medigraphic.com
ISSN 0185-3252 (Print)
Revista de la Asociación Médica del Centro Médico ABC

2016, Number 2

<< Back Next >>

An Med Asoc Med Hosp ABC 2016; 61 (2)

Results of early diagnosis of deafness in newborns without risk factors

Carranza ACA, Toral MR, Shkurovich BP, Schabes RM

Language: Spanish
References: 32
Page: 93-97
PDF size: 198.72 Kb.


ABSTRACT

Background: Congenital hearing loss is common at birth. In Mexico, it is estimated that around 10 million people have some type or degree of hearing problem. Objective: To know the result of the early diagnosis of deafness in newborns without risk factors at the ABC Medical Center. Methods: Observational, descriptive, retrospective and cross-sectional study. We collected data, such as sex, number of studies in the nursery, subsequent studies and altered ear(s) between 2007 and 2013, by recording the outcomes of the neonatal hearing screening by studying OAE and the registration of subsequent studies. Statistical analysis was calculated using absolute and relative frequencies; SPSS v16.0 was used. Results: Of 7,418 infants studied, 97% had normal hearing, in 2.9%, the consecutive test was not performed as they were absent to the study date (we ignore the reason), 0.1% had hearing loss, of which 0.06% had audiometric anacusis, and 0.04% had medium hearing loss. Conclusions: Early detection of deafness in newborns without risk factors at the ABC Medical Center is performed routinely. Eight newborns with no risk factors were diagnosed with hearing loss-deafness; the male gender and alteration of both ears predominated.


REFERENCES

  1. Fontané J. Déficit auditivo. Retraso en el habla de origen audígeno. Rev Neurol. 2005; 41 (Supl 1): S25-S37.

  2. Otvagin IV. Epidemiological aspects of hearing disorders in working population in the central Federal District. Vest Otorinolaringol. 2004; 5: 33-35.

  3. Chávez ME, Álvarez Y, De la Rosa A, Virgen M, Castro S. Déficit auditivo en pacientes atendidos en otorrinolaringología del IMSS en Guadalajara. Rev Med Inst Mex Seguro Soc. 2008; 46 (3): 315-322.

  4. INEGI (2003) Datos sociales demográficos y educacionales. México. [Consultado: 26/01/15]. Disponible en: www.inegi.gob.mx

  5. Parving A, Stephens D. Profound permanent hearing impairment in childhood: causative factors in two European countries. Acta Otolaryngol. 1997; 117 (2): 158-160.

  6. No authors listed. Joint Committee on Infant Hearing 1994 Position Statement. American Academy of Pediatrics Joint Committee on Infant Hearing. Pediatrics. 1995; 95 (1): 152.

  7. Comisión para la Detección Precoz de la Hipoacusia. Detección Precoz de la Sordera. Dossier Informativo. [Consultado: 30/01/2015]. Disponible en: http://www.msal.gob.ar/images/stories/bes/graficos/0000000232cnt-detecprecoz.pdf

  8. CENETEC. Implantes Cocleares, Gaceta. 2.ª época. 2009; 1 (1). [Consultado: 05/03/2015]. Disponible en: http://www.cenetec.gob.mx/interior/gaceta2_1_1/sumario.html

  9. Dunmade AO, Dunmade AD, Taiwo OA, Tomori AR, Komolafe TM. A software system for diagnosis and classification of deafness. European J Scientific Research. 2009; 25 (4): 597-605.

  10. No authors listed. National Institutes of Health Consensus Development Conference Statement. Early identification of hearing impairment in infants and young children. Int J Pediatr Otorhinolaryngol. 1993; 27 (3): 215-227.

  11. Yoon PJ, Price M, Gallagher K, Fleisher BE, Messner AH. The need for long-term audiologic follow-up of neonatal intensive care unit (NICU) graduates. Int J Pediatr Otorhinolaryngol. 2003; 67 (4): 353-357.

  12. Secretaría de Salud. Guía de práctica clínica. Hipoacusia neurosensorial bilateral e implante coclear. [Consultado: 01/02/15]. Disponible en: http://www.cenetec.salud.gob.mx/descargas/gpc/CatalogoMaestro/396_IMSS_10_hipoacusia_neurosensorial/EyR_IMSS_396_10.pdf

  13. Martínez CG, Valdez GM. Detección oportuna de la hipoacusia en el niño. Acta Pediatr Mex. 2003; 24 (3): 176-180.

  14. Programa de Acción Específico 2007-2012. Tamiz auditivo neonatal e intervención temprana. México, DF. [Consultado: 02/02/15]. Disponible en: http://www.anmm.org.mx/publicaciones/CAnivANM150/L13-Tamiz-auditivo-neonatal.pdf

  15. National Institutes of Health. Early identification of hearing impairment in infants and young children. [Consultado: 12/03/15]. Disponible en: https://consensus.nih.gov/1993/1993hearinginfantschildren092html.htm

  16. Ling HC, Schu MT, Lee KS, Ho GM, Fu TY, Bruna S et al. Comparison of hearing screening programs between one step with transient evoked otoacustic emissions (TEOAE) and two steps with TEOAE and automated auditory brainstem response. Laryngoscope. 2005; 115 (11): 1957-1962.

  17. Wrightson AS. Universal newborn hearing screening. Am Fam Physician. 2007; 75 (9): 1349-1352.

  18. Connolly JL, Carron JD, Roark SD. Universal newborn hearing screening: are we achieving the Joint Committee on Infant Hearing (JCIH) objectives? Laryngoscope. 2005; 115 (2): 232-236.

  19. Toral RM, Collado MA, Shkurovich ZM. Diagnóstico temprano de sordera por emisiones otoacústicas en el recién nacido. An Med Asoc Med Hosp ABC. 1997; 42 (3): 111-113.

  20. Year 2000 position statement: principles and guidelines for early hearing detection and intervention programs. Joint Committee on Infant Hearing, American Academy of Audiology, American Academy of Pediatrics, American Speech-Language-Hearing Association, and Directors of Speech and Hearing Programs in State Health and Welfare Agencies. Pediatrics. 2000; 106 (4): 798-817.

  21. Erenberg A, Lemons J, Sia C, Trunkel D, Ziring P. Newborn and infant hearing loss: detection and intervention. American Academy of Pediatrics. Task Force on Newborn and Infant Hearing, 1998-1999. Pediatrics. 1999; 103 (2): 527-530.

  22. Norma Oficial Mexicana NOM-034-SSA2-2013, Para la prevención y control de los defectos al nacimiento. [Consultado: 12/03/15]. Disponible en: http://dof.gob.mx/nota_detalle.php?codigo=5349816&fecha=24/06/2014

  23. Mehl AL, Thomson V. Newborn hearing screening: the great omission. Pediatrics. 1998; 101 (1): E4.

  24. American Academy of Pediatrics, Join Committee on Infant Hearing. Year 2007 position statement: Principles and guidelines for early hearing detection and intervention programs. Pediatrics. 2007; 120 (4): 898-921.

  25. Hernández HRJ, Hernández ALM, Castillo MN, De la Rosa MN, Martínez EJ, Flores SR et al. Parámetros de normalidad de las emisiones otoacústicas en neonatos. Rev Med Inst Mex Seguro Soc. 2007; 45 (1): 63-68.

  26. Berlanga OM, Sotelo E, Trejo V, Segura M, Gónzalez SE, Rivera P et al. Tamiz auditivo neonatal (Fase I). ¿Son útiles las emisiones otoacústicas en una etapa para detectar hipoacusia en recién nacidos sanos? Evid Med Invest Salud. 2013; 6 (2): 41-46.

  27. Tasci Y, Muderris II, Erkaya S, Altinbas S, Yucel H, Haberal A. Newborn hearing screening programme outcomes in a research hospital from Turkey. Child Care Health Dev. 2009; 36 (3): 317-322.

  28. Gómez PV, Martínez CA, Ochoa BAM, Vásquez C. Prevalencia de hipoacusia y factores de riesgo asociados en recién nacidos del estado de Colima, México. An Orl Mex. 2013; 58 (2): 61-66.

  29. Islas E. Tamiz auditivo neonatal: experiencia en el Hospital General de México [Tesis de posgrado]. México: Universidad Nacional Autónoma de México. Facultad de Medicina; 2010.

  30. González LO, Pérez VM, Ospina JP. Clínica de tamiz auditivo en el Instituto Nacional de Pediatría. Acta Pediatr Mex. 2012; 33 (1): 20-25.

  31. Berninger E, Westling B. Outcome of a universal newborn hearing screening programme based on multiple transient-evoked otoacustic emissions and clinical brainstem response audiometry. Acta Otolaryngol. 2011; 131 (7): 728-739.

  32. Solís AE, Valle M. Detección con emisiones otoacústicas de trastornos de audición en recién nacidos en alto riesgo. An Otorrinolaringol Mex. 2001; 46 (3): 93-96.




2020     |     www.medigraphic.com