medigraphic.com
ISSN 2007-4360 (Print)
Asociación Mexicana de Periodontología, Colegio de Periodoncistas A.C

2018, Number 3

<< Back Next >>

Rev Mex Periodontol 2018; 9 (3)

Flange augmentation and implant placement in a case of resection of a central lesion of giant cells

Ibáñez RO, Hernández VI

Language: Spanish
References: 16
Page: 55-61
PDF size: 447.42 Kb.


ABSTRACT

The central giant cell lesion is considered historically a reactive lesion rather than a true neoplasm. 65% of cases are found in the mandible, divergence of tooth roots may also be seen, some cases has been report pain and paresthesia. Male patient 22 years of age diagnosed at 11 with central giant cell lesion, which was treated through surgical resection and extraction of deciduous and permanent teeth 3.3 and 3.4, and placement of xenograft. A follow-up was carried out for the following 11 years; after this time was diagnosed with a Seibert class III treated by means ridge augmentation with hard and soft tissue augmentation to allow implant-supported prosthetics.


REFERENCES

  1. El-Naggar A, Chan J, Grandis J, Takata T, Slootweg P. WHO classification of head and neck tumours. 4th ed. Lyon: International Agency for Research on Cancer (IARC); 2017.

  2. Fowler C. Benign and malignant neoplasms of the periodontium. Periodontology 2000. 1999; 21 (1): 33-83.

  3. Neville B, Damm D, Allen CM, Bouquo JE. Oral and maxillofacial pathology. Philadelphia: Saunders; 2002.

  4. Rakhmatia Y, Ayukawa Y, Furuhashi A, Koyano K. Current barrier membranes: titanium mesh and other membranes for guided bone regeneration in dental applications. J Prosthodont Res. 2013; 57 (1): 3-14.

  5. Seibert JS. Reconstruction of deformed, partially edentulous ridges, using full thickness onlay grafts. Part I. Technique and wound healing. Compend Contin Educ Dent. 1983; 4: 437-453.

  6. McGuire M, Nunn M. Prognosis versus actual outcome. II. The effectiveness of clinical parameters in developing an accurate prognosis. J Periodontol. 1996; 67 (7): 658-665.

  7. Abrams H, Kopczyk RA, Kaplan A. Incidence of anterior ridge deformities in partially edentulous patients. J Prosthet Dent. 1987; 57 (2): 191-194.

  8. Wang HL, Al-Shammari K. HVC ridge deficiency classification: a therapeutically oriented classification. Int J Periodontics Restorative Dent. 2002; 22 (4): 335-343.

  9. Caton J, Armitage G, Berglundh T, Chapple I, Jepsen S, Kornman K et al. A new classification scheme for periodontal and peri-implant diseases and conditions - Introduction and key changes from the 1999 classification. J Clin Periodontol. 2018; 89: 51-58.

  10. Camargo P, Melnick P, Kenney E. The use of free gingival grafts for aesthetic purposes. Periodontology 2000. 2001; 27 (1): 72-96.

  11. Agarwal A, Gupta ND. Alveolar ridge augmentation by connective tissue grafting using a pouch method and modified connective tissue technique: a prospective study. Dental Research Journal. 2015; 12 (6): 548-553.

  12. McAllister B, Haghighat K. Bone augmentation techniques. J Periodontol. 2007; 78 (3): 377-396.

  13. Plonka A, Urban I, Wang H. Decision tree for vertical ridge augmentation. The Int J Periodontics Restorative Dent. 2018; 38 (2): 269-275.

  14. Racia-dal Polo MR, Poli PP, Rancitelli D, Beretta M, Maiorana C. Alveolar ridge reconstruction with titanium meshes: a systematic review of the literature. Med Oral Patol Oral Cir Bucal. 2014; 19: 639-646.

  15. Al-Ardah, AlHelal A, Proussaefs P, AlBader B, Al humaidan A, Lozada J. Managing titanium mesh exposure with partial removal of the exposed site: a case series study. J Oral Implantology. 2017; 43 (6): 482-490.

  16. Wei A. Dental implant complications: etiology, prevention, and treatment. and by Stuart J. Froum. Journal of Prosthodontics. 2012; 21 (2): 155-155.




2020     |     www.medigraphic.com