2018, Number 1
<< Back
Rev Mex Neuroci 2018; 19 (1)
Surgical management of craniosynostosis in a second level hospital. 5 years' experience
Dávalos-Ruiz E, Haro-Acosta ME, Soria-Rodríguez CG, Lopez-Lopez L, Román-Matus A
Language: Spanish
References: 28
Page: 117-126
PDF size: 336.43 Kb.
ABSTRACT
Introduction: craniosynostosis is caused by the early closure of skull
sutures in the child, this can be classified in relation to affected sutures
or if it is associated with a genetic syndrome. The definitive diagnosis
is made with tomography and the management must be surgical,
together with other disciplines. There is evidence of the management
of this pathology in hospitals of third level of care but scarce in a second
level.
Objective: to characterize patients with craniosynostosis surgically
treated in a second level hospital during the 2011-2016 period.
Method: retrospective study where 24 records were reviewed,
the variables of sex, age at surgery, type of craniosynostosis, surgical
technique used, use of absorbable miniplates and postoperative
complications were analyzed, after authorization by the Local Research
Committee and the director of the hospital.
Results: we analyzed 24 cases of patients with a diagnosis of
craniosynostosis, surgically operated in the HGP / MF 31 of IMSS in
Mexicali, B.C., during the period 2011-2016, of which 9 were girls and
15 children. The mean age at the time of surgery was 10.5 months. The
type of craniosynostosis by gender, in girls the previous plagiocephaly
was the most common in 16.6%. In children, scaphocephaly
predominated in 29.2%. The age at the time of surgery varied in relation
to the type of craniosynostosis; the most used surgical technique was
modified calvarectomy in 37.5%. In all surgeries, absorbable miniplates
were used, except for modified calvarectomy. In only one case surgical
wound infection occurred.
Conclusion: this study shows that this type of surgeries can be
performed in a hospital of second level of care, as long as they have
trained staff and the necessary equipment.
REFERENCES
Albright A, Pollack I, Adelson P. Craniosynostosis. Principles and practice of pediatric neurosurgery. New York, U.S. Third Ed. Thieme Medical Publishers. 2015. p.237-48.
Castro Coyotl D, Rosas Huerta X, Sánchez Vázquez J, Díaz Sánchez M, Rodríguez Peralta J, Tetitla Munive J, et al. Guía de práctica clínica para el diagnóstico, tratamiento y rehabilitación de craneosinostosis no sindrómica en los 3 niveles de atención. Cir Cir 2016; en impresión.
Twigg S, Forecki J, Goos J, Richardson I, Hoogeboom A, Van Den Ouweland A, et al. Gain-of-function mutations in ZIC1 are associated with coronal craniosynostosis and learning disability. Am J Hum Genet. 2015; 97 (3): 378-88.
Twigg S, Wilkie A. A genetic-pathophysiological framework for craniosynostosis. Am J Hum Genet. 2015; 97 (3): 359-77.
Rozovsky K, Udjus K, Wilson N, Barrowman N, Simanovsky N, Miller E. Cranial ultrasound as a firstline imaging examination for craniosynostosis. Pediatrics. 2016; 137 (2): e20152230.
Pagnoni M, Fadda M, Spalice A, Amodeo G, Ursitti F, Mitro V, et al. Surgical timing of craniosynostosis: What to do and when. J Cranio Maxill Surg. 2014; 42 (5): 513-9.
Cornelissen M, Ottelander B, Rizopoulos D, Van Der Hulst R, Van Der Molen AM, Van Der Horst C, et al. Increase of prevalence of craniosynostosis. J Cranio Maxill Surg. 2016; 44 (9): 1273-9.
Morris L. Nonsyndromic craniosynostosis and deformational head shape disorders. Facial Plast Surg Clin North Am. 2016; 24 (4): 517-30.
Ishii M, Sun J, Ting M, Maxson R. The Development of the Calvarial Bones and Sutures and the Pathophysiology of Craniosynostosis. Curr Top Dev Biol. 2015; 131-156.
Lloyd M, Buchanan E, Khechoyan D. Review of quantitative outcome analysis of cranial morphology in craniosynostosis. J Plast Reconstr Aesthet Surg. 2016; 69 (11):1464-8.
Bernés Rodríguez M., Montesinos Sampedro A. Experiencia de 5 años en el manejo de las craneosinostosis en el Hospital de Juárez de México [Tesis]. México D.F.; 2014.
Czerwinski M, Kolar J, Fearon J. Complex craniosynostosis. Plast Reconstr Surg. 2011; 128 (4): 955- 61.
Diagnóstico, tratamiento y rehabilitación de craneosinostosis no sindrómica en los tres niveles de atención. Resumen de evidencias y recomendaciones: Guía de Práctica Clínica. México: Secretaría de Salud, CENETEC, 2015 [Accesado: 04/06/2017] Disponible en: http:77www.cenetec.salud.gob.mx/ contenidos/gpc/catalogoMaestroGPC.html#
Fontes D, Natoli Ó, Pinyot J. Estudio de la craneosinostosis por tomografía computarizada. Imagen Diagn. 2011; 2 (2): 47-52.
Allareddy V. Prevalence and impact of complications on hospitalization outcomes following surgical repair for craniosynostosis. J Oral Maxillofac Surg. 2014; 72 (12): 2522-30.
Puente-Espel J, RÍos-Lara y López R, Moreno-Álvarez M, Morel-Fuentes E. Craniosynostosis: A multidisciplinary approach based on medical, social and demographic factors in a developing country. Rev Med Hosp Gen. (Mex) 2016; 79 (4): 230-9.
Boulos P, Lin K, Jane Jr. J, Jane Sr. J. Correction of sagittal synostosis using a modified method. Clin Plast Surg. 2004; 31 (3):489-498.
Delgado Hernandez C, Mendizábal Guerra R, Muñoz Bellizzia J, Soto Barraza J, Ayala Arcipreste A, Acosta Garcés R et al. Escafocefalia: descripción de la técnica quirúrgica y revisión de la literatura de las opciones en el manejo quirúrgico. Rev Hosp Jua Mex. 2008; 75 (3):213-7.
Garmendía García F, López Díaz Z. Tratamiento de la escafocefalia por la técnica de Green y Wininstaken (1999-2009). Rev Haban Cienc Med. 2010; 9 (3): 385-94.
Daniel D, Rao G. Trigonocephaly: a case series. J Oral Maxillofac Surg Med Pathol. 2016; 28 (1): 47-50.
Aldridge K, Collett B, Wallace E, Birgfeld C, Austin J, Yeh R, et al. Structural brain differences in school-age children with and without single-suture craniosynostosis. J Neurosurg Pediatr. 2017; en impression.
Zakhary G, Montes D, Woerner J, Notarianni C, Ghali G. Surgical correction of craniosynostosis. A review of 100 cases. J Craniomaxillofac Surg. 2014; 42 (8):1684-91.
Allareddy V. Prevalence and impact of complications on hospitalization outcomes following surgical repair for craniosynostosis. J Oral Maxillofac Surg 2014; 72 (12): 2522-30.
Esparza J, Hinojosa J, García-Recuero I, Romance A, Pascual B, Martínez de Aragón A. Tratamiento quirúrgico de las craneosinostosis aisladas y sindromáticas. Resultados y complicaciones en 283 casos consecutivo. Neurocirugía. 2008; 19 (6): 509-29.
León Ortiz A, Rueda Franco F, Marcial Anaya J. Craneosinostosis no sindromática experiencia de 10 años en el Instituto Nacional de Pediatría. [Tesis]. México, D.F: 2010.
Andrade Del Rio A, Hernández Salazar M. Craneosinostosis: Casuística del 2005 al 2010 y resultados quirúrgicos de pacientes manejados en el C.M.N. “20 de Noviembre” I.S.S.S.T.E. [Tesis]. México, D.F: 2010.
Bellew, M. and Chumas, P. (2015). Long-term developmental follow-up in children with nonsyndromic craniosynostosis. J Neurosurg Pediatr. 16 (4), pp.445-451.
Kim Soi S. Immediate Spontaneous Shape Correction Using Expantile Zigzag Craniectomy in Infantile Scaphocephaly -Is There an Improvement in the Developmental Quotient Following Surgery?. J Korean Neurosurg Soc. 2011; 49 (3): 194.