2006, Number 1
<< Back Next >>
Rev Inst Nal Enf Resp Mex 2006; 19 (1)
A study of public perception of air pollution and its health risks:Theoretical and methodological perspectives
Catalán VM
Language: Spanish
References: 42
Page: 28-37
PDF size: 72.78 Kb.
ABSTRACT
A manual and computer search about public perception of air pollution during 1990-2005 was done, examining tendencies of debates on this field. Four areas are discussed: 1) Perception of air pollution, 2) Theoretical and methodological perspectives used in empirical studies, 3) Significant results, 4) Importance of this area of research for the development of environmental public policies in Mexico. Emphasis is made on publications since 1990, coinciding with the era of open discussions on perceptions, attitudes, opinions, knowledge and behaviour regarding air pollution.
REFERENCES
Pidgeon NF. Risk assessment, risk values and the social science programme: Why we do need risk perception research. Reliab Engineering Syst Safety 1998;59:5-15.
Elliott SJ, Cole DC, Krueger P, Voorberg N, Wakefield S. The power of perception: health risk attributed to air pollution in an urban industrial neighbourhood. Risk Anal 1999;19: 621-634.
Barker ML. Planning for environmental indices: observer appraisals of air quality. In: Craik KH, Zube GH, editors. Perceiving environmental quality. Nueva York: Plenum Press;1976. p.175-205.
Bickerstaff K, Walker GP. Public understandings of air pollution: the ‘localization’ of environmental risk. Global Environ Change 2001;11:133-145.
Bickerstaff K, Walker GP. The place (s) of matter: matter out of place-public understandings of air pollution. Progress Human Geography 2003; 27:45-67.
Bickerstaff K. Risk perception research: socio-cultural perspectives on the public experience of air pollution. Environ Int 2004;30:827-840.
Molina TL, Molina JM, editors. Air quality in the Mexico megacity: An integred assessment. Usa: Kluwer Academic Publishers;2002.
Romieu I, Korc M. Contaminación del aire exterior. En: Romieu I, Lopez S, editores. Contaminación ambiental y salud de los niños en América Latina y el Caribe. México: Instituto Nacional de Salud Pública;2002. p.109-129.
Freitas CM. De Problemas ambientais, saúde coletiva e ciências sociais. Ciênc Saúde Coletiva 2003; 8:137-150.
Catalán VM, Rojas RM, Pérez NJ. La Percepción que tiene la población adulta del Distrito Federal sobre la contaminación del aire. Estudio descriptivo. Rev Inst Nal Enf Resp Mex 2001;14: 220-223.
Ecosistema Urbano y Salud de los Habitantes de la Zona Metropolitana del Valle de México. Diciembre 16, 2004. Accesible en: http://www.sma.df. gob.mx/publicaciones/aire/escositema_urbano/ecosistema.htm
Reyes B. La percepción de la contaminación del aire en la Ciudad de México (tesis). México: Universidad Nacional Autónoma de México; 2002.
Catalán VM. Percepción de la contaminación del aire en estudiantes de nivel medio superior en instituciones públicas del Distrito Federal (tesis). México: Universidad Autónoma Metropolitana; 2003.
Álvarez R, Figueroa E, Valdés. Beneficios económicos de una reducción de la contaminación atmosférica en Santiago de Chile. Rev Invest Economica 1999;LIX: 143-169.
Skov T, Cordtz T, Jensen LK, Saugman P, Schmidt K, Theilade P. Modifications of health behaviour in response to air pollution notifications in Copenhagen. Soc Sci Med 1991;33:621-626.
Lercher P, Schmitzberger R, Kofler W. Perceived traffic air pollution, associated behaviour and health in an alpine area. Sci Total Environ 1995;169:71-74.
Forsberg B, Stjernberg N, Wall S. People can detect poor air quality well below guideline concentrations: a prevalence study of annoyance reactions and air pollution from traffic. Occup Environ Med 1997; 54:44-48.
Johnson BB. Gender and race in beliefs about outdoor air pollution. Risk Anal 2002;22:725-738.
Brody SD, Peck BM, Highfield WE. Examining localized patterns of air quality perception in Texas: a spatial and statistical analysis. Risk Anal 2004;24:1561-1574.
Howel D, Moffatt S, Prince H, Bush J, Dunn CE. Urban air quality in North-East England: exploring the influences on local views and perceptions. Risk Anal 2002;22:121-130.
Howel D, Moffatt S, Bush J, Dunn CE, Prince H. Public views on the links between air pollution and health in North-East England. Environ Res 2003; 91:163-171.
Hunter PR, Davies MA, Hill H, Whittaker M, Sufi F. The prevalence of self-reported symptoms of respiratory disease and community belief about the severity of pollution from various sources. Int J Environ Health Res 2003;13:227-238.
Williams ID, Bird A. Public perceptions of air quality and quality of life in urban and suburban areas of London. J Environ Monit 2003;5:253-259.
Hunter PR, Bickerstaff K, Davies MA. Potential sources of bias in the use of individual’s recall of the frequency of exposure to air pollution for use in exposure assessment in epidemiological studies: a cross-sectional survey. Environ Health 2004;3:3.
Cole D, Pengelly L, Eyles J, Sieb D, Hustler R. Consulting the community for environmental health indicator development: the case of air quality. Health Promot Int 1999;14:145-154.
Wakefield SE, Elliott SJ, Cole DC, Eyles JD. Environmental risk and (re)action: air quality, health, and civic involvement in an urban industrial neighbourhood (abstract). Health Place 2001;7:163-177.
Bailey P, Yearley S, Forrester J. Involving the public in local air pollution assessment: a citizen participation case study (abstract). Int J Environ Pollution 1999;11: 290-303.
Burningham K, Thrush D. Rainforest are a long way from here: the environmental concerns of disadvantaged groups. York: York Publishing; 2001.
Bush J, Moffatt S, Dunn C. ‘Even the birds round here cough’: stigma, air pollution and health in Teesside. Health Place 2001;7:47-56.
Bush J, Moffatt S, Dunn C. Keeping the public informed? Public negotiation of air quality information. Public Underst Sci 2001;10:213-229.
Beaumont R, Hamilton RS, Machin N, Perks J, Williams ID. Social awareness of air quality information. Sci Total Environ 1999;235:319-329.
Howe HL. Public concern about chemicals in the environment: regional differences based on threat potential. Public Health Rep 1990;105:186-195.
Beyragued L, Caillat-Vallet E, Guerrier-Sagnes F, et al. Health and environment in Villeurbanne. Opinions of the population (abstract). Sante Publique 1998; 10:385-399.
Flynn J, Slovic P, Mertz CK. Gender, race, and perception of environmental health risks. Risks Anal 1994;14:1101-1107.
Moffatt S, Phillimore P, Bhopal R, Foy C. ‘If this is what it’s doing to our lungs?’ Industrial pollution and public understanding in north-East England. Soc Sci Med 1995;41:883-891.
Lezama JL. El medio ambiente hoy. Temas cruciales del debate contemporáneo. Jornadas 134. El Colegio de México. Centro de Estudios Demográficos y de Desarrollo Urbano, México; 2001.
Gómez MC. Satélites y aviones de EU vigilarán el aire del DF. La Jornada 2006, febrero 24; sección Sociedad y Justicia.
Enciso LA. La tasa de muertes infantiles en México triplica las de EU y Canadá. La Jornada 2006, enero 26; sección Sociedad y Justicia.
Moffatt S, Mulloli TP, Bhopal R, Foy C, Phillimore P. An exploration of awareness bias in two environmental epidemiology studies. Epidemiology 2000; 11:1999-1208.
Smith-Sivertsen T, Tchachtchine V, Lund E. Self-reported airway symptoms in a population exposed to heavy industrial pollution: what is the role of public awareness? Epidemiology 2000;11:739-740.
Ecobarómetro de Andalucía. Enero 11, 2006. Accesible en: http:www. junta de evaluación.es/medioambiente/eco barómetro.
Slovic P. Trust, emotion, sex, politics, and science: surveying the risk-assessment battlefield. Risk Anal 1999;19:689-701.