2018, Number 3
<< Back Next >>
Revista Cubana de Cirugía 2018; 57 (3)
Risk factors under lengthened surgical time in laparoscopic hysterectomy
Fernández GA, Ramos PA, Rosales AY, López AY, Pujol LP
Language: Spanish
References: 31
Page: 1-10
PDF size: 142.87 Kb.
ABSTRACT
Introduction: Hysterectomies are one of the surgical procedures most performed
worldwide. Among the advantages of laparoscopic hysterectomy, we can mention less
intraoperative bleeding, shorter hospital stay, faster recovery, and decreased infection
rate in the surgical site. However, all this is achieved at the expense of a longer surgical
time, higher cost, and increase in ureteral and bladder injuries.
Objective: To identify the risk factors that influence the lengthening of surgical time in
patients undergoing a laparoscopic hysterectomy.
Method: An analytical, observational case-control study. We evaluated the patients
performed video-assisted laparoscopic hysterectomy from January 2012 to December
2016 at Carlos Manuel de Céspedes University Hospital in Bayamo, Granma (Cuba).
These patients made up the study population. The sample consisted of the cases, made
up by all patients with lengthened surgical time (130 minutes or more), and the controls,
those patients with surgical time less than 130 minutes. A probabilistic sampling was
carried out with approximate matching for each variable.
Results: In the univariate analysis, the risk factors were the delay for this type of
intervention, the antecedents of previous caesarean sections (p=0.001), uterus weighing
more than 320 grams (p=0.001), mobility to vaginal touch (p=0.013), difficulty in
uterine descent to vaginal touch (p=0.003), and the execution of another intervention
during hysterectomy (p=0.003). In the multivariate analysis, we identified the uterus
weighing more than 320 g (p=0.012), performing another procedure during the
procedure (p=0.021), and previous caesarean section (p=0.043) as the main risk factors.
Conclusions: The factors that influenced the lengthening of the hysterectomy most
were antecedents of cesarean section, uterus with an estimated weight greater than
320 g, and the execution of other interventions during the same procedure.
REFERENCES
Wu JM, Wechter ME, Geller EJ, Nguyen TV, Visco AG. Hysterectomy rates in the United States, 2003. Obstetrics and Ginecology. 2007;110(5):1091-5.
Murillo Ibarrola JM, Pedraza González LA, Aguirre Osete X, López González PE. Histerectomía por laparoscopia: experiencia de 10 años en el Hospital Español de México. Ginecol Obstet Mex. 2007;75(11):667-77.
Ayala Yáñez R, Briones Landa C, Anaya Coeto H, Leroy López L, Zavaleta Salazar R. Histerectomía total laparoscópica: estudio descriptivo de la experiencia institucional con 198 casos. Ginecol Obstet Mex. 2010;78(11):605-11.
Reich H, DeCaprio J, McGlynn F. Laparoscopic hysterectomy. J Gynecol Surg. 1989;5:213-6.
Whiteman MK, Hillis SD, Jamieson DJ, Morrow B, Podgornik MN, Brett KM, et al. Inpatient hysterectomy surveillance in the United States, 2000-2004. Am J Obstet Gynecol. 2008;198(1):34-7.
Ministerio de Salud Pública, Dirección Nacional de Registros Médicos y Estadísticas de Salud. Anuario Estadístico de Salud 2011. Edición Especial. La Habana: MINSAP; 2012, Abr. 40 p.
Pandit MJ, Alsop R. Using international data to set benchmarks for morbidity outcomes after hysterectomy. Int J Gynaecol Obstet. 2016;133(1):84-8.
Johnson N, Barlow D, Lethaby A, Tavender E, Curr L, Garry R. Methods of hysterectomy: systematic review and meta-analysis of randomised controlled trials. BMJ. 2005;330:1478.
Mäkinen J, Johansson J, Tomás C, Tomás E, Heinonen PK, Laatikainen T, et al. Morbidity of 10 110 hysterectomies by type of approach. Hum Reprod. 2001;16(7):1473-8.
Shepherd JA, Hudgens JL, Yussman MA, Biscette SM, Pasic R. Stepwise approach to laparoscopic hysterectomy: evaluation of technique and cost benefit. Surg Technol Int. 2013;23:166-75.
Morgan Ortiz F, López Zepeda MA, Elorriaga García E, Soto Pineda JM, Lelevier Rico HB. Histerectomía total laparoscópica: complicaciones y evolución clínica en una serie de 87 casos. Ginecol Obstet Mex. 2008;76(9):520-5.
Müller A, Thiel FC, Renner SP, Winkler M, Häberle L, Beckmann MW. Hysterectomy—A Comparison of Approaches. Dtsch Arztebl Int. 2010;107(20):353-9.
Song T, Kim TJ, Kang H, Lee YY, Choi CH, Lee JW, et al. Factors associated with complications and conversion to laparotomy in women undergoing laparoscopically assisted vaginal hysterectomy. Acta Obstet Gynecol Scand. 2012;91(5):620-4.
Lafay Pillet MC, Leonard F, Chopin N, Malaret JM, Borghese B, Foulot H, et al. Incidence and risk factors of bladder injuries during laparoscopic hysterectomy indicated for benign uterine pathologies: a 14.5 years experience in a continuous series of 1501 procedures. Hum Reprod. 2009;24(4):842-49.
Nieboer TE, Spaanderman MEA, Bongers MY, Vierhout ME, Kluivers KB. Gynaecologists estimate and experience laparoscopic hysterectomy as more difficult compared with abdominal hysterectomy. Gynecol Surg. 2010;7:359–63.
Garry R, Fountain J, Mason S, Napp V, Brown J, Hawe J, et al. The eVALuate study: two parallel randomised trials, one comparing laparoscopic with abdominal hysterectomy, the other comparing laparoscopic with vaginal hysterectomy. BMJ. 2004;328(7432):129-32.
Jones HJS, de Cossart L. Risk scoring in surgical patients. Br J Surg. 1999;86:149- 57.
Shushan A, Mohamed H, Magos AL. How long does laparosocopic surgery really take? Lessons learned from 1000 operative laparoscopies. Human Reprod. 1999;14(1):39-43.
Shushan A, Mohamed H, Magos AL. A case-control study to compare the variability of operating time in laparoscopic and open surgery. Human Reprod. 1999;14(6):1467-69.
Catanzarite T, Saha S, Pilecki MA. Longer operative time during benign laparoscopic and robotic hysterectomy is associated with increased 30-day perioperative complications. J Minim Invasive Gynecol. 2015;22:1049–58.
Catanzarite T, Vieira B, Qin C, Milad MP. Risk Factors for Unscheduled 30-day Readmission after Benign Hysterectomy. South Med J. 2015;108(9):524-30.
Driessen SR, Sandberg EM, la Chapelle CF, Twijnstra AR, Rhemrev JP, Jansen FW. Case-Mix Variables and Predictors for Outcomes of Laparoscopic Hysterectomy: A Systematic Review. J Minim Invasive Gynecol. 2016;23(3):317-30.
Bettaiah R, Reddy CA. Laparoscopic Hysterectomies: Our 10 Years Experience in a Single Laparoscopic Center. J Obstet Gynaecol India. 2016;66(4):274-81.
Smorgick N, DeLancey J, Patzkowsky K, Advincula A, Song A, As-Sanie S. Risk factors for postoperative urinary retention after laparoscopic and robotic hysterectomy for benign indications. Obstet Gynecol. 2012;120(3):581-6.
Polat M, Kahramanoglu I, Senol T, Senturk B, Ozkaya E, Karateke A. Comparison of the Effect of Laparoscopic and Abdominal Hysterectomy on Lower Urinary Tract Function, Vaginal Length, and Dyspareunia: A Randomized Clinical Trial. J Laparoendosc Adv Surg Tech A. 2016;26(2):116-21.
Macciò A, Chiappe G, Kotsonis P, Nieddu R, Lavra F, Serra M, et al. Surgical outcome and complications of total laparoscopic hysterectomy for very large myomatous uteri in relation to uterine weight: a prospective study in a continuous series of 461 procedures. Arch Gynecol Obstet. 2016;13(4):234-9.
Yavuzcan A, Cağlar M, Ustün Y, Dilbaz S, Kumru S. Evaluation of the outcomes of laparoscopic hysterectomy for normal and enlarged uterus (>280 g). Arch Gynecol Obstet. 2014;289(4):831-7.
Lee MS, Venkatesh KK, Growdon WB, Ecker JL, York-Best CM. Predictors of 30- day readmission following hysterectomy for benign and malignant indications at a tertiary care academic medical center. Am J Obstet Gynecol. 2016;214(5):607-12.
Jones K, Harmanli O, Robinson CA, Esin S, Citil A, Knee A. Effect of concomitant oophorectomy on the perioperative outcomes of laparoscopic hysterectomy. Int J Gynaecol Obstet. 2012;117(1):84-5.
Novetsky AP, Boyd LR, Curtin JP. Trends in bilateral oophorectomy at the time of hysterectomy for benign disease. Obstet Gynecol. 2011;118(6):1280-6.
Deffieux X, Rochambeau B, Chene G, Gauthier T, Huet S, Lamblin G, et al. Hysterectomy for benign disease: clinical practice guidelines from the French College of Obstetrics and Gynecology. Eur J Obstet Gynecol Reprod Biol. 2016;202:83-91.