medigraphic.com
ISSN 2307-2113 (Digital)
Revista Cubana de Información en Ciencias de la Salud (ACIMED)

2019, Número 2

<< Anterior Siguiente >>

Revista Cubana de Información en Ciencias de la Salud (ACIMED) 2019; 30 (2)


Carencia de normas en la evaluación de videos de salud de YouTube

Boté JJ

Idioma: Ingles.
Referencias bibliográficas: 51
Paginas: 1-20
Archivo PDF: 574.22 Kb.


RESUMEN

El estudio es una revisión bibliográfica sistematizada de investigaciones de YouTube sobre salud, realizado con el objetivo de identificar las diferentes estrategias de búsqueda de palabras clave, estrategias de recuperación y sistemas de puntuación utilizados en la evaluación de los contenidos de los videos. Se extrajo un total de 176 artículos arbitrados sobre análisis de contenidos de videos y evaluación de videos publicados en la base de datos PubMed. En cuanto a la estrategia de búsqueda de palabras clave, 16 artículos (9,09 %) refieren que los términos de búsqueda se obtuvieron en herramientas como Google Trends y otras fuentes. Un solo artículo incluye un bibliotecario en el equipo de investigación. La recuperación manual es una técnica frecuente, y solo cuatro estudios (2,27 %) refieren haber utilizado otra metodología. La recuperación manual también crea dependencias de los algoritmos de YouTube con la consecuente obtención de resultados sesgados. La mayoría de las otras metodologías de análisis de contenidos de videos se basan en guías médicas impresas y no en videos, por la carencia de una metodología estándar. Por diversas razones, la confiabilidad no se puede verificar. Además, teniendo en cuenta que los estudios no pueden repetirse, los resultados no se pueden verificar ni comparar. El presente artículo ofrece algunas directrices para mejorar las búsquedas en YouTube, entre las que se incluyen directrices para evitar la dependencia de YouTube y temas relacionados con los sistemas de puntuación.


REFERENCIAS (EN ESTE ARTÍCULO)

  1. Forsyth SR, Malone RE. ‘I’ll be your cigarette--light me up and get on with it’:examining smoking imagery on YouTube. Nicotine Tob Res Off J Soc Res Nicotine Tob. 2010;12(8):810–6.

  2. Fernández-Llatas C, Traver V, Borras-Morell JE, Martínez-Millana A, Karlsen R. Arehealth videos from hospitals, health organizations, and active users available to health consumers? An Analysis of Diabetes Health Video Ranking in YouTube. Comput Math Methods Med. 2017;2017:8194-940.

  3. Burke S, Snyder S, Rager R. An assessment of faculty usage of YouTube as a teachingresource. Internet J Allied Health Sci Pract. 2009 [access: 2018/12//27]1;7(1). Available from: https://nsuworks.nova.edu/ijahsp/vol7/iss1/8

  4. 4.Sharma R, Lucas M, Ford P, Meurk C, Gartner CE. YouTube as a source of quit smokinginformation for people living with mental illness. Tob Control. 2016;25(6):634–7.

  5. Backinger CL, Pilsner AM, Augustson EM, Frydl A, Phillips T, Rowden J. YouTube as asource of quitting smoking information. Tob Control [Internet]. 2011 [access: 2018/12//27];20(2):119–22. Available from: https://tobaccocontrol.bmj.com/content/20/2/119

  6. Schmidt RS, Shi LL, Sethna A. Use of streaming media (YouTube) as an educationaltool for surgeons-a survey of AAFPRS members. JAMA Facial Plast Surg [Internet]. 2016 [access: 2018/12//27];18(3):230–1. Available from: https://jamanetwork.com/journals/jamafacialplasticsurgery/fullarticle/2498854

  7. Sampson M, Cumber J, Li C, Pound CM, Fuller A, Harrison D. A systematic review ofmethods for studying consumer health YouTube videos, with implications for systematic reviews. Peer J [Internet]. 2013 [access: 2018/12//27];1:e147. Available from: https://peerj.com/articles/147 8.Gabarron E, Fernández-Luque L, Armayones M, Lau AY. Identifying measures usedfor assessing quality of YouTube videos with patient health information: A review of current literature. Interact J Med Res. 2013;2(1):e6.

  8. Madathil KC, Rivera-Rodriguez AJ, Greenstein JS, Gramopadhye AK. Healthcareinformation on YouTube: A systematic review. Health Informatics J. 2015(3):173–94.

  9. 10 .Drozd B, Couvillon E, Suárez A. Medical YouTube videos and methods of evaluation:literature review. JMIR Med Educ. 2018;4(1):e3.

  10. Grant MJ, Booth A. A typology of reviews: an analysis of 14 review types and associatedmethodologies. Health Inf Libr J. 2009;26(2):91–108.

  11. Brahmi FA, Kaplan FTD. Embedded librarian as research team member. J Hand Surg.2017;42(3):210–2.

  12. Owens JK, Warner Stidham A, Owens EL. Disaster evacuation for persons with specialneeds: a content analysis of information on YouTube. Appl Nurs Res ANR. 2013;26(4):273–5.

  13. Sunderland N, Camm CF, Glover K, Watts A, Warwick G. A quality assessment ofrespiratory auscultation material on YouTube. Clin Med Lond Engl. 2014;14(4):391–5.

  14. Williams D, Sullivan SJ, Schneiders AG, Ahmed OH, Lee H, Balasundaram AP, et al. Bighits on the small screen: an evaluation of concussion-related videos on YouTube. Br J Sports Med. 2014;48(2):107–11.

  15. Barreto Tavares Chiavone F, de Lima Ferreira L, Tuani Candido de Oliveira SalvadorP, Filgueira Martins Rodrigues CC, Yasmin Andrade Alves K, Pereira Santos VE. Analysis of YouTube videos about urinary catheterization technique of male delay. Investig Educ En Enfermeria. 2016;34(1):171–9.

  16. Tourinho FSV, de Medeiros KS, Salvador PTCDO, Castro GLT, Santos VEP.Analysis of the YouTube videos on basic life support and cardiopulmonary resuscitation. Rev Col Bras Cir. 2012;39(4):335–9.

  17. Dubey D, Amritphale A, Sawhney A, Dubey D, Srivastav N. Analysis of YouTube asa source of information for West Nile Virus infection. Clin Med Res. 2014;12(3–4):129–32.

  18. Nasim A, Blank MD, Cobb CO, Berry BM, Kennedy MG, Eissenberg T. How to freak aBlack & Mild: a multi-study analysis of YouTube videos illustrating cigar product modification. Health Educ Res. 2014;29(1):41–57.

  19. Bueno M, Nishi ÉT, Costa T, Freire LM, Harrison D. Blood Sampling in Newborns: Asystematic review of YouTube videos. J Perinat Neonatal Nurs. 2017;31(2):160–5.

  20. Frongia G, Mehrabi A, Fonouni H, Rennert H, Golriz M, Günther P. YouTube as apotential training resource for laparoscopic fundoplication. J Surg Educ. 2016;73(6):1066–71.

  21. Syed-Abdul S, Fernández-Luque L, Jian W-S, Li Y-C, Crain S, Hsu M-H, et al.Misleading health-related information promoted through video-based social media: anorexia on YouTube. J Med Internet Res. 2013;15(2):e30.

  22. Koller U, Waldstein W, Schatz K-D, Windhager R. YouTube provides irrelevantinformation for the diagnosis and treatment of hip arthritis. Int Orthop. 2016;40(10):1995–2002.

  23. Salvador PTC de O, Costa TD da, Gomes AT de L, Assis YMS de, Santos VEP. Patientsafety: characterization of YouTube videos. Rev Gaucha Enferm. 2017;38(1):e61713.

  24. VanderKnyff J, Friedman DB, Tanner A. Framing life and death on YouTube: the strategiccommunication of organ donation messages by organ procurement organizations. J Health Commun. 2015;20(2):211–9.

  25. Steadman M, Chao MS, Strong JT, Maxwell M, West JH. C U L8ter: YouTubedistracted driving PSAs use of behavior change theory. Am J Health Behav. 2014;38(1):3–12.

  26. Brna PM, Dooley JM, Esser MJ, Perry MS, Gordon KE. Are YouTube seizure videosmisleading? Neurologists do not always agree. Epilepsy Behav [Internet]. 2013 [access: 2018/12//27];29(2):305–7. Available from: https://www.epilepsybehavior.com/article/S1525-5050(13)00408-3/abstract

  27. Athanasopoulou C, Suni S, Hätönen H, Apostolakis I, Lionis C, Välimäki M. Attitudestowards schizophrenia on YouTube: A content analysis of Finnish and Greek videos. Inform Health Soc Care. 2016;41(3):307–24.

  28. Tsai FJ, Sainbayar B. Portrayal of tobacco in Mongolian language YouTube videos: policygaps. Tob Control. 2016;25(4):480–2.

  29. Nam HK, Bang SM, Rhie YJ, Park SH, Lee K-H. Qualitative assessment of precociouspuberty-related user-created contents on YouTube. Ann Pediatr Endocrinol Metab. 2015(3):143–9.

  30. Covolo L, Ceretti E, Passeri C, Boletti M, Gelatti U. What arguments on vaccinations runthrough YouTube videos in Italy? A content analysis. Hum Vaccines Immunother. 2017;13(7):1693–9.

  31. Singh AG, Singh S, Singh PP. YouTube for information on rheumatoid arthritis-a wakeupcall? J Rheumatol. 2012;39(5):899–903.

  32. Krauss MJ, Sowles SJ, Stelzer-Monahan HE, Bierut T, Cavazos-Rehg PA. ‘It TakesLonger, but When It Hits You It Hits You!’: Videos about marijuana edibles on YouTube. subst use misuse. 2017;52(6):709–16.

  33. Ajumobi AB, Malakouti M, Bullen A, Ahaneku H, Lunsford TN. YouTubeTM as a Sourceof Instructional Videos on Bowel Preparation: a Content Analysis. J Cancer Educ Off J Am Assoc Cancer Educ. 2016;31(4):755–9.

  34. Al-Busaidi IS, Anderson TJ, Alamri Y. Qualitative analysis of Parkinson’s diseaseinformation on social media: the case of YouTubeTM. EPMA J. 2017;8(3):273–7.

  35. Fat MJL, Doja A, Barrowman N, Sell E. YouTube videos as a teaching tool and patientresource for infantile spasms. J Child Neurol. 2011;26(7):804–9.

  36. Knight K, van Leeuwen DM, Roland D, Moll HA, Oostenbrink R. YouTube: are parent-uploaded videos of their unwell children a useful source of medical information for other parents? Arch Dis Child. 2017;102(10):910–4.

  37. Camm CF, Sunderland N, Camm AJ. A quality assessment of cardiac auscultation materialon YouTube. Clin Cardiol. 2013;36(2):77–81.

  38. Azer SA, AlEshaiwi SM, AlGrain HA, AlKhelaif RA. Nervous system examination onYouTube. BMC Med Educ [Internet]. 2012 [cited: 2018/12/27];12(1):126. Available from: https://doi.org/10.1186/1472-6920-12-126

  39. Stellefson M, Chaney B, Ochipa K, Chaney D, Haider Z, Hanik B, et al. YouTube as asource of chronic obstructive pulmonary disease patient education: a social media content analysis. Chron Respir Dis. 2014;11(2):61–71.

  40. Erdem H, Sisik A. The Reliability of Bariatric Surgery Videos in YouTube Platform. ObesSurg. 2018;28(3):712–6.

  41. Pandey A, Patni N, Singh M, Sood A, Singh G. YouTube as a source of information on theH1N1 influenza pandemic. Am J Prev Med. 2010;38(3):e1-3.

  42. Singh SK, Liu S, Capasso R, Kern RC, Gouveia CJ. YouTube as a source of informationfor obstructive sleep apnea. Am J Otolaryngol. 2018;39(4):378–82.

  43. Sorensen JA, Pusz MD, Brietzke SE. YouTube as an information source for pediatricadenotonsillectomy and ear tube surgery. Int J Pediatr Otorhinolaryngol. 2014;78(1):65–70.

  44. Duncan I, Yarwood-Ross L, Haigh C. YouTube as a source of clinical skills education.Nurse Educ Today [Internet]. 2013 [access: 2018/12/27];33(12):1576–80. Available from: http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0260691712004108

  45. Basch CH, Mouser C, Clark A. Distracted driving on YouTube: implications foradolescents. Int J Adolesc Med Health. 2017 [access: 2018/12//27];31(2). Available from: https://www.researchgate.net/publication/317035002_Distracted_driving_on_YouTube_implications_for_adolescents

  46. McLean JL, Suchman EL. Video Lecture Capture Technology Helps Students Studywithout Affecting Attendance in Large Microbiology Lecture Courses. J Microbiol Biol Educ [Internet]. 2016 [access: 2018/10/2];17(3). Available from: https://www.researchgate.net/publication/317035002_Distracted_driving_on_YouTube_implications_for_adolescents

  47. Borusiak P, Langer T, Tibussek D, Becher T, Jenke AC, Cagnoli S, et al. YouTube as asource of information for children with paroxysmal episodes. Klin Padiatr. 2013;225(7):394–7.

  48. Gupta HV, Lee RW, Raina SK, Behrle BL, Hinduja A, Mittal MK. Analysis of youtubeas a source of information for peripheral neuropathy. Muscle Nerve. 2016;53(1):27–31.

  49. Tanwar R, Khattar N, Sood R, Makkar A. Benign prostatic hyperplasia related content onYouTube: unregulated and concerning. Recenti Prog Med. 2015;106(7):337–41.

  50. Shah C. ContextMiner: Supporting the Mining of Contextual Information for EphemeralDigital Video Preservation | International Journal of Digital Curation. 2009 [access: 2018/12/17];4(2):171–83. Available from: http://www.ijdc.net/article/view/127

  51. Khairutdinov RR, Nalimova IS, Sosnovskaya GI. Information competence development onthe basis of professional-oriented video materials. Eur Res Stud J. 2017;20:136–44.




2020     |     www.medigraphic.com