medigraphic.com
ISSN 2395-9215 (Print)
Órgano Oficial de Difusión de la Facultad de Odontología de la UNAM

2018, Number 3

<< Back Next >>

Rev Mex Ortodon 2018; 6 (3)

Maxillary protraction supported on surgery fixation miniplates in patients with cleft lip and palate sequels. Report of six cases

Ayuso-Arce A, Pong-Tejeda C, González-González R, Vite-Silva A, Vargas-Rosales M

Language: Spanish
References: 17
Page: 157-161
PDF size: 338.76 Kb.


ABSTRACT

Report of six cases of maxillary protraction supported with miniplates surgical fixation in patients with diagnosis sequel of unilateral and bilateral LPH, with an average age of 13.4 years, and divided into four unilateral and two bilateral cases. The use of intermaxillary elastics without extraoral support is a advantage over the protraction mask, by the constancy of the forces, and hours of use that are increased by the comfort of the patient; the bone structures are stimulated effectively minimizing dentoalveolar compensation getting overtaking of maxillary point A, 6 mm on average, with modification of the facial center improving the skeletal and dental relationship as well as the self-esteem of patients. The sixth bilateral patient was discarded because osseointegration of the osteosynthesis material was not achieved, conditioning the loosening of the plates, which did not allow the protraction, there were no complications with the material osteosynthesis. Study carried out at the facilities of UNITEC.


REFERENCES

  1. Proffit WR. Contemporary orthodontics. 4th ed. St. Louis: Mosby; 2006. p. 50.

  2. Litton SF, Ackermann LV, Isaacson RJ, Shapiro BL. A genetic study of class III malocclusion. Am J Orthod. 1970; 58 (6): 565-577.

  3. Westwood PV, McNamara JA Jr, Baccetti T, Franchi L, Sarver DM. Long-term effects of class III treatment with rapid maxillary expansion and facemask therapy followed by fixed appliances. Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop. 2003; 123 (3): 306-320.

  4. Liao YF, Mars M. Long-term effects of lip repair on dentofacial morphology in patients with unilateral cleft lip and palate. Cleft Palate Craniofac J. 2005; 42 (5): 526-532.

  5. Wells AP, Sarver DM, Profitt WR. Long term efficacy of reverse pull head year therapy. Angle Orthod. 2006; 76: 915-922.

  6. Hwang CJ, Kyong SH, Lim JK. The effect of maxillary protraction appliance treatment in skeletal class III malocclusion patients. Korea J Orthod. 1994; 24: 851-860.

  7. Merwin D, Ngan P, Hagg U, Yiu C, Wei SH. Timing for effective application of anteriorly directed orthopedic force to the maxilla. Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop. 1997; 112 (3): 292-299.

  8. De Clerck HJ, Cornelis MA, Cevidanes LH, Heymann GC, Tulloch CJ. Orthopedic traction of the maxilla with miniplates: a new perspective for treatment of midface deficiency. J Oral Maxillofac Surg. 2009; 67: 2123-2129.

  9. Cevidanes L, Baccetti T, Franchi L, McNamara JA Jr, DeClerck H. Comparison of two protocols for maxillary protraction: bone anchors versus face mask with rapid maxillary expansion. Angle Orthod. 2010; 80: 799-806.

  10. Heymann GC, Cevidanes L, Cornelis M, De Clerck HJ, Tulloch JF. Three-dimensional analysis of maxillary protraction with intermaxillary elastics to miniplates. Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop. 2010; 137: 274-284.

  11. De Clerck. Success rate of miniplate anchorage for bone anchored maxillary protraction. Angle Orthod. 2011; 81: 1010-1013.

  12. Liou EJ, Tsai WC. A new protocol for maxillary protraction in cleft patients: repetitive weekly protocol of alternate rapid maxillary expansions and constrictions. Cleft Palate Craniofac J. 2005; 42 (2): 121-127.

  13. Liu SS, Kyung HM, Buschang PH. Continuos forces are more effective than intermittent forces in expanding sutures. Eur J Othod. 2010; 32: 371-380.

  14. Molina F, Ortiz-Monasterio F, De la Paz-Aguilar M, Barrera J. Maxillary distraction: aesthetic and functional benefits in cleft lip-palate and prognathic patients during mixed dentition. Plast Reonstr Surg. 1998; 101: 951-963.

  15. Polley JW, Figueroa AA. Management of severe maxillary deficiency in childhood and adolescence through distraction osteogenesis with and external adjustable rigid distraction device. J Craniofac Surg. 1997; 8: 181-185.

  16. Cha BK, Ngan PW. Skeletal anchorage for orthopedic correction of growing class III patients. Semin Orthod. 2011; 17 (2): 124-137.

  17. Cha BK, Choi DS. Easy orthodontic treatment of growing children: orthopedic treatments of class III malocclusion using skeletal anchorage. Kor J Dent Clin Orthod. 206; 5: 58-65.




2020     |     www.medigraphic.com