2018, Number S1
<< Back
Acta Med 2018; 16 (S1)
Towards proper dialysis. Kt/V versus KT debate. What is our best option?
Ramos GJM, Peña RJC
Language: Spanish
References: 28
Page: 76-82
PDF size: 171.26 Kb.
ABSTRACT
For many years, the Kt/V of urea was used as a tool for the measurement of the dialysis dose based on the kinetic model of urea. However, it has the following disadvantages: Kt/V was developed in a time when cellulose dialyzers with small pores were used; the evidence of the toxicity of urea is limited; urea clearance does not represent the kinetic behavior of other uremic molecules; in addition, the determination of Kt/V of urea in a single session is not representative of what happens in the rest of the sessions; the taking of blood samples for postdialysis BUN determination is frequently prone to errors, and finally, the Kt/V tends to over-estimate the dose of dialysis in patients with low body mass index or malnutrition. Using the Kt has advantages: both the K and the t are real machine measurements by dialysance (DI), not manipulated by the user, and they can be used in all dialysis sessions. The main recommendations in 1999 were made according to sex, with a minimum Kt of 40-45 L for women and 45-50 L for men. A study was recently published suggesting that increasing the dose of Kt three or more liters decreases mortality and hospitalization risk; however, more research with different populations is needed to confirm its usefulness.
REFERENCES
Lowrie EG, Laird NM, Parker TF, Sargent JA. Effect of the hemodialysis prescription of patient morbidity: report from the National Cooperative Dialysis Study. N Engl J Med. 1981; 305 (20): 1176-1181.
Gotch FA, Sargent JA. A mechanistic analysis of the National Cooperative Dialysis Study (NCDS). Kidney Int. 1985; 28 (3): 526-534.
Held PJ, Port FK, Wolfe RA, Stannard DC, Carroll CE, Daugirdas JT et al. The dose of hemodialysis and patient mortality. Kidney Int. 1996; 50 (2): 550-556.
Owen WF Jr, Lew NL, Liu Y, Lowrie EG, Lazarus JM. The urea reduction ratio and serum albumin concentration as predictors of mortality in patients undergoing hemodialysis. N Engl J Med. 1993; 329 (14): 1001-1006.
Saran R, Bragg-Gresham JL, Levin NW, Twardowski ZJ, Wizemann V, Saito A et al. Longer treatment time and slower ultrafiltration in hemodialysis: associations with reduced mortality in the DOPPS. Kidney Int. 2006; 69 (7): 1222-1228.
Vanholder R, De Smet R, Glorieux G, Argilés A, Baurmeister U, Brunet P et al. Review on uremic toxins: classification, concentration, and interindividual variability. Kidney Int. 2003; 63 (5): 1934-1943.
Eloot S, Schneditz D, Vanholder R. What can the dialysis physician learn from kinetic modelling beyond Kt/V(urea)? Nephrol Dial Transplant. 2012; 27 (11): 4021-4029.
Zhao D, Sonawane ND, Levin MH, Yang B. Comparative transport efficiencies of urea analogues through urea transporter UT-B. Biochim Biophys Acta. 2007; 1768 (7): 1815-1821.
Eloot S, Torremans A, De Smet R, Marescau B, De Wachter D, De Deyn PP et al. Kinetic behavior of urea is different from that of other water-soluble compounds: the case of the guanidino compounds. Kidney Int. 2005; 67 (4): 1566-1575.
Vanholder R, Schepers E, Pletinck A, Nagler EV, Glorieux G. The uremic toxicity of indoxyl sulfate and p-cresyl sulfate: a systematic review. J Am Soc Nephrol. 2014; 25 (9): 1897-1907.
Eloot S, Vanholder R. Kinetics of protein-bound solutes during hemodialysis. Int J Artif Organs. 2012; 35 (8): 583.
Evenepoel P, Bammens B, Verbeke K, Vanrenterghem Y. Superior dialytic clearance of beta(2)-microglobulin and p-cresol by high-flux hemodialysis as compared to peritoneal dialysis. Kidney Int. 2006; 70 (4): 794-799.
Stiller S, Xu XQ, Gruner N, Vienken J, Mann H. Validation of a two-pool model for the kinetics of beta2-microglobulin. Int J Artif Organs. 2002; 25 (5): 411-420.
Odell RA, Slowiaczek P, Moran JE, Schindhelm K. Beta 2-microglobulin kinetics in end-stage renal failure. Kidney Int. 1991; 39 (5): 909-919.
Leypoldt JK, Cheung AK, Deeter RB. Rebound kinetics of beta2-microglobulin after hemodialysis. Kidney Int. 1999; 56 (4): 1571-1577.
Locatelli F, Martin-Malo A, Hannedouche T, Loureiro A, Papadimitriou M, Wizemann V et al. Effect of membrane permeability on survival of hemodialysis patients. J Am Soc Nephrol. 2009; 20 (3): 645-654.
Eloot S, Van Biesen W, Dhondt A, Van de Wynkele H, Glorieux G, Verdonck P et al. Impact of hemodialysis duration on the removal of uremic retention solutes. Kidney Int. 2008; 73 (6): 765-770.
Eloot S, Van Biesen W, Glorieux G, Neirynck N, Dhondt A, Vanholder R. Does the adequacy parameter Kt/V(urea) reflect uremic toxin concentrations in hemodialysis patients? PLoS One. 2013; 8 (11): e76838.
Chertow GM, Owen WF, Lazarus JM, Lew NL, Lowrie EG. Exploring the reverse J-shaped curve between urea reduction ratio and mortality. Kidney Int. 1999; 56 (5): 1872-1878.
Lowrie EG, Chertow GM, Lew NL, Lazarus JM, Owen WF. The urea [clearance x dialysis time] product (Kt) as an outcome-based measure of hemodialysis dose. Kidney Int. 1999; 56 (2): 729-737.
Petitclerc T, Goux N, Reynier AL, Béné B. A model for non-invasive estimation of in vivo dialyzer performances and patient’s conductivity during hemodialysis. Int J Artif Organs. 1993; 16 (8): 585-591.
Lindsay RM, Bene B, Goux N, Heidenheim AP, Landgren C, Sternby J. Relationship between effective ionic dialysance and in vivo urea clearance during hemodialysis. Am J Kidney Dis. 2001; 38 (3): 565-574.
Mercadal L, Ridel C, Petitclerc T. Ionic dialysance: principle and review of its clinical relevance for quantification of hemodialysis efficiency. Hemodial Int. 2005; 9 (2): 111-119.
Lowrie EG, Li Z, Ofsthun N, Lazarus JM. The online measurement of hemodialysis dose (Kt): clinical outcome as a function of body surface area. Kidney Int. 2005; 68 (3): 1344-1354.
Lowrie EG, Li Z, Ofsthun NJ, Lazarus JM. Evaluating a new method to judge dialysis treatment using online measurements of ionic clearance. Kidney Int. 2006; 70 (1): 211-217.
Maduell F, Ramos R, Varas J, Martin-Malo A, Molina M, Pérez-Garcia R et al. Hemodialysis patients receiving a greater Kt dose than recommended have reduced mortality and hospitalization risk. Kidney Int. 2016; 90 (6): 1332-1341.
Spalding EM, Chandna SM, Davenport A, Farrington K. Kt/V underestimates the hemodialysis dose in women and small men. Kidney Int. 2008; 74 (3): 348-355.
Kumar S, Khosravi M, Massart A, Potluri M, Davenport A. The effects of racial differences on body composition and total body water measured by multifrequency bioelectrical impedance analysis influence delivered Kt/V dialysis dosing. Nephron Clin Pract. 2013; 124 (1-2): 60-66.