller will be the force produced. Factors such as multifragmentation, bone loss and reabsorption of the edges of the fragments are some limiting to the restitution of the clavicular length. How much might a shortening of the collarbone affect the function of the upper limb?
Material and methods: A retrospective and non-probabilistic cross-sectional study was conducted in surgically treated clavicular fracture patients. Shortening was measured in millimeters on postoperative X-Ray, dash scale was subsequently applied to determine the degree of function.
Results: 12 patients, average age 37 ± 17.7 years. 2 women and 10 men. 5 on the right side and 7 left side. Statistical analysis was performed with Pearson correlation coefficient. Average shortening 13.32 ± 9.9 mm. Average scale of DASH 6.0 ± 3.
Discussion: Moderate correlation with limitation in function in shortenings ≥ 1 cm, as well as clinical significance on the DASH scale from 6 points, 4 less than what the literature marks. With this, it can be determined that patients managed with or without surgery, with a shortening › 1 cm will have a considerable limitation in the function of the shoulder and upper limb.
REFERENCES
Altamimi SA, McKee MD Canadian Orthopaedic Trauma Society. Nonoperative treatment compared with plate fixation f displaced midshaft clavicular fractures. Surgical technique. J Bone Joint Surg Am. 2008; 90: 1-8.
Postacchini F, Gumina S, De Santis P, Albo F. Epidemiology of clavicle fractures. J Shoulder Elbow Surg. 2002; 11: 452-6.
Pearson AM, Tosteson AN, Koval KJ, McKee MD, Cantu RV, Bell JE, et al. Is surgery for displaced, midshaft clavicle fractures in adults cost-effective? results based on a multicenter randomized, controlled trial. J Orthop Trauma. 2010; 24(7): 426-433.
Hillen RJ, Burger BJ, Poll RG, de GA, Robinson CM. Malunion after midshaft clavicle fractures in adults. Acta Orthop. 2010; 81(3): 273-9.
Zlowodzki M, Zelle BA, Cole PA, Jeray K, McKee MD, Trauma Working Group. Treatment of acute midshaft clavicle fractures: systematic review of 2,144 fractures: on behalf of the Evidence-Based Orthopaedic. J Orthop Trauma. 2005; 19(7): 504-7.
Shen JW, Tong PJ, Qu HB. A three-dimensional reconstruction plate for displaced midshaft fractures of the clavicle. J Bone Joint Surg Br. 2008; 90(11): 1495-8.
Nordqvist A, Redlund-Johnell I, von Scheele A, Petersson CJ. Shortening of clavicle after fracture. Incidence and clinical significance, a 5-year follow-up of 85 patients. Acta Orthop Scand. 1997; 68(4): 349-51.
Gossard JM. Closed treatment of displaced middle-third fractures of the clavicle gives poor results. J Bone Joint Surg Br. 1998; 80(3): 558.
Nowak J, Holgersson M, Larsson S. Can we predict long-term sequelae after fractures of the clavicle based on initial findings? A prospective study with nine to ten years of follow-up. J Shoulder Elbow Surg. 2004; 13(5): 479-86.
Postacchini R, Gumina S, Farsetti P, Postacchini F. Long-term results of conservative management of midshaft clavicle fracture. Int Orthop. 2010; 34(5): 731-6.
Hudak PL, Amadio PC, Bombardier C. Development of an upper Extremity outcome measure: the DASH (disabilities of the arm, Shoulder, and hand) [corrected]. The Upper Extremity Collaborative Group (UECG). Am J Ind Med. 1996; 29(6): 602-8
Hervas MT, Navarro MJ, Peiro S. Versión española del cuestionario DASH. Adaptación transcultural, fiabilidad, validez y sensibilidad a los cambios. Med Clin. 2006; 127(12): 441-7.
Browner WS, Black D, Newman TB, Hulley S. Estimación del tamaño de la muestra y de la potencia. En: Hulley SB, Cummings S. Diseño de la investigación clínica. Edición española. Baltimore, EUA: Edición Doyma; 2008.