medigraphic.com
ISSN 2992-8036 (Electronic)
ISSN 2306-4102 (Print)
Órgano Oficial del Colegio Mexicano de Ortopedia y Traumatología

2016, Number 2

<< Back Next >>

Acta Ortop Mex 2016; 30 (2)

Cemented stems in revision total knee arthroplasty on patients older than 75 y/o. Clinical and radiological analysis

Baggio L, Gil-González S, Barra-González X, Collado-Saenz F, Cruz-Olive E

Language: Spanish
References: 28
Page: 85-90
PDF size: 187.60 Kb.


ABSTRACT

Background: The purpose of this study was to analyze the clinical and radiological evolution of the total knee revision arthroplasty with cemented stems in patients over 75 years. Material and methods: A retrospective analysis was performed in all the subjects who underwent revision of total knee arthroplasty with cemented stems between 2008 and 2014 in our center. Twenty-seven individuals over 75 years met the inclusion criteria. We assessed the Knee Society Score and range of motion for clinical outcome. We evaluated the implant stability with radiographs through radiolucent lines according to the modified radiological scale of the Knee Society; we registered the complications and prosthetic survival. Results: With an average age of our participants of 82.6 ± 4.4 years and a follow-up of 43 ± 14.4 months, we did not find any mechanical failure of the components. The functional average score was 115 ± 32 in the total KSS, of which 77 ± 17.5 points were in the KSS knee and 42 ± 24 in the KSS function. The average range of motion was 98ş ± 17. Radiologically, 18 patients presented radiolucent lines, but only three needed follow-up using the modified Knee Society radiographic scoring system. Conclusions: The results revealed that cemented stems are a good method for fixation in the revision of total knee arthroplasty in people over 75 years. We observed acceptable medium-term clinical results with a low risk of radiological failure, despite the high number of radiolucencies.


REFERENCES

  1. Kurtz S, Ong K, Lau E, Mowat F, Halpern M: Projections of primary and revision hip and knee arthroplasty in the United States from 2005 to 2030. J Bone Joint Surg Am. 2007; 89: 780-5.

  2. Bozic KJ1, Kurtz SM, Lau E, Ong K, Chiu V, Vail TP, et al: The epidemiology of revision total knee arthroplasty in the United States. Clin Orthop Relat Res. 2010; 468(1): 45-51.

  3. Bourne RB, Finlay JB: The influence of tibial component intramedullary stems and implant-cortex contact on the strain distribution of the proximal tibia following total knee arthroplasty. An in vitro study. Clin Orthop Relat Res. 1986; (208): 95-99.

  4. Brooks PJ, Walker PS, Scott RD: Tibial component fixation in deficient tibial bone stock. Clin Orthop Relat Res. 1984; (184): 302-308.

  5. Jazrawi LM, Bai B, Kummer FJ, Hiebert R, Stuchin SA: The effect of stem modularity and mode of fixation on tibial component stability in revision total knee arthroplasty. J Arthroplasty. 2001; 16(6): 759-67.

  6. Nelson CL, Lonner JH, Rand JA, Lotke PA: Strategies of item fixation and the role of supplemental bone graft in revision total knee arthroplasty. J Bone Joint Surg Am. 2003; 85(Supl I): S52-7.

  7. Fehring TK, Odum S, Olekson C, Griffin WL, Mason JB, McCoy TH. Stem fixation in revision total knee arthroplasty: a comparative analysis. Clin Orthop Relat Res. 2003; (416): 217-24.

  8. Mabry TM, Hanssen AD. The role of stems and augments for bone loss in revision knee arthroplasty. J Arthroplasty. 2007; 22: 56-60.

  9. Peters CL, Erickson J, Kloepper RG, Mohr RA: Revision total knee arthroplasty with modular components inserted with metaphyseal cement and stems without cement. J Arthroplasty. 2005; 20: 302-8.

  10. Van Loon CJ, Kyriazopoulos A, Verdonschot N, de Waal Malefijt MC, Huiskes R, Buma P: The role of femoral stem extension in total knee arthroplasty. Clin Orthop Relat Res. 2000; (378): 282-9.

  11. Whaley AL, Trousdale RT, Rand JA, Hanssen AD: Cemented long-stem revision total knee arthroplasty. J Arthroplasty. 2003; 18: 592-9.

  12. Mullaji A, Shetty GM: Cemented stems: a requisite in revision total knee replacement. Bone Joint J. 2014; 96-B: 115-7.

  13. Morgan-Jones R, Oussedik SI, Graichen H, Haddad FS: Zonal fixation in revision total knee arthroplasty. Bone Joint J. 2015; 97-B: 147-9.

  14. McCalden RW, Robert CE, Howard JL, Naudie DD, McAuley JP, MacDonald SJ: Comparison of outcomes and survivorship between patients of different age groups following TKA. J Arthroplasty. 2013; 28(8 Suppl): 83-6.

  15. Peters CL, Erickson JA, Gililland JM: Clinical and radiographic results of 184 consecutive revision total knee arthroplasties placed with modular cementless stems. J Arthroplasty. 2009; 24: 48-53.

  16. Sah AP, Shukla S, Della Valle CJ, Rosenberg AG, Paprosky WG: Modified hybrid stem fixation in revision TKA is durable at 2 to 10 years. Clin Orthop Relat Res. 2011; 469: 839-46.

  17. Barrack RL, Rorabeck C, Burt M, Sawhney J: Pain at the end of the stem after revision total knee arthroplasty. Clin Orthop Relat Res. 1999; (367): 216-25.

  18. Barrack RL, Stanley T, Burt M, Hopkins S: The effect of stem design on end 403 of-stem pain in revision total knee arthroplasty. J Arthroplasty. 2004; 19: 119-24.

  19. Rorabeck CH, Taylor JW: Classification of periprosthetic fractures complicating total knee arthroplasty. Orthop Clinics North Am. 1999; 30(2): 209-14.

  20. Insall JN, Dorr LD, Scott RD, Scott WN: Rationale of the Knee Society clinical rating system. Clin Orthop Relat Res. 1989; (248): 13-4.

  21. Seral B, Seral F, Martin G, de Mora MC: Vástagos cementados en recambios de prótesis totales de rodilla. Rev Ortop Traumatol. 2005; 49: 358-63.

  22. Murray PB, Rand JA, Hanssen AD: Cemented long-stem revision total knee arthroplasty. Clin Orthop Relat Res. 1994; (309): 116-23.

  23. Mabry TM, Vessely MB, Schleck CD, Harmsen WS, Berry DJ: Revision total knee arthroplasty with modular cemented stems: long-term follow-up. J Arthroplasty. 2007; 22: 100-5.

  24. Whaley AL, Trousdale RT, Rand JA, Hanssen AD: Cemented long-stem revision total knee arthroplasty. J Arthroplasty. 2003; 18: 592-9.

  25. Gofton WT, Tsigaras H, Butler RA, Patterson JJ, Barrack RL, Rorabeck CH: Revision total knee arthroplasty: fixation with modular stems. Clin Orthop Relat Res. 2002; 404: 158-68.

  26. Peters CL, Hennessey R, Barden RM, Galante JO, Rosenberg AG: Revision total knee arthroplasty with a cemented posterior stabilized or constrained condylar prosthesis: a minimum 3-year and average 5-year follow-up study. J Arthroplasty. 1997; 12: 896-903.

  27. Kim YH, Kim JS: Revision total knee arthroplasty with use of a constrained condylar knee prosthesis. J Bone Joint Surg Am. 2009; 91: 1440-7.

  28. Beckmann J, Lüring C, Springorum R, Köck FX, Grifka J, Tingart M. Fixation of revision TKA: a review of the literature. Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc. 2011; 19: 872-9.




2020     |     www.medigraphic.com