medigraphic.com
ISSN 2007-8560 (Print)
Órgano Oficial de Difusión Científica de la Federación Mexicana de Colegios de Ortopedia y Traumatología, A.C. (FEMECOT)

2017, Number 1

<< Back Next >>

Ortho-tips 2017; 13 (1)

Complications in patients with periprosthetic hip infection. Interposition arthroplasty versus revision arthroplasty

Domínguez-de la Peña MA, Morales-de los Santos R, Miguel-Pérez A, Rivera-Villa AH, Briceño-González CY, Pérez-Atanasio JM

Language: Spanish
References: 14
Page: 30-35
PDF size: 171.28 Kb.


ABSTRACT

The objective of the present study was to compare the complications presented in postoperative patients of hip replacement arthroplasty vs. revision arthroplasty as periprosthetic infection management. Material and methods: A retrospective and comparative cross-sectional study included patients with septic loosening of the hip with revision or interposition arthroplasty during the period from 2013 to 2015 with a three-month follow-up, grouping complications into major and minor systemic and major and minor locals. Results: The demographic homogeneity of the population was adequate. There were no statistically significant differences in the complications compared between the two groups.


REFERENCES

  1. Bozic KJ, Ong K, Lau E, Kurtz SM, Vail TP, Rubash HE, et al. Risk of complication and revision total hip arthroplasty among medicare patients with different bearing surfaces. Clin Orthop Relat Res. 2010; 468 (9): 2357-2362.

  2. Malcolm TL, Gad BV, Elsharkawy KA, Higuera CA. Complication, survival, and reoperation rates following Girdlestone resection arthroplasty. J Arthroplasty. 2015; 30 (7): 1183-1186.

  3. Helwig P, Morlock J, Oberst M, Hauschild O, Hübner J, Borde J, et al. Periprosthetic joint infection-effect on quality of life. Int Orthop [Internet]. 2014; 38 (5): 1077-1081.

  4. Malizos KN, Poultsides LA. The socio-economic burden of musculoskeletal infections. In: Meani E, Romano C, Crosby L, Hofmann G, editor. Infection and local treatment in orthopedic surgery. GERMANY: Springer; 2007. pp. 1-10.

  5. Phillips JE, Crane TP, Noy M, Elliott TS, Grimer RJ. The incidence of deep prosthetic infections in a specialist orthopaedic hospital: hospital: a 15-year prospective survey. J Bone Joint Surg Br. 2006; 88 (7): 943-948.

  6. Romanò CL, Romanò D, Logoluso N, Meani E. Septic versus aseptic hip revision: how different ? J Orthopaed Traumatol. 2010; 11 (3): 167-174.

  7. Del Río-Alonso J, Valentí-Azcárate A, Duart-Clementea J, Valentín-Nina JR. Prótesis total de cadera tras artroplastia de resección. Rev Esp Cir Ortop Traumatol, 2006; 50: 414-418.

  8. Higuera CA, Elsharkawy K, Klika AK, Brocone M, Barsoum WK. 2010 Mid-America orthopaedic association physician in training award: predictors of early adverse outcomes after knee and hip arthroplasty in geriatric patients. Clin Orthop Relat Res. 2011; 469 (5): 1391-1400.

  9. Sharma H, De Leeuw J. RDI. Girdlestone resection arthroplasty following failed surgical procedures. Interntational Orthop. 2005; 29: 92-95.

  10. Barbarić K, Aljinović A, Dubravcić ID, Delimar D, Bicanić G. Patient satisfaction after revision hip arthroplasty or resection hip arthroplasty due to periprosthetic infection. Coll Antropol. 2014; 38 (2): 605-610.

  11. Basu I, Howes M, Jowett C, Levack B. Girdlestones excision arthroplasty: current update. Int J Surg. 2011; 9 (4): 310-313.

  12. Ritter MA, Farris A. Outcome of infected total joint replacement. Orthopedics. 2010; 33 (3). doi: 10.3928/01477447-20100129-09

  13. Cahill JL, Shadbolt B, Scarvell JM, Smith PN. Quality of life after infection in total joint replacement. J Orthop Surg (Hong Kong). 2008; 16 (1): 58-65.

  14. Bourne RB, Hunter GA, Rorabeck CH. A six-year replacements follow-up managed of by total Girdlestones’s in the management. Br Editor Soc Bone Jt Surg. 1969; 66-B: 340-346.




2020     |     www.medigraphic.com