Ugarte MD, Miñoso AY, González FY

Language: Spanish
References: 15
Page: 263-275
PDF size: 182.01 Kb.

ABSTRACT

The American School of Radiology, the Report of Breast Images and System of Data (BI-RADS) published on 2013 the fifth edition of the BI-RADS whose main objectives remained the same. These modifications provide clarity on the terminology used for the breast research, introducing new concepts and removing others aside the language, the edition also provides a guide in the use of the pursuit of the BI-RADS, explaning of the categories of valuation, how and in what circumstances they should be used. Motivated by the topic we gave ourselves the task of reviewing the modifications of the BI-RADS on its fifth edition.

REFERENCES

1. D’Orsi CJ, Mendelson EB, Ikeda DM, et al. Breast imaging reporting and data system: ACR BIRADS – breast imaging atlas. Reston (VA): American College of Radiology. 2003.

2. Destaunis SV, Sickles EA, Mendelson EB, et al. BIRADS Update and challenge (an interactive session). Refresher Course the 99th Annual Meeting of the Radiological Society of North America, RSNA. Chicago, December 4, 2013.

3. Hansen B. Inside the New BI-RADS. ACR Bulletin. 2011;66(6):22.

4. Torres-Tabanera M, Cárdenas-Rebollo JM, Villar-Castaño P, et al. Analysis of the positive predictive value of the subcategories of BI-RAD 4 lesions: preliminary results in 880 lesions. Radiología. 2012; 54(6):520–31.

5. Edwards SD, Lipson JA, Ikeda DM, et al. Updates and revisions to the BI-RADS magnetic resonance imaging lexicon. Magn Reson Imaging Clin N Am. 2013; 21:483–93.

6. Available at: http://www.auntminnieeurope.com/ index.aspx?sec=sup&sub=wom&pag=dis&Item ID5605318. Accessed December 27, 2012. 6. Uematsu T, Kasami M. High-spatial-resolution 3-T breast MRI of nonmasslike enhancement lesions: an analysis of their features as significant predictorsof malignancy. AJR Am J Roentgenol. 2012;198(5):1223-30.

7. Tozaki M, Fukuda K. High-spatial-resolution MRI of non-masslike breast lesions: interpretation model based on BI-RADS MRI descriptors. AJR Am J Roentgenol. 2006;187(2):330-7.

8. Ruano-Ravina A, Cantero P, Urien AE. Efficacy and safety of intraoperative radiotherapy en breast cancer. JANO. 2011;313(1):15-25.

9. Wei Y, Zhi L, Shang Zh, Quing-Long K, Han G, Lian-Dong W, et al. Intraopeorative radiation therapy delivered prior to lumpectomy for early stage breast cancer a single institution study. Am J Cancer. 2015;5(7):2249-57.

10. Kuhl CK, Klaschik S, Mielcarek P, et al. Do T2- weighted pulse sequences help with the differential diagnosis of enhancing lesions in dynamic breast MRI? J Magn Reson Imaging. 1999;9:187-96.

11. Ballesio L, Savelli S, Angeletti M, et al. Breast MRI: are T2 IR sequences useful in the evaluation of breast lesions? Eur J Radiol. 2009;71:96-101.

12. Carney PA, Sickles EA, Monsees BS, et al. Identifying minimally acceptable interpretive performance criterio for diagnostic mammography. Radiology. 2010; 255(2):354-61.

13. Smith-Bindman R, Chu PW, Miglioretti DL, et al. Comparison of diagnostic mammography in the United States and the United Kingdom. JAMA. 2003;290(16):2129-37.

14. Leung JW, Sickles EA. The probably benign assessment. Radiol Clinic North Am. 2007;45(5):773-89.

15. GruberR, Jaromi S, RudasM, et al. Histologic work-up of non-palpable breast lesions classified as probably benign at initial mammography and/or ultrasound (BI-RADS category 3). Eur J Radiol. 2013;82(3):398-403. Disponible en: URL: http://www.jano.es/noticia-solo-un-1-mujeres-con-14976.