medigraphic.com
ISSN 1659-1046 (Print)
Odovtos - International Journal of Dental Sciences

2016, Number 1

<< Back Next >>

Odovtos-Int J Dent Sc 2016; 18 (1)

Influence of Irrigating Solutions on Push-Out Bond Strenght of Intraradicular Posts to Dentine

Kaif M, Bissu R

Language: English
References: 21
Page: 73-81
PDF size: 540.80 Kb.


ABSTRACT

The aim of this study was to evaluate the influence of irrigating solutions commonly used during endodontic treatment on the push-out bond strength of intrarradicular fiber posts to dentin. Thirty single rooted teeth were divided into 3 groups according to the solution used during instrumentation: G1, NaOCL 5.25%; G2, 2% chlorhexidine; G3, distilled water. The root canals were prepared and obturated, and the glass fiber posts were cemented with RelyX ARC®. The specimens were submitted to push-out bond test and the results were analyzed by using the One-way ANOVA. The failure mode data were analyzed using the Chi-square test (P ‹ 0.05). There were no statistically significant differences regarding the irrigant solution factor (P › 0.50). The most predominant failure mode was between posts and resin cement. It was concluded that the different irrigant solutions commonly used in endodontic treatment did not affect the push-out bond strength of fiber posts cemented with resin cement.


REFERENCES

  1. Al-Omiri M. K., Mahmoud A. A., Rayyan M. R., Abu-Hammad O. Fracture resistance of teeth restored with post-retained restorations: An overview. J Endod. 2010;36:1439–49.

  2. Demiryürek E. O., Külünk S, Saraç D., Yüksel G., Bulucu B. Effect of different surface treatments on the push-out bond strength of fiber post to root canal dentin. Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol Oral Radiol Endod. 2009;108:e74–80.

  3. Cagidiaco, M.C., Goraci, C., García-Godoy, F. y Ferrari, M. Clinical studies of fiber posts: a literatura review. Int J Prosthodont, 21 (4), 2008: 328-336.

  4. Ferrari, M. Fiber posts and Endodontically treated teeth: A compedium of scientific and clinical perspectives. Modern Dentistry Media. Europe. 2008.

  5. Toman M., Toksavul S., Sarikanat M., Firidinoğlu K., Akin A. The evaluation of displacement resistance of glass FRC posts to root dentine using a thin slice push-out test. Int Endod J. 2009;42:802–10.

  6. Goracci C., Tavares A. U., Fabianelli A., Monticelli F., Raffaelli O., Cardoso P. C., et al. The adhesion between fiber posts and root canal walls: Comparison between microtensile and push-out bond strength measurements. Eur J Oral Sci. 2004;112:353–61.

  7. Bouillaguet S., Troesch S., Wataha J. C., Krejci I., Meyer J. M., Pashley D. H. Microtensile bond strength between adhesive cements and root canal dentin. Dent Mater. 2003;19:199–205.

  8. Jha Padmanabh, Jha Mesha. Retention of fiber posts in different dentin regions: An in vitro study. Indian J Dent Res 2012;23:337-40.

  9. Mathias P., Muniz L. The influence of sodium hypochlorite and root canal sealers on post retention in different dentin regions. OperDent 2005;30:533-9.

  10. Lindblad R. M., Lassila L. V., Salo V., Vallittu P. K., Tjäderhane L. Effect of chlorhexidine on initial adhesion of fiber-reinforced post to root canal. J Dent. 2010;38:796–801.

  11. Ari H., Yasar E., Belli S. Effects of NaOCL on bond strenght of resin cements to root canal dentin. J Endod 2003; 29:248-251.

  12. .Poggio C., Chiesa M., Lombardini M., Dagna A. Influence of ethanol drying on the bond between fiber posts and root canals: SEM analysis. Quintessence Int. 2011;42:e15–21.

  13. Akkayan B., Gulmez T. Resistance to fracture of endodon- tically treated teeth restored with different post systems. J Prosthet Dent 2002;87(4):431-7.

  14. Ferrari M., Mannocci F., Vichi A., Cagidiaco M. C., Mjor I. A. Bonding to root canal: structural characteristic of the substrate. Am J Dent 2000; 13:255-260.

  15. Saleh A. A., Ettman W. M. Effect of endodontic irrigationsolution on microhardness of root canal dentine. J Dent 1999;27:43-46.

  16. Morris M. D., Lee K. W., Agee K. A., Bouillaguet S, Pashley DH. Effects of sodium hypochlorite and RC-Prep on bond strenghts of resin cement to endodontic surfaces. J Endod 2001;27:753-757.

  17. Ari H., Erdemir A., Belli S. Evaluation of the effect of enodontic irrigating solutions on the microhardness and the roughness of root canal dentin. J Endod 2004;30:792-795.

  18. Oncag O., Hosgor M., Hilmioglu S., Zekioglu O., Eronat C. et al. Comparison of antibacterial, bond and toxic effects of various root canal irrigants. Int Endod J 2003;36:423-432.

  19. Alfredo E., de Souza E. S., Marchesan M. A., Paulino S. M., Gariba-Silva R., Sousa-Neto MD.Effect of Eugenol-Based Endodontic Cement on the Adhesion of Intraradicular Posts. Braz Dent J 2006;17:130-3.

  20. Sauro S., Toledano M., Aguilera F. S., Mannocci F., Pashley D. H., Tay F. R., et al. Resin-dentin bonds to EDTA-treated vs. acidetched dentin using ethanol wet-bonding. Part II: Effects of mechanical cycling load on microtensile bond strengths. Dent Mater. 2011;27:563–72.

  21. Osorio R., Erhardt M. C., Pimenta L. A., Osorio E., Toledano M. EDTA treatment improves resin-dentin bonds’ resistance to degradation. J Dent Res. 2005;84:736–40.




2020     |     www.medigraphic.com