medigraphic.com
ISSN 2395-9215 (Print)
Órgano Oficial de Difusión de la Facultad de Odontología de la UNAM

2016, Number 3

<< Back Next >>

Rev Mex Ortodon 2016; 4 (3)

Maxillary protraction through skeletal anchorage in growing patients. Literature review

Huízar GIG, García LE

Language: Spanish
References: 12
Page: 155-158
PDF size: 257.65 Kb.


ABSTRACT

Early treatment of skeletal Class III patients is usually handled with the use of maxillary protraction face mask. The results of this orthopedic therapy are often accompanied by adverse dentoalveolar effects. An alternative treatment is skeletal anchorage comprised of temporary anchorage devices (TADs), which uses two titanium plates fixed with mini implants placed in the zygomatic process of the maxilla and two side plates between the lower canine and right and left and the use of intermaxillary elastics. This results in maxillary advancement and improvement of facial aesthetics while reducing dentoalveolar adverse effects.


REFERENCES

  1. Enacar A, Giray B, Pehlivanoglu M, Iplikcioglu H. Facemask therapy with rigid anchorage in a patient with maxillary hypoplasia and severe oligodontia. Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop. 2003; 123 (5): 571-577.

  2. Gallagher RW, Miranda F, Buschang PH. Maxillary protraction: treatment and posttreatment effects. Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop. 1998; 113 (6): 612-619.

  3. Westwood PV, McNamara JA Jr, Baccetti T, Franchi L, Sarver DM. Long-term effects of Class III treatment with rapid maxillary expansion and facemask therapy followed by fixed appliances. Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop. 2003; 123: 306-320.

  4. Wells AP, Sarver DM, Proffit WR. Long-term efficacy of reverse pull headgear therapy. Angle Orthod. 2006; 76: 915-922.

  5. Cornelis MA, Scheffler NR, De Clerck HJ, Tulloch JF, Behets CN. Systematic review of the experimental use of temporary skeletal anchorage devices in orthodontics. Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop. 2007; 131: 52-58.

  6. Kokich VG, Shapiro PA, Oswald RJ, Koskinen-Mottelt L, Clarren SK. Ankylosed teeth as abutments for maxillary protraction. A case report. Am J Orthod. 1985; 88: 303-307.

  7. Smalley WM, Shapiro PA, Hohl TH, Kokich VG, Brånemark P. Osseointegrated titanium implants for maxillofacial protraction in monkeys. Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop. 1988; 94: 285-295.

  8. Singer SL, Henry PJ, Rosenberg I. Osseointegrated implants as an adjunct to face mask therapy: a case report. Angle Orthod. 2000; 70: 253-262.

  9. De Clerck HJ, Proffit WR. Growth modification of the face: A current perspective with emphasis on Class III treatment. Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop. 2015; 148 (1): 37-46.

  10. Cornelis MA, Scheffler NR, Mahy P, Siciliano S, De Clerck HJ, Tulloch JF. Modified miniplates for temporary skeletal anchorage in orthodontics: placement and removal surgeries. J Oral Maxillofac Surg. 2008; 66: 1439-1445.

  11. Heymann GC, Cevidanes L, Cornelis M, De Clerck HJ, Tulloch JF. Three-dimensional analysis of maxillary protraction with intermaxillary elastics to miniplates. Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop. 2010; 137 (2): 274-284.

  12. Liu SS, Kyung HM, Buschang PH. Continuous forces are more effective than intermittent forces in expanding sutures. Eur J Orthod. 2010; 32: 371-380.




2020     |     www.medigraphic.com