medigraphic.com
Órgano Oficial del Hospital Angeles Health System

2019, Number S1

<< Back Next >>

Acta Med 2019; 17 (S1)

In vitro fertilization laboratory techniques: advances and applications

Carballo ME, Durán ML, Cervantes IE

Language: Spanish
References: 45
Page: 27-33
PDF size: 230.49 Kb.


ABSTRACT

Reproduction assisted techniques have had an exponential growth not only by the development of new treatments and diagnostic techniques but also equipment and culture media have adapted to this procedures and have a main part in its success. The development of the Intracytoplasmic sperm injection technique by Palermo et al (1993) made a great impact in reproductive techniques. Due to different IVF techniques, the laboratory divides in 4 main areas: Andrology, genetics, criopreservation and IVF. There are more and more advances in technology, which helps to make better diagnoses and individualized treatment.


REFERENCES

  1. Aamir J, Ashwini LS, Ganguly D, Murugan S, Muthiah SS, Shabin Kainoth, Gopinath Rami Reddy. Interpretation: real time assessment on immotile but viable spermatozoa for intracytoplasmic sperm injection (Icsi): an embryologists outlook. Austin J In vitro Fertili. 2015; 2 (3): 1021.

  2. Agarwal A, Majzoub A, Esteves SC, Ko E, Ramasamy R, Zini A. Clinical utility of sperm DNA fragmentation testing: practice recommendations based on clinical scenarios. Transl Androl Urol. 2016; 5 (6): 935-950.

  3. Al-Nusim L, Jenkins J. A brief historical review of assisted reproduction. SAJOG. 2007; 13 (2): 38-41.

  4. Alteri A, Viganò P, Maizar AA, Jovine L, Giacomini E, Rubino P. Revisiting embryo assisted hatching approaches: a systematic review of the current protocols. J Assis Reprod Gen. 2018; 35 (3): 367-391.

  5. Altma S, Esteban FJ, Stavreus-Evers A, Simon C, Giudice L, Lessey BA et al. Guidelines for the design, analysis and interpretation of ‘omics’ data: focus on human endometrium. Hum Reprod Update. 2014; 20 (1): 12-28.

  6. Ambe AK, Mondragón EC, González SE. Impact of spermatozoid head anomalies as predictor factor of non-determined infertility. Ginecol Obstet Mex. 2008; 76 (3): 151-155.

  7. Amorim CA, Shikanov A. The artificial ovary: current status and future perspectives. Future Oncol. 2016; 12 (20): 2323-2332.

  8. Armstrong S, Bhide P, Jordan V, Pacey A, Farquhar C. Time-lapse systems for embryo incubation and assessment in assisted reproduction (Review). Cochrane Database of Syst Rev. 2018; (5): CD011320.

  9. Asada Y, Tokoro M, Sonohara M, Fukunaga N, Hattori Y, Hashiba Y. Long-term outcomes of freeze-all strategy: a retrospective analysis from a single ART center in Japan. Reprod Med Biol. 2019; 18 (2): 173-179.

  10. Asch RH, Balmaceda JP, Ellsworth LR, Wong PC. Preliminary experiences with gamete intrafallopian transfer (GIFT). Fertil Steril. 1986; 45 (6): 366-371.

  11. Avalos-Durán G, Cañedo-Del Ángel AME, Rivero-Murillo J, Zambrano-Guerrero JE, Carballo-Mondragón E, Checa-Vizcaíno MA. Physiological ICSI (PICSI) vs. conventional ICSI in couples with male factor: A systematic review. JBRA Assist Reprod. 2018; 22 (2): 139-147.

  12. Jeve YB, Potdar N, Blower JA, Gelbaya T. Strategies to improve fertilisation rates with assisted conception: a systematic review. Hum Fertil (Camb). 2018; 21 (4): 229-247.

  13. Bartoov B, Berkovitz A, Eltes F. Selection of spermatozoa with normal nuclei to improve the pregnancy rate with intracytoplasmic sperm injection. N Engl J Med. 2001; 345 (14): 1067-1068.

  14. Castillo-Baso J, Garcia-Villafaña G, Santos-Haliscak R, Diaz P, Sepluveda-Gonzalez J, Hernandez-Ayup S. Embryo quality and reproductive outcomes of spermatozoa selected by physiologic-icsi or conventional icsi in patients with kruger < 4% and > 4% normo-morphology. Fertil Steril. 2011; 96: S159.

  15. Craciunas L, Gallos I, Chu J, Bourne T, Quenby S, Brosens JJ, Coomarasamy A. Conventional and modern markers of endometrial receptivity: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Hum Reprod Update. 2019; 25 (2): 202-223.

  16. Davidson LM, Liu Y, Griffiths T, Jones C, Coward K. Laser technology in the assisted reproductive technology laboratory: a narrative review. Reprod Biomed Online. 2019; 38 (5): 725-739.

  17. Desai N, Goldberg JM, Austin C, Falcone T. Are cleavage anomalies, multinucleation, or specific cell cycle kinetics observed with time-lapse imaging predictive of embryo developmental capacity or ploidy? Fertil Steril. 2018; 109 (4): 665-674.

  18. Erberelli RF, Salgado RM, Mendes Pereira DH, Wolff P. Hyaluronan-binding system for sperm selection enhances pregnancy rates in ICSI cycles associated with male factor infertility. JBRA Assist Reprod. 2017; 21 (1): 2-6.

  19. Fisch B, Abir R. Female fertility preservation: past, present and future. Reproduction. 2018; 156 (1): F11-F27.

  20. Gardner DK, Kelley RL. Impact of the IVF laboratory environment on human preimplantation embryo phenotype. J Dev Orig Health Dis. 2017; 8 (4): 418-435.

  21. Gatimel N, Parinaud J, Leandri RD. Intracytoplasmic morphologically selected sperminjection (IMSI) does not improve outcome in patients with two successive IVF-ICSI failures. J Assist Reprod Genet. 2016; 33: 349-355.

  22. Jeong J, Joo BS, Kim CW, Kim HG, Joo JK, Lee KS. Effects of three-area laser-assisted zona thinning in 8-cell human embryos on pregnancy outcomes in vitro fertilization. Clin Exp Reprod Med. 2018; 45 (1): 25-30.

  23. Kably-Ambe A, Carballo-Mondragon E, Roque-Sanchez AM, Duran Monterosas L, Amaro-Hernandez EA. Evaluation of semen parameters in long term cryopreserved samples for over 10 years. Ginecol Obstet Mex. 2016; 84 (01): 1-6.

  24. Kim S, Lee Y, Lee S, Kim T. Ovarian tissue cryopreservation and transplantation in patients with cancer. Obstet Gynecol Sci. 2018; 61 (4): 431-442.

  25. Khadem N, Poorhoseyni A, Jalali M, Akbary A, Heydari ST. Sperm DNA fragmentation in couples with unexplained recurrent spontaneous abortions. Andrologia. 2014; 46 (2): 126-130.

  26. Knudtson JF, Failor CM, Gelfond JA, Goros MW, Chang TA, Schenken RS, Robinson RD. Assisted hatching and live births in first cycle, Frozen embryo transfers. Fertil Steril. 2017; 108 (4): 628-634.

  27. Kovacs P. Embryo selection: the role of time-lapse monitoring. Reprod and Biol and Endocrinol. 2014; 12: 124.

  28. Luna D, Hilario R, Dueñas-Chacón J, Romero R, Zavala P, Villegas L, García-Ferreyra J. The IMSI procedure improves laboratory and clinical outcomes without compromising the aneuploidy rate when compared to the classical ICSI procedure. Clin Med Insights Reprod Health. 2015; 9: 29-37.

  29. Mantikou E, Youssef MFM, van Wely M, van der Veen F, Al-Inany HG, Repping S, Mastenbroek S. Embryo culture media and IVF/ICSI success rates: a systematic review. Hum Reprod Update. 2013; 19 (3): 210-220.

  30. Mio Y, Maeda K. Time-lapse cinematography of dynamic changes occurring during in vitro development of human embryos. Am J Obstet Gynecol. 2008; 199: 660.e1-660.e5.

  31. Miravet-Valencianoa JA, Rincon-Bertolina A, Vilellab F, Simon C. Understanding and improving endometrial receptivity. Curr Opin Obstet Gynecol. 2015; 27 (3): 187-192.

  32. Onofre J, Baert Y, Faes K, Goossens E. Cryopreservation of testicular tissue or testicular cell suspensions: a pivotal step in fertility preservation. Hum Reprod Update. 2016; 22 (6): 744-761.

  33. Osman E, Franasiak J, Scott R. Oocyte and embryo manipulation and epigenetics. Semin Reprod Med. 2018; 36 (3-04): e1-e9.

  34. Palermo G, Joris H, Derde MP, Camus M, Devroey P, Van Steirteghem A. Sperm characteristics and outcome of human assisted fertilization by subzonal insemination and intracytoplasmic sperm injection. Fertil Steril. 1993; 59 (4): 826-835.

  35. Payne d, Flaherty sp, Barry MF, Matthews CD. Preliminary observations on polar body extrusion and pronuclear formation in human oocytes using time-lapse video cinematography. Hum Reprod. 1997; 12 (3): 532-541.

  36. Picton HM, Wyns C, Anderson RA, Goossens E, Jahnukainen K, Kliesch S et al. On behalf of the ESHRE task force on fertility preservation in severe diseases. A european perspective on testicular tissue cryopreservation for fertility preservation in prepubertal and adolescent boys. Hum Reprod. 2015; 30 (11): 2463-2475.

  37. Pribenszky C, Nilselid AM, Montag M. Time-lapse culture with morphokinetic embryo selection improves pregnancy and live birth chances and reduces early pregnancy loss: a meta-analysis. Reprod Biomed Online. 2017; 35 (59: 511-520.

  38. Ribeiro CJ, Japur AC, de S’a Rosa-e-Silva. Cryopreservation and Fertility: Current and Prospective Possibilities for Female Cancer Patients. ISRN Obstet Gynecol. 2011; 2011: 350813.

  39. Rosenwaks Z, Pereira N. The pioneering of intracytoplasmic sperm injection: historical perspectives. Reproduction. 2017; 154 (6): F71-F77.

  40. Simopoulou M,Gkoles L, Bakas P, Giannelou P, Kalampokas T, Pantos K, Koutsilieris M. Improving ICSI: a review from the spermatozoon perspective. Syst Biol Reprod Med. 2016; 62 (6): 359-371.

  41. Suhorutshenko M, Kukushkina V, Velthut-Meikas A, Altmäe S, Peters M, Mägi R et al. Endometrial receptivity revisited: endometrial transcriptome adjusted for tissue cellular heterogeneity. Hum Reprod. 2018; 33 (11): 2074-2086.

  42. Swain JE. Decisions for the IVF laboratory: comparative analysis of embryo culture incubators. Reprod Biomed Online. 2014; 28 (5): 535-547.

  43. Tannus S, Cohen Y, Henderson S, Son WY, Tulandi T. The effect of assisted hatching on live birth rate following fresh embryo transfer in advanced maternal age. Reprod Sci. 2019; 26 (6): 806-811.

  44. Wirka AK, Chen AA, Conaghan J, Ivani K, Gvakharia M, Behr B et al. Atypical embryo phenotypes identified by time-lapse microscopy: high prevalence and association with embryo development. Fertil Steril. 2014; 14 (101): 1637-1648.

  45. Witt KD, Beresford L, Bhattacharya S, Brian K, Coomarasamy A, Hooper R et al. Hyaluronic acid binding sperm selection for assisted reproduction treatment (HABSelect): study protocol for a multicentre randomised controlled trial. BMJ Open. 2016; 6 (10): e012609.




2020     |     www.medigraphic.com