medigraphic.com
ISSN 0185-3252 (Print)
Revista de la Asociación Médica del Centro Médico ABC

2015, Number 4

<< Back Next >>

An Med Asoc Med Hosp ABC 2015; 60 (4)

Resuscitation in septic shock: protocols

Sánchez DJS, Monares ZE, Rodríguez ZC, Díaz EA

Language: Spanish
References: 10
Page: 261-265
PDF size: 263.23 Kb.


ABSTRACT

Introduction: Hemodynamic instability is defined as a shock index (heart rate/systolic) › 0.8, especially against a lactate › 2 mmol/L. 62% of the septic patients have this index › 0.8. Objective: This paper aims to make a narrative review of the literature on resuscitation protocols in septic shock. Method: Two authors (AD, CR) conducted the search in the following databases: PubMed, Ovid, HINARI, Cochrane, with the key words: septic shock, treatment, protocols. Two authors (SS, MS) selected abstracts for examination in full text and making the first summary. The final text was reviewed by the four authors. Results: A total of 117 articles which were examined in summary form; in the second review, 80 articles were selected in complete format for this work. The final bibliography is limited to articles representative of the concepts outlined. Conclusions: Adequate resuscitation of septic shock is the correct maneuver performed at the right time. The steps of resuscitation are save, optimize, endure and deescalate. Resuscitation must be guided by objectives and these must meet a specific goal.


REFERENCES

  1. Dellinger RP, Levy MM, Rhodes A, Annane D, Gerlach H, Opal SM et al. Surviving sepsis campaign: international guidelines for management of severe sepsis and septic shock, 2012. Int Care Med. 2013; 39: 165-228.

  2. Vincent JL, De Backer D. Circulatory shock. N Engl J Med. 2013; 369: 1726-1734.

  3. ProCESS Investigators, Yealy DM, Kellum JA, Huang DT, Barnato AE et al. A randomized trial of protocol-based care for early septic shock. N Engl J Med. 2014; 370: 1683-1693.

  4. Ferrer R, Martin-Loeches I, Phillips G et al. Empiric antibiotic treatment reduces mortality in severe sepsis and septic shock from the first hour: results from a guideline-based performance improvement program. Crit Care Med. 2014; 42: 1749-1755.

  5. Marik PE. Surviving sepsis: going beyond the guidelines. Ann Intensive Care. 2011; 1 (1): 17.

  6. Azuhata T, Kinoshita K, Kawano D, Komatsu T, Sakurai A, Chiba Y et al. Time from admission to initiation of surgery for source control is a critical determinant of survival in patients with gastrointestinal perforation with associated septic shock. Crit Care. 2014; 18: R87.

  7. Boyd JH, Forbes J, Nakada TA, Walley KR, Russell JA. Fluid resuscitation in septic shock: a positive fluid balance and elevated central venous pressure are associated with increased mortality. Crit Care Med. 2011; 39 (2): 259-265.

  8. Garnacho J, Gutiérrez A, Escoresca A, Corcia Y, Fernández E, Herrera I et al. De-escalation of empirical therapy is associated with lower mortality in patients with severe sepsis and septic shock. Intensive Care Med. 2014; 40 (1): 32-40.

  9. Gattinoni L, Brazzi L, Pelosi P, Latini R, Tognoni G, Pesenti A et al. A trial of goal-oriented hemodynamic therapy in critically ill patients. SvO2 Collaborative Group. N Engl J Med. 1995; 333: 1025-1032.

  10. International Study on Microcirculatory Shock Occurrence in Acutely Ill Patients. [Accessed 13/10/2014]. Available in: http://www.hindawi.com/journals/ccrp/2012/121752/




2020     |     www.medigraphic.com