Peregrino HED, Guzmán CCA, Mendoza AG

Language: Spanish
References: 23
Page: 65-68
PDF size: 220.91 Kb.

ABSTRACT

The recession of the gingiva or marginal gingival tissue is denoted based on the displacement of the marginal gingival tissue towards the apical of the cement-enamel junction, exposing the root surface. The present pathology presents a very diverse course, which is influenced by factors (abrasive brushing technique, extremely hard toothbrush, thin gingival biotype and secondary occlusion trauma). In this sense, there are various surgical techniques evoked to the treatment of soft tissue apical migration; in this way the Coronal Advance Flap is and the Tunnel technique are predictable technique, showing favorable results in terms of root coverage. The various studies show a high success rate for both techniques, in contrast, there are no reviews based on the use of EMD in the treatment of root coverage.

REFERENCES

1. Kassab MM, Cohen RE. The etiology and prevalence of gingival recession. J Am Dent Assoc. 2014;134 (2): 220-225.

2. Chrysanthakopoulos N. Gingival recession: prevalence and risk indicators among young greek adults. J Clin Exp Dent. 2014; 6 (3): 243-249.

3. Mythri S, Arunkumar SM, Hegde S, Rajesh SK, Munaz M, Ashwin D. Etiology and occurrence of gingival recession. J Indian Soc Periodontol. 2015; 19 (6): 671-675.

4. Guttiganur N, Aspalli S, Sanikop MV, Desai A, Gaddale R, Devanoorkar A. Classification systems for gingival recession and suggestion of a new classification system. Indian J Dent Res. 2018; 29: 233-237.

5. Heasman PA, Holliday R, Bryant A, Preshaw PM. Evidence for the occurrence of gingival recession and non-carious cervical lesions as a consequence of traumatic toothbrushing. J Clin Periodontol. 2015; 42 (Suppl. 16): S237-S255. doi: 10.1111/jcpe.12330.

6. Rebele SF, Zuhr O, Schneider D, Jung RE, Hürzeler MB. Tunnel technique with connective tissue graft versus coronally advanced flap with enamel matrix derivative for root coverage: a RCT using 3D digital measuring methods. Part II. Volumetric studies on healing dynamics and gingival dimensions. J Clin Periodontol. 2014; 41 (6): 593-603.

7. Vincent-Bugnas S, Charbit Y, Lamure J, Mahler P, Dard MM. Modified tunnel technique combined with enamel matrix derivative: a minimally invasive treatment for single or multiple class I recession defects. J Esthet Restor Dent. 2015; 27 (3): 145-154.

8. Miller P. A classification of marginal tissue recession. Int J Periodontics Restorative Dent. 1985; 4 (2): 8-13.

9. Grupe H, Warren R. Repair of gingival defects by a sliding flap operation. Journal of Periodontology. 1956; 27: 92-95.

10. Allen AL. Use of the supraperiosteal envelope in soft tissue grafting for root coverage. II. Rationale technique. Int J Periodontics Restorative Dent. 1994; 14: 302-315.

11. Allen EP, Cummings LC. The role of periodontal plastic surgery in esthetic dentistry. Tex Dent J. 2002; 119, 1008- 1015.

12. Restrepo O. Coronally repositioned flap: report of four cases. J Periodontol. 1973; 44: 564-567.

13. Miron RJ, Sculean A, Cochran DL, Froum S, Zucchelli G, Nemcovsky C et al. Twenty years of enamel matrix derivative: the past, the present and the future. J Clin Periodontol. 2016; 43 (8): 668-683. https://doi.org/10.1111/jcpe.12546.

14. Potârnichie O, Solomon S, Păsărin L, Mârţu A, Niţescu DC, Mârţu S. Statistical study on the prevalence of gingival recession in young adults. International Journal of Medical Dentistry. 2013; 3 (3): 219-224.

15. Zucchelli G, Tavelli L, Barootchi S, Stefanini M, Rasperini G, Valles C et al. The influence of tooth location on the outcomes of multiple adjacent gingival recessions treated with coronally advanced flap: a multicenter re-analysis study. J Periodontol. 2019; 90 (11): 1244-1251.

16. Cairo F, Nieri M, Pagliaro U. Efficacy of periodontal plastic surgery procedures in the treatment of localized facial gingival recessions. A systematic review. J Clin Periodontol. 2014; 41 (Suppl 15): S44-62.

17. Rebele SF, Zuhr O, Schneider D, Jung RE, Hürzeler MB. Tunnel technique with connective tissue graft versus coronally advanced flap with enamel matrix derivative for root coverage: a RCT using 3D digital measuring methods. Part II. Volumetric studies on healing dynamics and gingival dimensions. J Clin Periodontol. 2014; 41: 593-603. doi: 10.1111/jcpe.12254.

18. Zuhr O, Rebele SF, Schneider D, Jung RE, Hürzeler MB. Tunnel technique with connective tissue graft versus coronally advanced flap with enamel matrix derivative for root coverage: a RCT using 3D digital measuring methods. Part I. Clinical and patient-centred outcomes. J Clin Periodontol. 2013; 41: 582-592. doi: 10.1111/ jcpe.12178.

19. Sculean A, Cosgarea R, Stähli A, Katsaros C, Arweiler NB, Miron RJ et al. Treatment of multiple adjacent maxillary Miller class I, II, and III gingival recessions with the modified coronally advanced tunnel, enamel matrix derivative, and subepithelial connective tissue graft: a report of 12 cases. Quintessence Int. 2016; 47 (8): 653-659.

20. Santamaria MP, Neves FL, Silveira CA, Mathias IF, Fernandes-Dias SB, Jardini MA et al. Connective tissue graft and tunnel or trapezoidal flap for the treatment of single maxillary gingival recessions: a randomized clinical trial. J Clin Periodontol. 2017; 44 (5): 540-547.

21. Tavelli L, Barootchi S, Nguyen TVN, Tattan M, Ravidà A, Wang HL. Efficacy of tunnel technique in the treatment of localized and multiple gingival recessions: a systematic review and a meta-analysis. J Periodontol. 2018; 89 (9):1075-1090.

22. Aydinyurt HS, Tekin Y, Ertugrul AS. The effect of enamel matrix derivatives on root coverage: a 12-month follow-up of a randomized clinical trial. Braz Oral Res. 2019; 33: e006.

23. Kobayashi E, Fujioka-Kobayashi M, Saulacic N, Schaller B, Sculean A, Miron RJ. Effect of enamel matrix derivative liquid in combination with a natural bone mineral on new bone formation in a rabbit GBR model. Clin Oral Implants Res. 2019; 30 (6): 542-549.