medigraphic.com
ISSN 1405-8871 (Print)

2017, Number 1

<< Back Next >>

Aten Fam 2017; 24 (1)

Clinical Ability of the Family Medicine Physician on Preeclampsia-eclampsia in the Family Medicine Unit no. 94 of the IMSS

Villaseñor-Hidalgo R, García-Rangel MJ, Ramírez-Zaragoza HF, León-Ángeles SA

Language: Spanish
References: 21
Page: 27-31
PDF size: 482.38 Kb.


ABSTRACT

Objective: to determine the clinical aptitude of the family doctor about preeclampsia-eclampsia in the Family Medicine Unit no. 94 of the Mexican Social Security Institute (IMSS). Methods: observational, cross-sectional, and descriptive to 47 physicians (34 family physicians and 13 general practitioners) assigned to the Family Medicine Unit no. 94 from November to December 2015; a validated instrument for the evaluation of the clinical ability of preeclampsia-eclampsia in primary care was used. This consisted of 109 false and true statements, of which 54 were true and 55 false. The ability was catalogued according to the numbers of correct answers in very high (93-109), high (75-92), average (57-74), low (39-56), very low (21-38) and to the random (0-20). Through descriptive statistics the clinical ability of the family physicians were compared with the general practitioners. Results: family physicians (72.3% of the participants) obtained 9% in random category, 26% very low and 53% low; general practitioners (27.7%) presented an ability of 31% in random, 23% very low and 31% low. Conclusions: clinical ability of doctors on preeclampsia-eclampsia at the Family Medicine Unit no. 94 is unacceptable, as the low, very low and random were the higher categories; general practitioners obtained a lower percentage in the scores of these categories (85%), in comparison with the specialists (88%). Therefore, family physicians do not have better clinical ability to manage pre-eclampsia than general practitioners.


REFERENCES

  1. Nápoles-Méndez CD. Nuevas interpretaciones en la clasificación y el diagnóstico de la preeclampsia. medisan. 2016;20(4):518-31.

  2. Vargas HVM, Acosta AG, Moreno EMA. La preeclampsia un problema de salud pública mundial. Rev Chil Obstet Ginecol. 2012;77(6):471-6.

  3. Seely EW, Ecker J. Chronic hypertension in pregnancy. Circulation. 2014;129(11):1254-61.

  4. American College of Obstetricians and Gynecologists. Task Force on Hypertension in Pregnancy. Hypertension in Pregnancy. Washington, D.C.: acog: 2013 [Internet]. [Citado 2016 Nov 19]. Disponible en: https://www.acog.org/~/media/Task%20Force%20and%20Work%20Group%20Reports/public/HypertensioninPregnancy.pdf

  5. Pages G, Aller J. Obstetricia Moderna. 3ª ed. México: Interamericana McGraw-Hill; 2007. 372-89.

  6. Scott JR, Gibbs RS. Tratado de Obstetricia y Ginecología Danforth. 9ª ed. México: Interamericana McGraw-Hill; 2007. 190-220.

  7. Organización Mundial de la Salud. Estadísticas Sanitarias Mundiales. Una mina de información sobre salud pública mundial. Ginebra: oms: 2014. [Citado 2016 Nov 19]. Disponible en: http://apps.who.int/iris/bitstream/10665/112817/1/WHO_HIS_HSI_14.1_spa.pdf

  8. Say L, Chou D, Gemmil A, Tuncalp O, Moller AB, Daniels J, et al. Global causes of maternal death: a who systematic analysis. Lancet Glob Healt. 2014;2:e323.333.

  9. Report of the National High Blood Pressure Education Program Working Group on High Blood Pressure in Pregnancy. Am J Obstet Gynecol. 2000;183(1):s1-s22.

  10. Sánchez-Rodríguez EN, Nava-Salazar S, Morán C, Romero-Arauz JF, Cerbón-Cervantes MA. Estado actual de la preeclampsia en México: de lo epidemiológico a sus mecanismos moleculares. Rev Invest Clin. 2010;62(3):525-60.

  11. Norma Oficial Mexicana. nom-007-ssa-1993, Atención de la mujer durante el embarazo, parto y puerperio y del recién nacido.

  12. Detección y Diagnóstico de Enfermedades Hipertensivas del Embarazo. México: Secretaria de Salud; 2010.

  13. Atención integral de la preeclampsia en el segundo y tercer niveles de atención. México: Secretaría de Salud; 2008.

  14. Sibai BM. Treatment of Hypertension in Pregnant Women. N Engl J Med. 1996;335(4):257-65.

  15. Asociación de Médicos del Hospital de Ginecología y Obstetricia. Ginecología y Obstetricia. 3ª ed. México: Méndez Editores; 2002.

  16. Sibai BM. Diagnosis and Management of Gestational Hypertension and Preeclampsia. Obstet & Gynecol. 2003;102(1):181-92.

  17. Peralta-Pedrero ML, Guzmán-Ibarra ML, Cruz-Avelar A, Basalvivazo-Rodríguez MA, Sánchez-Ambriz S, Martínez-García MC. Utilidad para establecer diagnóstico y severidad de los síntomas y signos más frecuentes en la paciente preeclámptica. Gac Méd Méx. 2004;140(5):513-7.

  18. American College of Obstetrician and Gynecologists. acog Practice Bulletin No. 125: Chronic hypertension in pregnancy. Obstet Gynecol. 2012;119(2):396-407.

  19. Pineda AV, Espinosa AP. Evaluación de la competencia clínica en atención prenatal de médicos familiares del primer nivel de atención. En: Memorias de la viii Reunión de Investigación en Salud Región La Raza. México: imss; 2002. 38.

  20. Pérez-Cervantes A, García-Hernández M. Aptitud clínica de los médicos familiares en la preeclampsia-eclampsia. Rev Med Inst Mex Seguro Soc. 2006;44(2):39-44.

  21. Gómez-López VM, Ramírez-Martínez J, García-Ruiz ME, Lee-Santos I, Fong-Jaramillo G, Barrientos-Guerrero. Preeclampsia-eclampsia: aptitud clínica en atención primaria. Rev Invest Clin. 2008;60(2):115-23.




2020     |     www.medigraphic.com