medigraphic.com
ISSN 0016-3813 (Print)

2018, Number 2

<< Back Next >>

Gac Med Mex 2018; 154 (2)

Apoyo social y marginación como determinantes de la atención prenatal en mujeres con seguridad social en México

Maldonado-Cisneros M, Medina-Gómez OS

Language: Spanish
References: 23
Page: 180-184
PDF size: 139.90 Kb.


ABSTRACT

Introduction: Prenatal care ensures favorable results for maternal-fetal health and, to that end, it must be provided early, periodically, comprehensively and with high coverage. Objective: To find out the social determinants of prenatal care in women affiliated to the Mexican Institute of Social Security during 2014. Method: Cross-sectional study where the association of social conditions, social support and family functioning with inadequate prenatal care was analyzed. A descriptive analysis was performed; hypothesis tests were used with chi-square (95% level of confidence). The prevalence ratio and Mann-Whitney’s U-test were estimated to compare medians and logistic regression. Results: Of the interviewed women, 58.1% had inadequate prenatal care, mainly associated with unplanned pregnancy, poor social support, low level of education and higher marginalization. Not having leaves of absence granted by employers was the main barrier in those women who did not attend health services. Conclusions: There is a need for strategies to be designed and implemented to enable understanding the interaction between different biological and social dimensions of the health-disease process and reduce health inequities that affect pregnant women, in order to achieve good prenatal care and to implement alternative models guaranteeing its efficiency.


REFERENCES

  1. Grupo de Trabajo Regional Interagencial Regional para la Reducción de la Mortalidad Materna. Reducción de la mortalidad y la morbilidad materna. Consenso Estratégico Interagencial para América Latina y el Caribe. EE. UU.: OPS; 2003.

  2. Cáceres-Manrique FM, Molina-Marín G. Inequidades sociales en atención materna. Rev Colomb Obstet Ginecol. 2010;61(3):231-238.

  3. Observatorio de Mortalidad Materna en México. Situación actual de la mortalidad materna en México. Disponible en: http://www omm org mx/ index.php/component/k2/item/246-situacion-actual

  4. Secretaría de Salud. Norma Oficial Mexicana NOM-007-SSA2-1993, atención de la mujer durante el embarazo, parto y puerperio y del recién nacido. Criterios y procedimientos para la prestación del servicio. Diario Oficial de la Federación 1994 Oct 31. Disponible en: http //www salud. gob.mx/unidades/cdi/nom/007ssa23.html

  5. Kisuule I, Kaye DK, Najjuka F, Ssematimba SK, Arinda A, Nakitend G, et al. Timing and reasons for coming late for the first antenatal care visit by pregnant women at Mulago hospital, Kampala Uganda. BMC Pregnancy Childbirth. 2013;13(1):121.

  6. Niwaru BI, Wu Z, Hemminki E. Determinants of the use of prenatal care in rural China: the role of care content. Matern Child Health J. 2012:16(1):235-241.

  7. Joshi C, Torvaldsen S, Hodgson R, Hayen A. Factors associated with the use and quality of antenatal care in Nepal: a population-based study using the demographic and health survey data. BMC Pregnancy Childbirth. 2014;14:94.

  8. Andrew E, Pell C, Angwin A, Auwun A, Daniels J, Mueller I, et al. Factors affecting attendance at and timing of formal antenatal care: results from a qualitative study in Madang, Papua New Guinea. PloS One. 2014; 9(5):e93025.

  9. Cresswell JA, Yu G, Hatherall B, Morris J, Jamal F, Harden A, et al. Predictors of the timing of initiation of antenatal care in an ethnically diverse urban cohort in the UK. BMC Pregnancy Childbirth. 2013; 13(1):103.

  10. Rowe RE, Magee H, Quigley MA, Heron P, Askham J, Brocklehurst P. Social and ethnic differences in attendance for antenatal care in England. Public Health. 2012;122(12):1363-1372.

  11. Guliani H, Sepehri A, Serieux J. Determinants of prenatal care use: evidence from 32 low-income countries across Asia, Sub-Saharan Africa and Latin America. Health Policy Plan. 2014;29(5) 589-602.

  12. Beeckman K, Louckx F, Downe S, Putman K. The relationship between antenatal care and preterm birth: the importance of content of care. Eur J Public Health. 2013;23(3):366-371.

  13. Pérez-Toga G, Sánchez-Nuncio HF, Pérez-Rodríguez PP, Nava-Vázquez F. Impacto del control prenatal en la morbilidad y mortalidad neonatal. Rev Med Inst Mex Seguro Soc. 2005;43(5):377-380.

  14. Beauclair R, Petro G, Myer L. The association between timing of initiation of antenatal care and stillbirths: a retrospective cohort study of pregnant women in Cape Town, South Africa. BMC Pregnancy Childbirth. 2014;14:204.

  15. Hollowell J, Oakley L, Kurinczuk JJ, Brocklehurst P, Gray R. The effectiveness of antenatal care programmes to reduce infant mortality and preterm birth in socially disadvantaged and vulnerable women in high-income countries: a systematic review. BMC Pregnancy Childbirth. 2011;11:13.

  16. Faneite P, Rivera C, Rodríguez F, Amato R, Moreno S, Cangemi L. Consulta Prenatal: motivos de inasistencia, ¿se justifica? Rev Obstet Ginecol Venez. 2009;69(3):147-151.

  17. Coimbra L, Silva AA, Mochel EG, Alves MT, Ribeiro V, Aragão VM, et al. Factors associated with inadequacy of prenatal care utilization. Rev Saude Publica. 2003;37(4):456-462.

  18. Pécora A, San-Martin ME, Cantero A, Furfaro K, Jankovic MP, Llompart V. Control prenatal tardío: ¿barreras en el sistema de salud? Rev Hosp Mat Infant Ramón Sardá. 2008;27(3):114-119.

  19. Arispe C, Salgado M, Tang G, González C, Rojas JL. Frecuencia de CPN inadecuado y de factores asociados a su ocurrencia. Rev Med Hered. 2011;22(4):159-160.

  20. Ramírez-Zetina M, Richardson V, Ávila H, Caraveo VE, Salomón RE, Bacardi M, et al. La atención prenatal en la ciudad fronteriza de Tijuana, México. Rev Panam Salud Pública. 2000;7(2):97-101.

  21. Vega R, Barron A, Acosta L. Atención prenatal según la NOM-007 relacionada con morbilidad materna en una unidad de salud en San Luis Potosí durante 2008. Rev Fac Nac Salud Publica. 2013;3(3):265-272.

  22. Medina-Gómez OS, López-Arellano O. Asociación de los tipos de carencia y grado de desarrollo humano con la mortalidad infantil en México, 2008. Cad Saúde Pública. 2011;27(8):1603-1610.

  23. Krans EE, Davis MM. Strong start for mothers and newborns: implications for prenatal care delivery. Curr Opin Obstet Gynecol. 2014;26(6) 511-515.




2020     |     www.medigraphic.com