medigraphic.com
Órgano Oficial de el Colegio Mexicano de Urología

2006, Number 2

<< Back Next >>

Bol Col Mex Urol 2006; 21 (2)

Cancer of prostate diagnosed by biopsy transrectal guided by ultrasound. Experience in 2 years at Specialties Hospital “Dr. Antonio Fraga Mouret” Centro Médico Nacional “La Raza”, IMSS

Lechuga BA, Arenas OJ, Vega SR

Language: Spanish
References: 22
Page: 38-43
PDF size: 60.75 Kb.


ABSTRACT

Objective: To determine the frequency of cancer of prostate detected by biopsy transrectal guided by ultrasound. Material and methods: Design: Retrospective, transverse, descriptive, observational, opened of January 01, 2003 - on December 31, 2004 in Urology Department of the HECMR the clinical file was checked, the patients’ expenditures were registered by Diagnosis of Cancer of prostate to whom they the biopsy guided by ultrasound was included in his protocol of study. Of the clinical process I analyze the age, clinical diagnosis, report of histopathologic definitively, report of prostate antigen in ng/mL, finds ultrasonography and etapifica ultrasonition in agreement with TNM and Gleason, as well as the morbidity. Analysis of information: t Student, descriptive statistics. Results: 195 biopsies were realized transrectal guided by ultrasound for diagnosis of Cancer of prostate. In that I capture a frequency of cancer in biopsy transrectal of 51% (100 cases), frequent Gleason, moderate differentiated 5-7 (45 cases) and frequent TNM T2 (40 cases). Conclusions: The biopsy transrectal guided by ultrasound is an ideal method to realize early diagnosis in patients with biochemical suspicion of cancer of prostate (prostate antigen of 4-10 ng/mL) and hereby to affect in a direct way in the type of treatment that the patient will receive.


REFERENCES

  1. Schulman CC, Anderson B J, Bangma HC, Marberger JM. Prevention and Screening. Eur Urol 2002; (Suppl 1): 3-9.

  2. Atlas of Cancer Mortality in The United States, 1950-1994 Ed: National Institutes of Health and National Cancer Institute. Philadelphia: W.B. Saunders, 1999: 36-40.

  3. Watanabe H. History and applications of transrectal sonography of the prostate. Urol Clin North Am 1989; 16: 617-22.

  4. Wals CP. editor Ultrasonography and Biopsy of prostate: Campbell’s Urology. 8th ed. Philadelphia: W.B. Saunders, 2002: 3038-44.

  5. Anderson CP, Fein NR. United States Census Bureau data. Ed. Interamericana. 2000: 34-8.

  6. Herranz AF. Atlas de ecografía transrectal de próstata. Instituto de Salud Barcelona. España. 2000: 1-134.

  7. Montie EJ, Meyers S. Defining the ideal tumor marker for prostate cancer. Urol Clin North Am 1997; 2: 247-52.

  8. Vessella RL, Lange P. Prostate specific antigen. Urol Clin North Am 1997; 2: 269-73.

  9. Olsson CA, Benson MC. The use of prostate specific antigen in the diagnosis of localized prostate cancer. Urol Clin North Am 1996; 23: 531-40.

  10. Hernandez A, Smith J. Transrectal ultrasonography for detection and staging of prostate cancer. Urol Clin North Am 1990; 17: 745-57.

  11. Morse RM, Resnick MI. Detection clinically occult prostate cancer. Urol Clin North Am 1990; 17: 567-574.

  12. Wheeler MT. Anatomic considerations in carcinoma the prostate. Urol Clin North Am 1989; 16: 623-34.

  13. Scardino P. Early detection of prostate cancer. Urol Clin North Am 1989; 16: 635-55.

  14. Chodak GW. Screening for prostate role of ultrasonography. Urol Clin North Am 1989; 16: 657-61.

  15. Lee F, Pedersen ST, Richard D. Diagnosis of prostate cancer by transrectal ultrasound. Urol Clin North Am 1989; 16: 663-73.

  16. Shinohara K, Scardino PT, Carter S. Pathologic basis of the sonography appearance of the normal and malignant prostate. Urol Clin North Am 1989; 16: 675-91.

  17. Muldoon L, Resnick. Results of ultrasonography of the prostate. Urol Clin North Am 1989; 16: 693-702.

  18. Lee F, Pedersen ST. Transrectal biopsy of the prostate guided by transrectal ultrasound. Urol Clin North Am 1989; 16: 703-712.

  19. Shinohara K, Scardino PT, Carter S, Wheeler MT. Staging of the prostate cancer value of ultrasonography. Urol Clin North Am 1989; 16: 713-34.

  20. Anderson SJ, Walsh CP. Prostate biopsy: An update. J Urol 2002; (Suppl. 1): 37-44.

  21. Barboroglu PG, Robert J. Repeat biopsy strategy in patient with atypical acinar proliferation or high grade prostatic intraepithelial neoplasia on initial prostatic needle biopsy. J Urol 2005; (Suppl. 3): 66-70.

  22. Rodriguez LV, Terri MK. Risk and complications of transrectal ultrasound guided prostate needle biopsy. J Urol 2005; (Suppl. 6): 2115-20.




2020     |     www.medigraphic.com