Leija EM, Jiménez NII, Macias ELK

Language: Spanish
References: 26
Page: 209-215
PDF size: 284.49 Kb.

ABSTRACT

Background In recent decades, research on families with psychopathology has demonstrated the relationship between childhood mental disorders and problems in the marital subsystem.
Objective To describe the degree of marital adjustment in a group of parents who sought psychiatric care for their children and compare it with the severity of the psychopathology present in children.
Method The study included a group of 48 children and 76 parents. The children’s psychopathology was assessed using the MINI-Kid, while their parents’ degree of dyadic adjustment was evaluated through the Dyadic Adjustment Scale (EAD-13).
Results A total of 72.9% of the children had at least one parent who reported a low dyadic adjustment. The EAD-13 scores of each member of the couple showed low correlation (p‹ 0.05). Moreover, there was a negative correlation (p‹ 0.05) between the EAD-13 scores answered by the mothers (the lower the score, the lower the adjustment) and the number of diagnoses present in the children. However, a comparison of the means of the number of diagnoses present in the children, according to the degree of adjustment perceived by the fathers, showed that those with a high adjustment had children with a higher number of psychiatric diagnoses (p‹ 0.05).
Discussion and conclusion The results suggest that denied or concealed conflict, at least by the father, and marital difficulties perceived by the mother, led to children’s increased susceptibility to psychopathology.
Ignoring marital conflict in the assessment of children and adolescents has huge implications in the evolution, prognosis and response to treatment of pediatric patients.

REFERENCES

1. Bateson G, Jackson DD, Haley J, Weakland J. Toward a Theory of Schizophrenia. Behavioral Science 1956; 1(4):251-264.

2. Bateson G. Steps to an ecology of mind; collected essays in anthropology, psychiatry, evolution, and epistemology. San Francisco: Chandler Publishing Company; 1972.

3. Minuchin S. Families and family therapy. Massachusetts: Harvard University Press; 1974.

4. Minuchin S, Rosman BL, Baker L. Psychosomatic families; anorexia nervosa in context. Massachusetts: Harvard University Press; 1978.

5. Selvini-Palazzoli M, Boscolo L, Cecchin G, Prata G. Paradox and counterparadox; a new model in the therapy of the family in schizophrenic transaction. New York: Jason Aronson; 1978.

6. Ajuriaguerra Jd. Manuel de psychiatrie de l’enfant. París: Masson; 1970.

7. Marcelli D, Ajuriaguerra Jd. Psychopathologie de l’enfant. Segunda edición. París: Masson; 1984.

8. King CA, Radpour LN, Michael W, Segal HG, Jouriles EN. Parents’ marital functioning and adolescent psychotherapy. J Consult Clin Psychol 1995; 63(5): 749-753.

9. Nomura Y, Wickramaratne PJ, Warner V, Mufson L, Weissman MM. Family discord, parental depression, and psychopathology in offspring: tenyear follow-up. J Am Acad Child Adolesc Psychiatry 2002; 41(4): 402-409.

10. Cabrera VE, Guevara IP, Barrera F. Relaciones maritales, relaciones paternas y su influencia en el ajuste psicológico de los hijos. Acta Colombiana de Psicología 2006; 9(2): 115-126.

11. Day RD, Hair E, Moore KA, Kaye K, Orthner DK. Marital quality and outcomes for children and adolescents: a review of the family process literature. Washington, DC: The office of the assistant secretary for planning and evaluation; 2009.

12. Spanier GB. Measuring dyadic adjustment: new scales for assessing the quality of marriage and similar dyads. J Marriage Fam 1976; 38(1): 15-28.

13. Spanier GB. Improve, refine, recast, expand, clarify: don’t abandon. J Marriage Fam 1985; 47(4):1073-1074.

14. Josephson AM, AACAP Work Group. Practice Parameter for the Assessment of the Family. J Am Acad Child Adolesc Psychiatry 2007; 46(7):922-937.

15. Sheehan D, Lecrubier Y, Harnett-Sheehan K et al. The Mini-International Neuropsychiatric Interview (M.I.N.I.): the development and validation of a structured diagnostic psychiatric interview for DSMIV and ICD-10. J Clin Psychiatry 1998; 59(supl 20):22-33.

16. Sheehan D, Lecrubier Y, Harnett-Sheehan K et al. Reliability and validity of the MINI International Neuropsychiatric Interview (MINI): According to the SCID-P. European Psychiatry 1997;12: 232-241.

17. Lecrubier Y, Sheehan D, Weiller E. The Mini International Neuropsychiatric Interview (MINI). A short diagnostic structured interview: reliability and validity according to the CIDI. European Psychiatry 1997; 12: 224-231.

18. Santos-Iglesias P, Vallejo-Medina P, Sierra J. Propiedades psicométricas de una versión breve de la Escala de Ajuste Diádico en muestras españolas. Int J Clin Health Psychol 2009; 9(3): 501-517.

19. Moral de la Rubia J. Estudio de validación de la Escala de Ajuste Diádico (DAS) en población Mexicana. Revista Internacional de Ciencias Sociales y Humanidades, SOCIOTAM 2009; 19(1): 113-138.

20. Rosenfield S. Gender and dimensions of the self: Implications for internalizing and externalizing behavior. En: Frank E (ed). Gender and its effects on psychopathology. Arlington, VA: American Psychiatric Publishing; 2000.

21. Martel MM. Sexual selection and sex differences in the prevalence of childhood externalizing and adolescent internalizing disorders. Psychol Bull 2013; 139(6): 1221-1259.

22. Gaub M, Carlson CL. Gender differences in ADHD: a meta-analysis and critical review. J Am Acad Child Adolesc Psychiatry 1997; 36(8): 1036-1045.

23. Vallina O, Lemos S. Dos décadas de intervenciones familiares en la esquizofrenia. Psicothema 2000; 12(4): 671-681.

24. Jung CG. Psychologie und Erziehung. Zürich: Rascher Verlag; 1950.

25. Sauceda JM, Maldonado JM. La Familia: su dinámica y tratamiento. Washington: Organización Panamericana de la Salud; 2003.

26. Minuchin S, Fishman HC. Family therapy techniques. Massachusetts: Harvard University Press; 1981.