Carriedo-Rico EG, García-Morato-Jorreto P

Language: Spanish
References: 14
Page: 376-381
PDF size: 197.21 Kb.

ABSTRACT

Anterior cruciate ligament injury (ACL) of the knee is a severe traumatic injury that greatly decreases the function and sometimes leaves very important sequelae for the young patient so surgery for ligament reconstruction is the suitable treatment, there are several techniques for the elaboration of tunnels with difference in the portals, the methods of fixation and the different grafts used and each one of the authors defend their techniques giving their advantages and disadvantages and possible complications associated. The objective of this study was to assess the advantages or not of two approaches to the femoral side for the passage of the graft or implants. Material and methods: Two similar groups in this observational, transversal, retrospective and analytical study in patients operated by the same surgeon and assistants. In a period of time of three year, 80 patients were operated, 42 of them by medial portal and 38 of them via trans tibial. Results: The male sex in both groups was the predominant one, the parameters of ease were assessed to observe the passage of the tendon or graft, the passage of the femoral implant, the ease of the implant grip, the tension of the same and the operative time in both groups. The result was conclusive being an › p 0.06 contemplating the best result in patients operated by medial portal.

REFERENCES

1. Murray AW, Macnicol MF. 10-16 year results of Leeds-Keio anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction. Knee. 2004;11(1):9-14.

2. Chambat P, Guier C, Sonnery-Cottet B, Fayard J-M, Thaunat M. The evolution of ACL reconstruction over the last fifty years. Int Orthop. 2013;37(2):181-6.

3. Desai N, Andernord D, Sundemo D, Alentorn-Geli E, Musahl V, Fu F, et al. Revision surgery in anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction a cohort study of 17,682 patients from the Swedish National Knee Ligament Register. Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc. 2017;25(5):1542-52.

4. Tibor L, Cjan PH, TT, Wyatt R, Maletis GB, Inacio MC. Surgical technique Trends in primary ACL Reconstruction from 2007 to 2004. J Bone Joint Surg Am. 2016;98(13):1079-89.

5. Schimdler OS. The story of anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction. J Pertoper Pract. 2012;22(5):163-71.

6. Shelbourne KD, Gray T. Results of anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction based on meniscus and articular cartilage status at the time of surgery. Am J Sports Med. 2000;28(4):446-52.

7. Tudisco C, Bisicchia S. Knee stability, athletic performance and sport-specific tasks in non-professional soccer players after ACL reconstruction: comparing trans-tibial and antero-medial portal techniques. Muscles Ligaments Tendons J. 2015;5(3):175-80.

8. Barclay F. Transition from transtibial to medial portal ACL reconstruction mitin de arthromiami.

9. Harner CD, Honkamp NJ, Ranawat AS. Anteromedial portal technique for creating anterior cruciate ligament femoral tunnel. Arthroscopy. 2008;24(1):113-5.

10. Herbort M, Domicick C, Raschke MJ, Lenschow S, Förster T, Petersen W, et al. Comparison of knee kinematics after single-bundle anterior cruciate reconstruction via the medial portal technique with a central femoral tunnel a human cadaveric study. Am J Sport Med. 2016;44(1):126-32.

11. Dominick C, Herbport M, Raschke MJ, Bremer S, Schliemann B, Petersen W, Zantoop T. Convention alover-thetop-airming devices with short offset fail to hol the centrer of the human ACL footprint in medialportal technique, whereas media-portal. Archives of Orthpaedic and trauma Surgery. 2016;136(4):499-505.

12. Lubowitz J. Anteromedial portal technique for anterior cruciate ligament femoral socket pit fall and solution. Arthroscopy. 2009;25(1):95-101.

13. Robin EN, Lubowtz JH. Disadvantage and advantages of transtibial technique for creating the anterior cruciate ligament femoral socket. J Knee Surg. 2014;27(5):327-30.

14. Cirugia dificil del LCA historia. Knee surg sport Traumat Arthroscopy. 2012; 25-47.