medigraphic.com
ISSN 1561-2945 (Print)

2015, Number 2

<< Back Next >>

Revista Cubana de Cirugía 2015; 54 (2)

Esophageal motility study in patients with erosive esophagitis

Anido EV, Amable DT, Díaz DZ, Morera PM

Language: Spanish
References: 24
Page: 112-120
PDF size: 188.14 Kb.


ABSTRACT

Introduction: failed anti-reflux barrier allows the development of gastroesophageal reflux disease. The motility factors making up the anti-reflux barrier may be studied through the esophageal manometry.
Objective: to characterize motility factors in patients with erosive esophagitis by means of developed software and technologies.
Methods: a descriptive cross-sectional study was carried out in patients with erosive esophagitis by analyzing the motility factors through esophageal manometry.
Results: the resulting pattern showed unstable and hypotonic lower esophageal sphincter, significant frequency of hiatal hernia and severe esophageal motor disorders.
Conclusions: the main damage observed in the anti-reflux barrier occurs from the mildest degrees of the disease, without real association between this one and the degree of erosive esophagitis. The significant effect on peristalsis may be one of the elements leading to the onset of the disease.


REFERENCES

  1. Vakil N, van Zanten SV, Kahrilas P, Dent J, Jones R. Global Consensus Group. The Montreal definition and classification of gastroesophageal reflux disease: a global evidence based consensus. Am J Gastroenterol. 2006;101:1900–20.

  2. Brizuela RA. La función esofágica en sujetos sanos y en pacientes con enfermedades del esófago. Valoración manométrico-peachimétrica [Tesis para la obtención del grado científico de Doctor en Ciencias]. Ciudad Habana: Facultad Hospital “Luis Díaz Soto”, Instituto Superior de Ciencias Médicas “Victoria de Girón”;1989.

  3. Falcão A, Nasi A, Brandão J, Sallum R, Cecconello I. What is the real impairment on esophageal motility in patients with gastroesophageal reflux disease? Arq Gastroenterol. 2013;50(2):111-6.

  4. Martinucci I, de Bortoli N, Giacchino M, Bodini G, Marabotto E, Marchi S, et al. Esophageal motility abnormalities in gastroesophageal reflux disease. World J Gastrointest Pharmacol Ther. 2014;5(2):86-96.

  5. Falkenback D, Oberg S, Johson F, Johanson J. Is the course of gastroesophageal reflux disease progressive? A 21’year follow-up. Scand J Gastroenterol. 2009;44(11):1277-87.

  6. Lord RV, DeMeester SR, Peters JH, Hagen JA, Elyssnia D, Sheth CT, et al. Hiatal hernia, lower esophageal sphincter incompetence and effectiveness of Nissen fundoplication in the spectrum of gastroesophageal reflux disease. J Gastrointest Surg. 2009;13(4):602-10.

  7. Chen CL, Yi CH. Utility of esophageal impedance in identifying dysmotility in patients with erosive esophagitis. Dis Esophagus. 2008;21(6):539-43.

  8. Iwakiri K, Tanaka Y, Kawami N, Sano H, Sakamoto S. Pathophysiology of gastroesophageal reflux disease: motility factors. Nihon Rinsho. 2007;65(5):829-35.

  9. Koch OO, Kaindlstorfer A, Antoniou SA, Asche KU, Granderath FA, Pointner R. Influence of the esophageal hiatus size on the lower esophageal sphincter, on reflux activity and on symptomatology. Dis Esophagus. 2012;25(3):201-8.

  10. Rodríguez L, Rodríguez P, Neto MG, Ayala JC, Saba J, Berel D, et al. Short-term electrical stimulation of the lower esophageal sphincter increases sphincter pressure in patients with gastroesophageal reflux disease. Neurogastroenterol Motil. 2012;24(5):446-50.

  11. Grande M, Silero P, Attina GM, De Luca E, Ciano P, Ciangola CI, et al. Non erosive gastroesophageal reflux disease and mild degree of esophagitis: Comparison of symptoms, endoscopic, manometric and pH-metric patterns. W J Surg Oncology. 2012;10(84):1-6.

  12. Salvador R, Dubecz A, Polomsky M, Gellerson O, Jones CE, Raymond DP, et al. A new era in esophageal diagnostic: the image-based paradigm of high-resolution manometry. J Am Coll Surg. 2009;208(6):1033-44.

  13. Avazi S, Hagen JA, Zehetner J, Ross O, Wu C, Oezcelik A, et al. The value of high-resolution manometry in the assessment of the resting characteristics of the lower esophageal sphincter. J Gastrointest Sur. 2009;13(12):2113-20.

  14. Bredenoord AJ, Fox M, Kahrilas PJ, Pandolfino JE, Schwitzer W, Smout AJ. International High Resolution Manometry Working Group. Chicago classification criteria of esophageal motility disorders defined in high resolution esophageal pressure topography. Neurogastroenterol Motil. 2012;24(1):57-65.

  15. Valdovinos MA, Zavala-Solares ME, Coss-Adame E. Esophageal Hypomotility and Spastic Motor Disorders: Current Diagnosis and Treatment. Curr Gastroenterol Rep. 2014,16:421.

  16. Savarino E, Gemignami L, Pohl D, Zentilin P, Dulbecco P, Assandri L, et al. Oesophageal motility and bolus transit abnormalities increase in parallel with the severity of gastro-oesophageal reflux disease. Aliment Pharmacol Ther. 2011;34(4):476-86.

  17. Fornaris F, Callegari-Jacques SM, Scussel PJ, Madalosso LF, Barros EF. Is ineffective oesophageal motility associated with reflux esophagitis? Eur J Gastroenterol Hepatol. 2007;19(9):783-8.

  18. Gustchow CA, Leers JM, Schroder W, Prenzel KL, Fuchs H, Bollschweiler E, et al. Effect of aging on esophageal motility in patients with and without GERD. Ger Med Sci [Internet] 2011 [consultado 18 Ago 2011];9. Disponible en: http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3159207/

  19. Wang H, Tian Y, Ding Y. Esophageal motor function of gastroesophageal reflux disease. Zhonq Y Xue. 2010;32(4):465-9.

  20. Hani de Ardila A. Fisiopatología de la enfermedad por reflujo gastroesofágico. Rev Col Gastroenterol. 2009;24(1):87-94.

  21. Bresadola V, Adani GL, Londero F, Leo CA, Cherchi V, Lorenzin D, et al. Nonerosive and uncomplicated erosive reflux disease: Difference in physiopathological and symptoms pattern. W J Gastrointest Pathol. 2011;2(3):42-8.

  22. Pandolfino JE, Romans S. High-resolution manometry: an atlas of esophageal motility disorders and findings of GERD using esophageal pressure topography. Thorac Surg Clin. 2011;21(4):465-75.

  23. Maradey-Romero C, Gabbard S, Fass R. Treatment of esophageal motility disorders based on the Chicago Classification. Current Treatment Options in Gastroenterology. 2014,12:441-55.

  24. Soumekh A, Schnoll-Sussman FH, Katz PO. Reflux and acid peptic diseases in the elderly. Clin Geriatr Med. 2014,30:29-41.




2020     |     www.medigraphic.com