medigraphic.com
ISSN 1870-199X (Print)
Órgano oficial de la Facultad de Odontología, UNAM

2017, Number 4

<< Back Next >>

Rev Odont Mex 2017; 21 (4)

Comparative study of displacement resistance of four zirconia cements

Ríos SE, Garcilazo GA, Guerrero IJ, Meade RI, Miguelena MK

Language: Spanish
References: 35
Page: 235-240
PDF size: 234.14 Kb.


ABSTRACT

Objective: To compare displacement resistance of four cementing agents. Material and methods: An experimental, cross-sectioned prospective research was conducted to assess four cementing agents. Three agents were resinous, self-adhesive, dual polymerization cements containing MDP (10-metacryloxydecyl dihydrogen phosphate), and the remaining was a conventional glass ionomer cement. In the experiment, 40 samples of zirconia partially stabilized with yttrium were prepared. All samples were treated following their specific manufacturer’s instructions. Samples were prepared, they were then stored at 100% humidity in a temperature chamber at 37 oC for 24 hours; after this, samples were subjected to shearing detachment mechanical tests at a 1 mm per minute speed in a universal machine for mechanical testing. Results: Glass ionomer samples failed before being taken to the universal testing machine. Remaining three cements did not show statistically significant differences. Conclusions: Adhesion capacity of glass ionomer to zirconia is nil or extremely low. Likewise, resinous cements containing MDP in their formula, either in their bonding agent or in the cement formulation itself, are presently the best alternative to increase adhesion to a zirconia structure.


REFERENCES

  1. Cranin AN, Schnitman PA, Rabkin SM, Onesto EJ. Alumina and zirconia coated vitallium oral endosteal implants in beagles. J Biomed Mater Res. 1975; 9 (4): 257-262.

  2. Minamizato T. Slip-cast zirconia dental roots with tunnels drilled by laser process. J Prosthet Dent. 1990; 63 (6): 677-684.

  3. Springate SD, Winchester LJ. An evaluation of zirconium oxide brackets: a preliminary laboratory and clinical report. Br J Orthod. 1991; 18 (3): 203-209.

  4. Meyenberg KH, Lüthy H, Schärer P. Zirconia posts: a new all-ceramic concept for nonvital abutment teeth. J Esthet Dent. 1995; 7 (2): 73-80.

  5. Luthardt RG, Sandkuhl O, Reitz B. Zirconia-TZP and alumina--advanced technologies for the manufacturing of single crowns. Eur J Prosthodont Restor Dent. 1999; 7 (4): 113-119.

  6. Yildirim M, Edelhoff D, Hanisch O, Spiekermann H. Ceramic abutments--a new era in achieving optimal esthetics in implant dentistry. Int J Periodontics Restorative Dent. 2000; 20 (1): 81-91.

  7. McMeeking RM, Evans AG. Mechanics of transformation-toughening in brittle materials. J Am Ceram Soc. 1982; 65 (5): 242-246.

  8. Montagna F, Barbesi M. Cerámicas, zirconio y CAD/CAM. México: Amolca; 2013. p. 151-169.

  9. Piconi C, Rimondini L, Cerroni L. El zirconio en odontología. México: Amolca; 2011. p. 18-39.

  10. Piconi C, Maccauro G. Zirconia as a ceramic biomaterial. Biomaterials. 1999; 20 (1): 1-25.

  11. Porstendörfer J, Reineking A, Willert HC. Radiation risk estimation based on activity measurements of zirconium oxide implants. J Biomed Mater Res. 1996; 32 (4): 663-667.

  12. Chevalier J. What future for zirconia as a biomaterial? Biomaterials. 2006; 27 (4): 535-543.

  13. Manicone PF, Rossi Iommetti P, Raffaelli L. An overview of zirconia ceramics: basic properties and clinical applications. J Dent. 2007; 35 (11): 819-826.

  14. Blatz MB, Sadan A, Kern M. Resin-ceramic bonding: a review of the literature. J Prosthet Dent. 2003; 89 (3): 268-274.

  15. Palacios RP, Johnson GH, Phillips KM, Raigrodski AJ. Retention of zirconium oxide ceramic crowns with three types of cement. J Prosthet Dent. 2006; 96 (2): 104-114.

  16. Ernst CP, Cohnen U, Stender E, Willershausen B. In vitro retentive strength of zirconium oxide ceramic crowns using different luting agents. J Prosthet Dent. 2005; 93 (6): 551-558.

  17. Ozcan M, Vallittu PK. Effect of surface conditioning methods on the bond strength of luting cement to ceramics. Dent Mater. 2003; 19 (8): 725-731.

  18. Aboushelib MN, Kleverlaan CJ, Feilzer AJ. Selective infiltration-etching technique for a strong and durable bond of resin cements to zirconia-based materials. J Prosthet Dent. 2007; 98 (5): 379-388.

  19. Echeverri DM, Garzón H. Cementación de estructuras para prótesis parcial fija en zirconia. Rev Fac Odontol Univ Antioq. 2013; 24 (2): 321-335.

  20. Yoshida K, Tsuo Y, Atsuta M. Bonding of dual-cured resin cement to zirconia ceramic using phosphate acid ester monomer and zirconate coupler. J Biomed Mater Res B Appl Biomater. 2006; 77 (1): 28-33.

  21. Vult von Steyern P, Carlson P, Nilner K. All-ceramic fixed partial dentures designed according to the DC-Zirkon technique. A 2-year clinical study. J Oral Rehabil. 2005; 32 (3): 180-187.

  22. Tinschert J, Schulze KA, Natt G, Latzke P, Heussen N, Spiekermann H. Clinical behavior of zirconia-based fixed partial dentures made of DC-Zirkon: 3-year results. Int J Prosthodont. 2008; 21 (3): 217-222.

  23. Jørgensen KD. The relationship between retention and convergence angle in cemented veneer crowns. Acta Odontol Scand. 1955; 13 (1): 35-40.

  24. Marchan S, Coldero L, Whiting R, Barclay S. In vitro evaluation of the retention of zirconia-based ceramic posts luted with glass ionomer and resin cements. Braz Dent J. 2005; 16 (3): 213-217.

  25. Uo M, Sjögren G, Sundh A, Goto M, Watari F, Bergman M. Effect of surface condition of dental zirconia ceramic (Denzir) on bonding. Dent Mater J. 2006; 25 (3): 626-631.

  26. Shahin R, Kern M. Effect of air-abrasion on the retention of zirconia ceramic crowns luted with different cements before and after artificial aging. Dent Mater. 2010; 26 (9): 922-928.

  27. Kern M, Wegner SM. Bonding to zirconia ceramic: adhesion methods and their durability. Dent Mater. 1998; 14 (1): 64-71.

  28. Amaral R, Ozcan M, Valandro LF, Balducci I, Bottino MA. Effect of conditioning methods on the microtensile bond strength of phosphate monomer-based cement on zirconia ceramic in dry and aged conditions. J Biomed Mater Res B Appl Biomater. 2008; 85 (1): 1-9.

  29. Ozcan M, Nijhuis H, Valandro LF. Effect of various surface conditioning methods on the adhesion of dual-cure resin cement with MDP functional monomer to zirconia after thermal aging. Dent Mater J. 2008; 27 (1): 99-104.

  30. Tanaka R, Fujishima A, Shibata Y, Manabe A, Miyazaki T. Cooperation of phosphate monomer and silica modification on zirconia. J Dent Res. 2008; 87 (7): 666-670.

  31. Wegner SM, Kern M. Long-term resin bond strength to zirconia ceramic. J Adhes Dent. 2000; 2 (2): 139-147.

  32. Magne P, Paranhos MP, Burnett LH Jr. New zirconia primer improves bond strength of resin-based cements. Dent Mater. 2010; 26 (4): 345-352.

  33. McLaughlin G. Porcelain fused to tooth--a new esthetic and reconstructive modality. Compend Contin Educ Dent. 1984; 5 (5): 430-435.

  34. Corts JP. Carillas o frentes estéticos y sus variantes. In: Lanata EJ y col. Atlas de operatoria dental. Buenos Aires: Alfaomega; 2008. p. 251.

  35. Corts JP. Restauraciones indirectas adheridas anteriores. In: Henostroza G. Adhesión en Odont Rest de ALODYB. Madrid, España: Ripano SA; 2010. p. 34.




2020     |     www.medigraphic.com