2003, Number 4
<< Back Next >>
Rev Mex Cir Endoscop 2003; 4 (4)
Endoscopic treatment of residual choledocholithiasis
Gómez CX, Pérez BB, Rendón CE, López AME, González-Angulo RA, Rodríguez VG, Fernández CE, Zamorano OY, Arizmendi GA
Language: Spanish
References: 22
Page: 178-183
PDF size: 101.00 Kb.
ABSTRACT
Background: Residual choledocholithiasis regard between 5 to 12% of the cholecystectomy. However, surgical exploration of the common bile duct do not exclude the possibility of retained stones. Endoscopic sphincterotomy (ERCP-ES) followed by the removal of stones had showed to be a secure and effective procedure.
Objective: The aims of the study were to report the experience of ERCP-ES in the treatment of residual choledocholithiasis at our hospital.
Material and methods: Retrospective and descriptive studies from March 1996 to September 2003, that included patients that come to the Endoscopy Unit of the General Hospital “Dr. Manuel Gea González” with A) Jaundice postcholecystectomy by retained stones; B) Jaundice between the first two years of cholecystectomy and bile duct surgery and C) Cholangiography by T-tube with residual calculi.
Analyze demographic characteristics, endoscopic approach, number of retained stones, success of the procedure, therapeutic options in difficult stones and complications.
Results: From March 1996 to September 2003 were selected 319 patients with residual choledocholithiasis. Female sex predominated in 81.5%, age average was 42 years with range from 18 to 72 years. The 35% (n = 111) of the cases have T-tube. Combine approach 26% (n = 84), guide cannulation 69% (n = 220), precut papillotomy 4% (n = 13) and unsuccessful cannulation 0.6% (n = 2). Endoscopic sphincterotomy was performance in 99.3% (n = 317). Nineteen patients (6%) required biliary stenting, 2 by impacted stones in left hepatic duct and 17 by large or impacted bile duct stones, that continue treatment with ursodeoxycholic acid and second CPRE in the following 4 or 6 months, with success mechanical lithotripsy in 6 patients and electrohydraulic lithotripsy in 3.
The residual lithiasis was successfully treated in 314 patients (98.4%) and only five (1.5%) needed common bile duct exploration. Eight patients was no serious procedure-related complications, that included 4 self-limited pancreatitis and 4 hemorrhage. There were no mortality.
Conclusion: The endoscopic sphincterotomy for the treatment of residual choledocholithiasis show good results and low morbility. When is not possible to remove it in the first procedure, biliary stenting and stones fragmentation increase the success.
REFERENCES
Uchiyama K, Onishi H, Tani M, Kinoshita H, Kawai M, Ueno M, Yamaue H. Long-term prognosis after treatment of patients with choledocholithiasis. Ann Surg 2003; 238: 97-102.
Saunders KD, Cates JA, Roslyn JJ. Pathogenesis of gallstones. Surg Clin North Am 1990; 100: 500-4.
Stukalov VV. Current approaches to the diagnosis and treatment of residual choledocholithiasis. Vestn Khir Im II Grek 1998; 157: 39-43.
Patel AP, Lokey JS, Harris JB, Sticca RP, McGill ES, Arrillaga A, Miller RS, Kopelman TR. Current management of common bile duct stones in a teaching community hospital. Am Surg 2003; 69: 555-60.
Himal HS. Common bile duct stones: the role of preoperative, intraoperative and postoperative ERCP. Semin Laparosc Surg 2000; 7: 237-45.
Binmoeller KF, Schafer TW. Endoscopic management of bile duct stones. J Clin Gastroenterol 2000; 32: 106-18.
Binmoeller KF, Bruckner M, Thonke F, Soehendra N. Treatment of difficult bile duct stones using mechanical, electrohydraulic and extracorporeal shock wave lithotripsy. Endoscopy 1993; 25: 201-6.
Costamagna G, Tringali A, Shah SK, Mutignani M, Zuccala G, Perri V. Long-term follow-up of patients after endoscopic sphincterotomy for choledocholithiasis, and risk factors for recurrence. Endoscopy 2002; 34: 273-9.
Satín SC, Masri LSSS, Froes ET, Sharma V. Laparoscopic cholecistectomy: laboratory predictors of choledocholithiasis. Am Surg 1994; 60: 767-71.
Classen M, Demling L. Endoscopiche sphincterotimic der papila Vateri. Dtsch Med Wochenschr 1974; 99: 496-501.
Kawai K, Akasaka Y, Mirakamik. Endoscopic sphincterotomy of the ampulla of Vater. Gastrointest Endosc 1974; 20: 148-51.
Sohma S, Matsuda T, Fujita R. Endoscopic papillotomy: a new approach for extraction of residual stone: Gastrointest Endosc 1974; 16: 452-5.
Liberman MA, Phillips EH, Carroll BJ. Cost effective management of complicated choledocholithiasis: laparoscopic transcystic duct exploration or endoscopic sphincterotomy. J Am Coll Surg 1996; 182: 488.
Haber G. Choledocholithiasis. 7th International Symposium on Pancreatic & Biliary Endoscopy. January 20-23, 2000, Torrance, California.
DiSario JA, Freeman ML, Bjorkman DJ, Mac Mathuna P, Petersen B, Sherman S, Lehman G, Carr-Locke DL, Hixson L, Jaffe P, Al-Kawas F, and the EDES Study Group. Endoscopic balloon dilation vs sphincterotomy (EDES) for bile duct stones removal. Digestion 1998; 59(Suppl 3): 26.
Komatsu Y, Kawabe T, Toda N et al. Endoscopic papillary balloon dilation for the management of common bile duct stones: experience of 226 cases. Endoscopy 1998; 30: 12-7.
Bergman JJGHM, Rauws EA, Fockens P. Randomized trial of endoscopic balloon dilation versus endoscopic sphincterotomy for removal of bile duct stones. Lancet 1997; 349: 1124-9.
Cohello R, Bordas JM, Guevara MC, Liach J, Mondelo F, Gines A, Teres J. Mechanical lithotripsy during retrograde cholangiography in choledocholithiasis untreatable by conventional endoscopic sphincterotomy. Gastroenterol Hepatol 1997; 20: 124-7.
Leung JWC, Chung SSC. Electrohydraulic lithotripsy with peroral choledochoscopy. Br Med J 1989; 299: 595-598.
Kubota Y, Takaoka M, Fujimura K. Endoscopic endoprosthesis for large stones in common bile duct. Intern Med 1994; 33: 597-601.
Johnson GK, Geenen JE, Venu RP. Treatment of non-extractable common bile duct stones with combination ursodeoxycholic acid plus endoprosthesis. Gastrointest Endosc 1993; 30: 528-532.
Seitz U, Bapaye A, Bohnacker S, Navarrete C, Maydeo A, Soehendra N. Advances in therapeutic endoscopic treatment of common bile duct stones. World J Surg 1998; 22: 1133-44.