medigraphic.com
Academia Mexicana de Neurología, A.C.

2005, Number 3

<< Back Next >>

Rev Mex Neuroci 2005; 6 (3)

Facial nervous conduction: relation with the face type

Medrano MJ, Velázquez PLC, Canales ON, Almaguer MLE

Language: Spanish
References: 48
Page: 207-211
PDF size: 100.04 Kb.


ABSTRACT

Introduction: Neurophysiological studies and particularly motor nerve conduction studies are very important because they give us certain diagnostic information of different pathologies including Spinocerebellar Ataxia Type 2, the most frequent form in Cuba and in Holguín, whose prevalence is considered as one of the highest in the world. The purpose of this study is in order to determine the relationship between motor conduction parameters of facial nerve and facial types. Patients and methods: We studied 101 patients with clinical and molecular diagnosis of SCA 2 and 36 presimptomatic relatives. In all cases were made molecular studies, oral exam and face measurements to determing facial type after a previous facial nerve motor conduction study of VII cranial pair. Results: These showed a latency prolongation of the potential in patients and of the duration both in SCA 2 patients as it’s relatives in comparison with healthy subjects and in the asymptomatic bearers as compared to the reference pattern (control group of healthy subjects), and the non-existing relationship between facial type and motor nerve conduction parameters. Conclusions: The facial nerve in SCA 2 patients and their relatives. There’s a positive proof of myelin damage.


REFERENCES

  1. Fernández RP, Smyth E, Figueiras A, Suarez QD. Motivación psicosocial del paciente ortodóncico. Ortodoncia clínica 2001; 4(1): 34-8.

  2. Kurlcandski V. Estomatología Ortopédica. Moscú: Ed. Mir; 1979.

  3. Bueno A. Introdução as Bases Cibernéticas da Ortopedia Dentofacial, 1991.

  4. Bueno A. Crecimiento craniofacial. Uma Interpretação Sistêmica. Rio de Janeiro, 1997.

  5. Mayoral J, Mayoral G. Principios fundamentales y práctica. La Habana: Ed. Científico Técnica; 1986.

  6. Veda HM, Miyamoto K, Saifuddin M, Ishizuka Y, Tanne K. Masticatory muscle activity in children and adults with different facial types. Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop 2000; 118(1): 63-8.

  7. Akkaya S, Haydar S, Bilir E. Effects of spring-loaded posterior bite-block appliance on masticatory muscles. Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop 2000; 118(2): 179-83.

  8. Watanabe K. The relationship between dentofacial morphology and the isometric jaw opening and closing muscle function as evaluated by electromyography. J Oral Rehabil 2000; 27(7): 639-45.

  9. Benington PC, Gardener JE, Hunt NP. Masseter muscle volume measured using ultrasonography and its relationship with facial morphology. Eur J Orthod 1999; 21(6): 659-70.

  10. Raadsheer MC, van Eijden TM, van Ginkel FC, Prahl-Andersen R. Contribution of jaw muscle size and craniofacial morphology to human bite force magnitude. J Dent Res 1999; 76(1): 31-42.

  11. Kubota M, Nakano H, Sanjo I, Satch K, Sanjo T, Kamecai T, et al. Maxilofacial morphology and masseter muscle thickness in adults. Eur J Orthod 1998; 20(5): 535-42.

  12. Raadsheer MC, Killardis O, van Eijden TM, van Ginkel FC, Prahl-Andersen R. Masseter muscle tickness in growing individuals and its relation to facial morphology. Arch Oral Biol 1996; 41(4): 323-32.

  13. Velázquez PL, Santos FN, García R, Paneque HM, Hechevarrias PR. Epidemiología de la ataxia cubana. Rev Neurol 2001; 32 (7): 606-11.

  14. Velázquez L, Medina EE. Características electrofisiológicas en familiares asintomáticos de enfermos con Ataxia Espinocerebelosa tipo 2. Rev Neurol 1998; 27(160): 1-9.

  15. Velázquez Pérez L, Medina HE. Evaluación neurofisioló-gica en pacientes afectados por Ataxia Espinocerebelosa tipo 2. Rev Neurol 1998; 27(100): 921-6.

  16. Velázquez Pérez L, de la Hoz OJ, Pérez GR, Echevarría PR, Herrera DH. Evaluación cuantitativa de los trastornos de la coordinación en pacientes con Ataxia Espinocerebelosa tipo 2 cubana. Rev Neurol 2001; 32(7): 601-6.

  17. Kimura J. Electrodiagnosis in Diseases of Nerve and Muscle: principles and practice. Philadelphia: Ed. F.A. Davis Company; 1989.

  18. Santos AC. El abecé de la electroneuromiografía clínica. La Habana: Ed. Ciencias Médicas; 2003.

  19. Velázquez PL, Orozco DG. Ataxia cerebelosa cubana. Estudios de conducción de nervios periféricos en pacientes y familiares asintomáticos. Medicina 1999; 59(1): 63-6.

  20. Di Bella P, Logullo F, Lagalla G, Sirolla C, Provinciali L. Reproducibility of normal facial nerve conduction studies and their relevance in the electrophysiological assessment of peripheral facial paralysis. Neurophisiol Clin 1997; 27(4): 300-8.

  21. Amyotrophic Lateral Sclerosis. Employing Electrophisiological Studies in the Diagnosis of ALS. http://www.wtrials.org/index.html

  22. Triantafyllou N, Rumbos A, Athanosopoulou H, Siafaka A, Loulakaki SM. Electrophysiological study (EEG, VEPs, BAEPs) in patient with Charcot-Marie Toot (type HMSNI) disease. Electromyogr Clin Neurophysiol 1989; 29(5): 259-63.

  23. DeRubels DA, Woulfe J, Rosso D, Lownie S, Parnes L, Lee D, et al. Left Facial Weakness. http://www.google.com.cu

  24. Teixeira KPA, Lima RLA, de Lima CHA, Antunes BA. BLINK REFLEX. Comparison of latency measurements in different human races. Arq Neuro-Psiquiatr 2002; 60(3).

  25. Fernández RP, Smyth E, Figueiras A, Suarez QD. Motivación psicosocial del paciente ortodóncico. Ortodoncia clínica 2001; 4(1): 34-8.

  26. Kurlcandski V. Estomatología Ortopédica. Moscú: Ed. Mir; 1979.

  27. Bueno A. Introdução as Bases Cibernéticas da Ortopedia Dentofacial, 1991.

  28. Bueno A. Crecimiento craniofacial. Uma Interpretação Sistêmica. Rio de Janeiro, 1997.

  29. Mayoral J, Mayoral G. Principios fundamentales y práctica. La Habana: Ed. Científico Técnica; 1986.

  30. Veda HM, Miyamoto K, Saifuddin M, Ishizuka Y, Tanne K. Masticatory muscle activity in children and adults with different facial types. Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop 2000; 118(1): 63-8.

  31. Akkaya S, Haydar S, Bilir E. Effects of spring-loaded posterior bite-block appliance on masticatory muscles. Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop 2000; 118(2): 179-83.

  32. Watanabe K. The relationship between dentofacial morphology and the isometric jaw opening and closing muscle function as evaluated by electromyography. J Oral Rehabil 2000; 27(7): 639-45.

  33. Benington PC, Gardener JE, Hunt NP. Masseter muscle volume measured using ultrasonography and its relationship with facial morphology. Eur J Orthod 1999; 21(6): 659-70.

  34. Raadsheer MC, van Eijden TM, van Ginkel FC, Prahl-Andersen R. Contribution of jaw muscle size and craniofacial morphology to human bite force magnitude. J Dent Res 1999; 76(1): 31-42.

  35. Kubota M, Nakano H, Sanjo I, Satch K, Sanjo T, Kamecai T, et al. Maxilofacial morphology and masseter muscle thickness in adults. Eur J Orthod 1998; 20(5): 535-42.

  36. Raadsheer MC, Killardis O, van Eijden TM, van Ginkel FC, Prahl-Andersen R. Masseter muscle tickness in growing individuals and its relation to facial morphology. Arch Oral Biol 1996; 41(4): 323-32.

  37. Velázquez PL, Santos FN, García R, Paneque HM, Hechevarrias PR. Epidemiología de la ataxia cubana. Rev Neurol 2001; 32 (7): 606-11.

  38. Velázquez L, Medina EE. Características electrofisiológicas en familiares asintomáticos de enfermos con Ataxia Espinocerebelosa tipo 2. Rev Neurol 1998; 27(160): 1-9.

  39. Velázquez Pérez L, Medina HE. Evaluación neurofisioló-gica en pacientes afectados por Ataxia Espinocerebelosa tipo 2. Rev Neurol 1998; 27(100): 921-6.

  40. Velázquez Pérez L, de la Hoz OJ, Pérez GR, Echevarría PR, Herrera DH. Evaluación cuantitativa de los trastornos de la coordinación en pacientes con Ataxia Espinocerebelosa tipo 2 cubana. Rev Neurol 2001; 32(7): 601-6.

  41. Kimura J. Electrodiagnosis in Diseases of Nerve and Muscle: principles and practice. Philadelphia: Ed. F.A. Davis Company; 1989.

  42. Santos AC. El abecé de la electroneuromiografía clínica. La Habana: Ed. Ciencias Médicas; 2003.

  43. Velázquez PL, Orozco DG. Ataxia cerebelosa cubana. Estudios de conducción de nervios periféricos en pacientes y familiares asintomáticos. Medicina 1999; 59(1): 63-6.

  44. Di Bella P, Logullo F, Lagalla G, Sirolla C, Provinciali L. Reproducibility of normal facial nerve conduction studies and their relevance in the electrophysiological assessment of peripheral facial paralysis. Neurophisiol Clin 1997; 27(4): 300-8.

  45. Amyotrophic Lateral Sclerosis. Employing Electrophisiological Studies in the Diagnosis of ALS. http://www.wtrials.org/index.html

  46. Triantafyllou N, Rumbos A, Athanosopoulou H, Siafaka A, Loulakaki SM. Electrophysiological study (EEG, VEPs, BAEPs) in patient with Charcot-Marie Toot (type HMSNI) disease. Electromyogr Clin Neurophysiol 1989; 29(5): 259-63.

  47. DeRubels DA, Woulfe J, Rosso D, Lownie S, Parnes L, Lee D, et al. Left Facial Weakness. http://www.google.com.cu

  48. Teixeira KPA, Lima RLA, de Lima CHA, Antunes BA. BLINK REFLEX. Comparison of latency measurements in different human races. Arq Neuro-Psiquiatr 2002; 60(3).




2020     |     www.medigraphic.com