medigraphic.com
Federación Mexicana de Ginecología y Obstetricia, A.C.

2005, Number 02

<< Back Next >>

Ginecol Obstet Mex 2005; 73 (02)

Analysis of results of intrauterine insemination performed once or twice per stimulated cycle

Ruiz AJ, Anta JE, Durán ML, Kably AA

Language: Spanish
References: 14
Page: 76-82
PDF size: 75.82 Kb.


ABSTRACT

Objective: To compare double homologous versus only one intrauterine insemination (IUI) by stimulated cycle.
Patients and method: In a prospective, comparative study 138 patients were included, who underwent to intrauterine insemination; not inclusion parameters were: patients with cancelled cycles by poor response or by ovarian hyperestimulation syndrome risk. Patients were divided in two groups: Group 1 (N = 69) one insemination at 36 hours after human gonadotrophin chorionic hormone (hCG) and group 2 (N = 69) two inseminations 24 and 48 hours after hCG. Sperm separation was done with swim up, wash and resuspended or isolate techiques, and ovarian stimulation was done with recombinant FSH, menotrophins or clomiphene citrate. Statistical analysis was made by T Student and χ2 tests. Results: The overall pregnancy rate was 13.04% per cycle; and seminal characteristics after seminal preparation were similar. We observed better pregnancy rates in the patients with ovulatory dysfunction and endometriosis (14.9% and 18.2%). No differences were established in pregnancy rates when patients were compared in function to seminal preparation. Conclusions: Double IUI at 24 and 48 hours after hCG has the same results in pregnancy rates than only one IUI correctly indicated 36 hours after hCG, but the costs increases in double insemination.


REFERENCES

  1. Requena A, Martínez J, Párraga M, Isaza V, Landazábal A, Villasante A y col. Inseminación artificial. En: Remohi J, Pellicer A, Simón C, Navarro J, editores. Reproducción Humana. 2ª ed. Madrid: McGraw-Hill, 2002;pp:263-72.

  2. Zayed F, Lenton EA, Cooke ID. Comparison between stimulated in vitro fertilization and stimulated insemination for the treatment of unexplained and mild factor infertility. Hum Reprod 1997;12:2408-13.

  3. Haney AF. Controlled ovarian hyperstimulation and intrauterine insemination. In: Keye WR, Chang RJ, Rebar RW, Soules MR, editors. Infertility evaluation and treatment. 1st ed. Atlanta: WB Saunders Co., 1995;pp:745-58.

  4. Guzick DS, Carson SA, Coutfics C. Efficacy of superovulation and intrauterine insemination in the treatment of Infertility National Cooperative Reproductive Medicine Network. N Engl J Med 1999;340:177-83.

  5. Hughes EG. The effectiveness of ovulation induction and intrauterine insemination in the treatment of persistent infertility: a metaanalysis. Hum Reprod 1997;12:1865-72.

  6. OWH. Temporal relationships between ovulation and defined changes in the concentrations of plasma estradiol-17 beta, luteinizing hormone, follicle stimulating hormone and progesterone. Am J Obstet Gynecol 1980;45:383-40.

  7. Fuh K, Wang X, Tai A, et al. Intrauterine insemination: effect of the temporal relationship between the luteinizing hormone surge, human chorionic gonadotropin administration and insemination on pregnancy rates. Hum Reprod 1997;45:2162-66.

  8. Iberico G, Vioque J, Ariza N, Lozano JM, Roca M, Llacer J, et al. Analysis of factor influencing pregnancy rates in homologus intrauterine insemination. Fertil Steril 2004;81:1308-13.

  9. Huang F, Chang S, Lu Y, et al. Two different timings of intrauterine insemination for non-male infertility. J Assist Reprod Genet 2000;39:213-17.

  10. Ragni G, Maggioni P, Guermandi E, Testa A, Baron E, Colomb M, et al. Efficacy of double intrauterine insemination in controlled ovarian hyperstimulation cycles. Fertil Steril 1999;72:619-22.

  11. Calderon E, Rotschild E, Gilald M, Dirnfeld M, Ishai H. Single versus double intrauterine insemination (IUI) in cycles of controlled ovarian hyperstimulation + IUI for female factor infertility. Fertil Steril 2002;78(Suppl 2):123.

  12. Zeyneloglu HB, Arici A. A meta-analysis of double versus single intrauterine insemination (IUI) in homologus and donor insemination cycles. Fertil Steril 2001; 76(Suppl 1):116.

  13. Bisonette F, Sergiere M, Hamel A, Lapensee L, Benoit J, Belisle S. Pregnancy rates after double versus single insemination: a rendomized crossover study. Fertil Steril 2001;76(Suppl 1):192.

  14. Alborzi S, Shahdolikht M, Mohamad E, Parsanezhad E, Jammati S. Comparison of the effectiveness of single intrauterine insemination (IUI) vs double IUI per cycle in infertile patients. Fertil Steril 2003;80:595-99.




2020     |     www.medigraphic.com