medigraphic.com
ISSN 2307-2113 (Electronic)
Revista Cubana de Información en Ciencias de la Salud (ACIMED)

2019, Number 2

<< Back Next >>

Revista Cubana de Información en Ciencias de la Salud (ACIMED) 2019; 30 (2)

Lack of s tandards in e valuating YouTube health videos

Boté JJ

Language: English
References: 51
Page: 1-20
PDF size: 574.22 Kb.


ABSTRACT

This paper is a systematised literature review of YouTube research in health with the aim of identify the different keyword search strategies, retrieval strategies and scoring systems to assess video content. A total of 176 peer reviewed papers about video content analysis and video evaluation were extracted from the PubMed database. Concerning keyword search strategy, 16 papers (9.09 %) reported that search terms were obtained from tools like Google Trends or other sources. In just one paper, a librarian was included in the research team. Manual retrieval is a common technique, and just four studies (2.27 %) reported using a different methodology. Manual retrieval also produces YouTube algorithm dependencies and consequently obtains biased results. Most other methodologies to analyse video content are based on written medical guidelines instead of video because a standard methodology is lacking. For several reasons, reliability cannot be verified. In addition, because studies cannot be repeated, the results cannot be verified and compa red. This paper reports some guidelines to improve research on YouTube, including guidelines to avoid YouTube dependencies and scoring system issues.


REFERENCES

  1. Forsyth SR, Malone RE. ‘I’ll be your cigarette--light me up and get on with it’:examining smoking imagery on YouTube. Nicotine Tob Res Off J Soc Res Nicotine Tob. 2010;12(8):810–6.

  2. Fernández-Llatas C, Traver V, Borras-Morell JE, Martínez-Millana A, Karlsen R. Arehealth videos from hospitals, health organizations, and active users available to health consumers? An Analysis of Diabetes Health Video Ranking in YouTube. Comput Math Methods Med. 2017;2017:8194-940.

  3. Burke S, Snyder S, Rager R. An assessment of faculty usage of YouTube as a teachingresource. Internet J Allied Health Sci Pract. 2009 [access: 2018/12//27]1;7(1). Available from: https://nsuworks.nova.edu/ijahsp/vol7/iss1/8

  4. 4.Sharma R, Lucas M, Ford P, Meurk C, Gartner CE. YouTube as a source of quit smokinginformation for people living with mental illness. Tob Control. 2016;25(6):634–7.

  5. Backinger CL, Pilsner AM, Augustson EM, Frydl A, Phillips T, Rowden J. YouTube as asource of quitting smoking information. Tob Control [Internet]. 2011 [access: 2018/12//27];20(2):119–22. Available from: https://tobaccocontrol.bmj.com/content/20/2/119

  6. Schmidt RS, Shi LL, Sethna A. Use of streaming media (YouTube) as an educationaltool for surgeons-a survey of AAFPRS members. JAMA Facial Plast Surg [Internet]. 2016 [access: 2018/12//27];18(3):230–1. Available from: https://jamanetwork.com/journals/jamafacialplasticsurgery/fullarticle/2498854

  7. Sampson M, Cumber J, Li C, Pound CM, Fuller A, Harrison D. A systematic review ofmethods for studying consumer health YouTube videos, with implications for systematic reviews. Peer J [Internet]. 2013 [access: 2018/12//27];1:e147. Available from: https://peerj.com/articles/147 8.Gabarron E, Fernández-Luque L, Armayones M, Lau AY. Identifying measures usedfor assessing quality of YouTube videos with patient health information: A review of current literature. Interact J Med Res. 2013;2(1):e6.

  8. Madathil KC, Rivera-Rodriguez AJ, Greenstein JS, Gramopadhye AK. Healthcareinformation on YouTube: A systematic review. Health Informatics J. 2015(3):173–94.

  9. 10 .Drozd B, Couvillon E, Suárez A. Medical YouTube videos and methods of evaluation:literature review. JMIR Med Educ. 2018;4(1):e3.

  10. Grant MJ, Booth A. A typology of reviews: an analysis of 14 review types and associatedmethodologies. Health Inf Libr J. 2009;26(2):91–108.

  11. Brahmi FA, Kaplan FTD. Embedded librarian as research team member. J Hand Surg.2017;42(3):210–2.

  12. Owens JK, Warner Stidham A, Owens EL. Disaster evacuation for persons with specialneeds: a content analysis of information on YouTube. Appl Nurs Res ANR. 2013;26(4):273–5.

  13. Sunderland N, Camm CF, Glover K, Watts A, Warwick G. A quality assessment ofrespiratory auscultation material on YouTube. Clin Med Lond Engl. 2014;14(4):391–5.

  14. Williams D, Sullivan SJ, Schneiders AG, Ahmed OH, Lee H, Balasundaram AP, et al. Bighits on the small screen: an evaluation of concussion-related videos on YouTube. Br J Sports Med. 2014;48(2):107–11.

  15. Barreto Tavares Chiavone F, de Lima Ferreira L, Tuani Candido de Oliveira SalvadorP, Filgueira Martins Rodrigues CC, Yasmin Andrade Alves K, Pereira Santos VE. Analysis of YouTube videos about urinary catheterization technique of male delay. Investig Educ En Enfermeria. 2016;34(1):171–9.

  16. Tourinho FSV, de Medeiros KS, Salvador PTCDO, Castro GLT, Santos VEP.Analysis of the YouTube videos on basic life support and cardiopulmonary resuscitation. Rev Col Bras Cir. 2012;39(4):335–9.

  17. Dubey D, Amritphale A, Sawhney A, Dubey D, Srivastav N. Analysis of YouTube asa source of information for West Nile Virus infection. Clin Med Res. 2014;12(3–4):129–32.

  18. Nasim A, Blank MD, Cobb CO, Berry BM, Kennedy MG, Eissenberg T. How to freak aBlack & Mild: a multi-study analysis of YouTube videos illustrating cigar product modification. Health Educ Res. 2014;29(1):41–57.

  19. Bueno M, Nishi ÉT, Costa T, Freire LM, Harrison D. Blood Sampling in Newborns: Asystematic review of YouTube videos. J Perinat Neonatal Nurs. 2017;31(2):160–5.

  20. Frongia G, Mehrabi A, Fonouni H, Rennert H, Golriz M, Günther P. YouTube as apotential training resource for laparoscopic fundoplication. J Surg Educ. 2016;73(6):1066–71.

  21. Syed-Abdul S, Fernández-Luque L, Jian W-S, Li Y-C, Crain S, Hsu M-H, et al.Misleading health-related information promoted through video-based social media: anorexia on YouTube. J Med Internet Res. 2013;15(2):e30.

  22. Koller U, Waldstein W, Schatz K-D, Windhager R. YouTube provides irrelevantinformation for the diagnosis and treatment of hip arthritis. Int Orthop. 2016;40(10):1995–2002.

  23. Salvador PTC de O, Costa TD da, Gomes AT de L, Assis YMS de, Santos VEP. Patientsafety: characterization of YouTube videos. Rev Gaucha Enferm. 2017;38(1):e61713.

  24. VanderKnyff J, Friedman DB, Tanner A. Framing life and death on YouTube: the strategiccommunication of organ donation messages by organ procurement organizations. J Health Commun. 2015;20(2):211–9.

  25. Steadman M, Chao MS, Strong JT, Maxwell M, West JH. C U L8ter: YouTubedistracted driving PSAs use of behavior change theory. Am J Health Behav. 2014;38(1):3–12.

  26. Brna PM, Dooley JM, Esser MJ, Perry MS, Gordon KE. Are YouTube seizure videosmisleading? Neurologists do not always agree. Epilepsy Behav [Internet]. 2013 [access: 2018/12//27];29(2):305–7. Available from: https://www.epilepsybehavior.com/article/S1525-5050(13)00408-3/abstract

  27. Athanasopoulou C, Suni S, Hätönen H, Apostolakis I, Lionis C, Välimäki M. Attitudestowards schizophrenia on YouTube: A content analysis of Finnish and Greek videos. Inform Health Soc Care. 2016;41(3):307–24.

  28. Tsai FJ, Sainbayar B. Portrayal of tobacco in Mongolian language YouTube videos: policygaps. Tob Control. 2016;25(4):480–2.

  29. Nam HK, Bang SM, Rhie YJ, Park SH, Lee K-H. Qualitative assessment of precociouspuberty-related user-created contents on YouTube. Ann Pediatr Endocrinol Metab. 2015(3):143–9.

  30. Covolo L, Ceretti E, Passeri C, Boletti M, Gelatti U. What arguments on vaccinations runthrough YouTube videos in Italy? A content analysis. Hum Vaccines Immunother. 2017;13(7):1693–9.

  31. Singh AG, Singh S, Singh PP. YouTube for information on rheumatoid arthritis-a wakeupcall? J Rheumatol. 2012;39(5):899–903.

  32. Krauss MJ, Sowles SJ, Stelzer-Monahan HE, Bierut T, Cavazos-Rehg PA. ‘It TakesLonger, but When It Hits You It Hits You!’: Videos about marijuana edibles on YouTube. subst use misuse. 2017;52(6):709–16.

  33. Ajumobi AB, Malakouti M, Bullen A, Ahaneku H, Lunsford TN. YouTubeTM as a Sourceof Instructional Videos on Bowel Preparation: a Content Analysis. J Cancer Educ Off J Am Assoc Cancer Educ. 2016;31(4):755–9.

  34. Al-Busaidi IS, Anderson TJ, Alamri Y. Qualitative analysis of Parkinson’s diseaseinformation on social media: the case of YouTubeTM. EPMA J. 2017;8(3):273–7.

  35. Fat MJL, Doja A, Barrowman N, Sell E. YouTube videos as a teaching tool and patientresource for infantile spasms. J Child Neurol. 2011;26(7):804–9.

  36. Knight K, van Leeuwen DM, Roland D, Moll HA, Oostenbrink R. YouTube: are parent-uploaded videos of their unwell children a useful source of medical information for other parents? Arch Dis Child. 2017;102(10):910–4.

  37. Camm CF, Sunderland N, Camm AJ. A quality assessment of cardiac auscultation materialon YouTube. Clin Cardiol. 2013;36(2):77–81.

  38. Azer SA, AlEshaiwi SM, AlGrain HA, AlKhelaif RA. Nervous system examination onYouTube. BMC Med Educ [Internet]. 2012 [cited: 2018/12/27];12(1):126. Available from: https://doi.org/10.1186/1472-6920-12-126

  39. Stellefson M, Chaney B, Ochipa K, Chaney D, Haider Z, Hanik B, et al. YouTube as asource of chronic obstructive pulmonary disease patient education: a social media content analysis. Chron Respir Dis. 2014;11(2):61–71.

  40. Erdem H, Sisik A. The Reliability of Bariatric Surgery Videos in YouTube Platform. ObesSurg. 2018;28(3):712–6.

  41. Pandey A, Patni N, Singh M, Sood A, Singh G. YouTube as a source of information on theH1N1 influenza pandemic. Am J Prev Med. 2010;38(3):e1-3.

  42. Singh SK, Liu S, Capasso R, Kern RC, Gouveia CJ. YouTube as a source of informationfor obstructive sleep apnea. Am J Otolaryngol. 2018;39(4):378–82.

  43. Sorensen JA, Pusz MD, Brietzke SE. YouTube as an information source for pediatricadenotonsillectomy and ear tube surgery. Int J Pediatr Otorhinolaryngol. 2014;78(1):65–70.

  44. Duncan I, Yarwood-Ross L, Haigh C. YouTube as a source of clinical skills education.Nurse Educ Today [Internet]. 2013 [access: 2018/12/27];33(12):1576–80. Available from: http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0260691712004108

  45. Basch CH, Mouser C, Clark A. Distracted driving on YouTube: implications foradolescents. Int J Adolesc Med Health. 2017 [access: 2018/12//27];31(2). Available from: https://www.researchgate.net/publication/317035002_Distracted_driving_on_YouTube_implications_for_adolescents

  46. McLean JL, Suchman EL. Video Lecture Capture Technology Helps Students Studywithout Affecting Attendance in Large Microbiology Lecture Courses. J Microbiol Biol Educ [Internet]. 2016 [access: 2018/10/2];17(3). Available from: https://www.researchgate.net/publication/317035002_Distracted_driving_on_YouTube_implications_for_adolescents

  47. Borusiak P, Langer T, Tibussek D, Becher T, Jenke AC, Cagnoli S, et al. YouTube as asource of information for children with paroxysmal episodes. Klin Padiatr. 2013;225(7):394–7.

  48. Gupta HV, Lee RW, Raina SK, Behrle BL, Hinduja A, Mittal MK. Analysis of youtubeas a source of information for peripheral neuropathy. Muscle Nerve. 2016;53(1):27–31.

  49. Tanwar R, Khattar N, Sood R, Makkar A. Benign prostatic hyperplasia related content onYouTube: unregulated and concerning. Recenti Prog Med. 2015;106(7):337–41.

  50. Shah C. ContextMiner: Supporting the Mining of Contextual Information for EphemeralDigital Video Preservation | International Journal of Digital Curation. 2009 [access: 2018/12/17];4(2):171–83. Available from: http://www.ijdc.net/article/view/127

  51. Khairutdinov RR, Nalimova IS, Sosnovskaya GI. Information competence development onthe basis of professional-oriented video materials. Eur Res Stud J. 2017;20:136–44.




2020     |     www.medigraphic.com