medigraphic.com

2018, Number 5

<< Back Next >>

Cir Cir 2018; 86 (5)

Index of Mannheim and mortality in sepsis abdominal

González-Pérez LG, Sánchez-Delgado Y, Godínez-Vidal AR, Cruz- Manzano JF, Gutiérrez-Uvalle GE, Gracida-Mancilla NI

Language: Spanish
References: 16
Page: 423-427
PDF size: 185.60 Kb.


ABSTRACT

Background: Abdominal sepsis represents the host’s peritoneal inflammatory response to microbial invasion, which may be mild or severe, depending on the degree of contamination of the peritoneal cavity; with a reported mortality of 17%. The Mannheim peritonitis index is a clinical tool and a predictor of mortality in patients with peritonitis, with high sensitivity and specificity. Objective: To determine if there is a correlation between the score obtained by the Mannheim peritonitis index, and mortality, in patients with abdominal sepsis. Method: A retrospective, observational, cross-sectional study, during the period between July 2013 and January 2014, in patients diagnosed with abdominal sepsis, attended at the General Hospital of Mexico Dr. Eduardo Liceaga. Results: We included 177 cases, 85 of the female sex and 92 of the male sex. The average age was 43 years. The most common organ responsible for abdominal sepsis was the appendix. Mortality of 18 cases (10.2%). The cases were divided, according to the Mannheim index, in mild cases (‹ 25 points) and severe case (› 26 points). Of 27 severe cases, 8 (29.6%) died, while of the 150 mild cases 10 (6.7%) died (odds ratio: 5.895; 95% confidence interval: 2.071- 16.77; p ‹ 0.05). Conclusions: The Mannheim scale is a good predictor of mortality for patients with abdominal sepsis. The optimal cut-off point is 20.


REFERENCES

  1. Townsend Jr CM, Beauchamp RD, Evers BM, Mattox KL. Sabiston Textbook of Surgery. 18th ed. Philadelphia: WB Saunders. 2008.

  2. Carrillo-Esper R, Carrillo-Córdova JR, Carrillo-Córdova LD. Estudio epidemiológico de la sepsis en unidades de terapia intensiva mexicanas. Cir Cir. 2009;77(4).

  3. Pulido Cejudo A. FACS. Tratamiento médico en sepsis abdominal. Infección en cirugía. Cirujano General. 2011;33(Supl 1).

  4. Dombrovskiy VY, Martin AA, Sunderram J, Paz HL. Rapid increase in hospitalization and mortality rates for severe sepsis in the United States: a trend analysis from 1993 to 2003. Crit Care Med. 2007;35:1244.

  5. Sánchez Velázquez LD, Reyes Sánchez ME, D’Ector Lira DM, Bonilla Rivera LC, González González A, Magdaleno Padilla ML, et al. Discriminación y calibración de cuatro escalas de calificación del síndrome de disfunción orgánica múltiple. Estudio multicéntrico. Rev Asoc Mex Med Crit y Ter Int 2001;15(3):80-86.

  6. Pardo Cabello AJ, Bermudo Conde S, Manzano Gamero MV. Prevalencia y factores asociados a desnutrición entre pacientes ingresados en un hospital de media-larga estancia. Nutr Hosp. 2011;26:369-75.

  7. John MA, Bohnen MD, Mustard RA, Oxholm SE, Schouten BD. APACHE II Score and Abdominal Sepsis A Prospective Study, RN Arch Surg. 1988;123(2):225-22.

  8. Vincent JL and Moreno R. Clinical review: Scoring systems in the critically ill. Critical Care 2010, 14:207.

  9. Mesejo Arizmendi A, Blasco Cortés ML, Gabaldón Coronado J. Manual básico de nutrición clínica y dietética. Hospital Clínico Universitario de Valencia; 2000. p. 17-8.

  10. Kreger BE, Craven DE, McCabe WR. Gram-negative bacteremia. IV. Re-evaluation of clinical features and treatment in 612 patients. Am J Med. 1980;68:344.

  11. Planas Vilá M, Montejo JC. Metodología aplicada en la valoración del estado nutricional. Libro blanco de la desnutrición clínica en España. Fundación Española de la Nutrición (FEN). 2013.

  12. Bauer J, Capra S. Comparison of a malnutrition-screening tool with subjective global assessment in hospitalized patients with cancer: sensitivity and specificity. Asia Pac J Clin Nutr. 2003;12:257-60.

  13. Sharma R, Ranjan V, Jain S, Joshi T, Tyagi A, Chaphekar R. A prospective study evaluating utility of Mannheim peritonitis index in predicting prognosis of perforation peritonitis. J Nat Sci Biol Med. 2015;6(Suppl 1):49-S52.

  14. Sharma R, Ranjan V, Jain S, Joshi T, Tyagi A, Chaphekar R. A prospective study evaluating utility of Mannheim peritonitis index in predicting prognosis of perforation peritonitis. J Nat Sci Biol Med. 2015;6(Suppl1): S49-52.

  15. Salamone G, Licari L, Falco N, Augello G, Tutino R, Campanella S, et al. Mannheim Peritonitis Index (MPI) and elderly population: prognostic evaluation in acute secondary peritonitis. G Chir. 2016;37:243-9.

  16. Muralidhar VA, Madhu CP, Sudhir S, Srinivasarangan M. Efficacy of Mannheim Peritonitis Index (MPI) score in patients with secondary peritonitis. J Clin Diagn Res. 2014;8 NC01-3.




2020     |     www.medigraphic.com