medigraphic.com
ISSN 0185-3252 (Print)
Revista de la Asociación Médica del Centro Médico ABC

2005, Number 4

<< Back Next >>

An Med Asoc Med Hosp ABC 2005; 50 (4)

Lidocaine to release cardiovascular response in endotracheal intubation in hypertensive patients. Comparison of three administrations methods

Briones CG, Álvarez GR, Baltazar BVM, Zambada ZC, González VMA, García ÁA, Tamayo LAE

Language: Spanish
References: 22
Page: 163-167
PDF size: 63.06 Kb.


ABSTRACT

Objective: To determine which method of lidocaine administration: parenteral, dose measured in aerosol or nebulizer is more effective to release cardiovascular response in endotracheal intubation of hipertensive patients. Material and methods: 60 patients between 35 and 80 years old, scheduled for elective surgery were studied. They were randomly assigned in to four groups of 15 patients; group I or control; group II: lidocaine dose measured in aerosol to 10% two shots; group III: lidocaine 2% 1.5 mg/kg IV and group IV: lidocaine 2% 1.5 mg/kg in nebulized form. Heart rate and blood pressure in the endotracheal intubation were evaluated. Results: Nebulized lidocaine group showed a significant difference (p ‹ 0.05) in heart rate and diastolic pressure with respect to others groups, in systolic pressure no to be differences. Conclusions: Lidocaine in nebulized form showed more effective to diminish the cardiovascular response in endotracheal intubation in hipertensive patients.


REFERENCES

  1. Singh S, Smith JE. Cardiovascular changes after the three stages of nasotracheal Intubation. BJA 2003; 91 (5): 667–671.

  2. Ovassapian A, Yelich SJ, Dykes MHM, Brunner EE. Blood pressure and heart rate changes during awake fiberoptic nasotracheal intubation. Anesth Analg 1983; 62: 951–954.

  3. Fraga M, Pérez BR. Caracterización de la respuesta cardiovascular (taquicardia e hipertensión) posterior a la intubación endotraqueal en pacientes pretratados con esmolol en dosis única. Rev Anest Mex 1994; 6 (3): 142-146.

  4. Figueredo E, García F. EM Assessment of the efficacy of esmolol on the haemodynamic changes induced by Laringoscopy and Tracheal Intubation: A meta-analysis. Acta Anaesth Scan 2001; 45 (8): 1011-1022.

  5. Feng CK, Chan KH, Lui KN, Or CH, Lee TY. A comparison of lidocaine, fentanyl, and esmolol for attenuation of cardiovascular response to laringoscopy and tracheal intubation. Acta Anaesth Scan 1996; 34 (2): 61-67.

  6. Miller CD, Warren SJ. IV lidocaine fails to attenuate the cardiovascular response to laringoscopy and tracheal intubation. Br J Anaesth 1990; 65: 216-219.

  7. Barash PG. Anestesia clínica. 3a ed. México: McGraw-HillInteramericana, 1997; 688-690.

  8. Pastor L. Anestesia cardiovascular. 2a ed. México: McGrawHill-Interamericana, 1997; 362-363.

  9. Prengel AW, Rembecki M, Wenzel V, Steinbach G. A Comparison of the endotracheal tube and the laryngeal mask airway as a route for endobronchial lidocaine administration. Anesth Analg 2001; 92 (6): 1505-1509.

  10. Nishikawa K, Kawana S, Nawiky A. Comparison of the lightwand technique with direct laryngoscopy for awake endotracheal intubation in emergency cases. J Clin Anesth 2001; 13 (4): 447-454.

  11. Takahashi S, Mitzutani T, Miyabe M, Toyooka H. Hemodynamic responses to tracheal intubation with laryngoscope versus lightwand intubating device (trachlight) in adults with normal airway. Anesth Analg 2002; 95 (29): 480-484.

  12. Nishikawa K, Omote K, Kawana S, Namiki A. A comparison of hemodynamic changes after endotracheal intubation by using the lightwand device and the laringoscope in normotensive and hypertensive patients. Anesth Analg 2000; 90 (5): 1203-1207.

  13. Huang YF, Upton RN, Rutten AJ, Runciman WR. IV bolus administration of subconvulsive doses of lidocaine to conscius shepp: Effects on circulatory function. Br J Anaesth 1992; 69: 368-374.

  14. Goodman & Gilman. Las bases farmacológicas de la terapéutica. 9a ed. México: McGraw-Hill-Interamericana, 1997; 353-371.

  15. Katzung GB. Farmacología básica y clínica. 7a ed. México: Manual Moderno, 1999; 497-506.

  16. Lin PL, Wang YP, Chou YM, Chan HL, Huang HH. Lack of intravenous Lidocaine effects on HRV changes of tracheal intubation during induction of General Anesthesia. Acta Anaesth Scan 2001; 39 (2): 77-82.

  17. Hernández PJ, Tortosa SJA, García PC, Molero ME, Burguillos LS, Perez FD. Cardiovascular response to tracheal intubation in patients with intracranial tumor. Comparative study between uropidil and lidocaine. Rev Esp Anestesiol Reanim 2000; 47 (4): 146- 150.

  18. Levitt MD, Dresden GM. The efficacy of esmolol versus lidocaine to attenuate the hemodynamic response to intubation in isolated head trauma patients. Acad Emerg Med 2001; 8 (1): 19-24.

  19. Skalar BZ, Laurie S, Ezri T, Krichelli D, Savir Y, Soroker D. Nebulized lidocaine response to tracheal intubation. J Clin Anesth 1992; 4 (5): 382-385.

  20. Groeben H, Groswendt T, Silvanus MT, Pavlakovic G, Peters J. Airway anesthesia alone does not explain attenuation of histamine-induced bronchospasm by local anesthetics: A comparison of lidocaine, ropivacaine and dyclonine. Anesthesiology 2001; 94 (3): 519-526.

  21. Mailand PA, Kong AS, Chung DC, Chan CHS, Lai CKW. Absorption of lidocaine during aspiration anesthesia of the airway. J Clin Anesth 2001; 13 (6): 1143-1149.

  22. Hamaya Y, Dohi S. Differences in cardiovascular response to airway stimulation at different sites and blockade of the responses by lidocaine. Anesthesiology 2000; 93 (1): 95-103.




2020     |     www.medigraphic.com