medigraphic.com
ISSN 0016-3813 (Print)

2015, Number 3

<< Back Next >>

Gac Med Mex 2015; 151 (3)

Comparison of participative educative strategy versus traditional educative strategy in health personnel

Barrera LJC, Barajas-Serrano TL, Jiménez-Hernández JE, Barrera-López E, González-Bernal C, Higareda-Almaraz MA

Language: Spanish
References: 20
Page: 369-376
PDF size: 219.89 Kb.


ABSTRACT

Objective: To compare the clinical aptitude in neonatal resuscitation with participative educative strategy versus traditional educative strategy in health personnel. Material and Methods: Quasi-experimental study design including physicians and nurses distributed in two groups: (i) participative educative strategies n = 156, and (ii) traditional n = 158, were imparted in 12 sessions. Evaluation of clinical aptitude evaluated with validated questionnaire. Descriptive and interferential statistical interand intragroup. Results: Clinical aptitude median score before/after: participative educative strategy 25.0/36.5 (p = 0.000) and traditional 24.5/31.0 (p = 0.000); differences between intergroup p = 0.040. Changes to higher category according to the score before/after in participative 114 (73%) vs. traditional 65 (41%); p = 0.010. There were no significant differences in the intergroup results in the category of evaluation of clinical aptitude, but there were differences in the intragroup when we evaluated median before and after with both strategies. Conclusions: Increase of clinical aptitude in neonatal resuscitation in health personnel, with both educative strategies being higher with participative strategy.


REFERENCES

  1. Sánchez CR, Cuentas R, Carreño J. Reanimación cardiopulmonar avanzada en pediatría. Conceptos generales y prevención. CCAP [consultado 12 diciembre 2013];6(4):38-49. Disponible en: http://www.scp.com. co/precop/precop_files/modulo_6_vin_4/Reanimacion_cardiopulmonar_ basica_en_Pediatria.pdf

  2. Ponce de León NC, Ponce de León NR. Evaluación del nivel de conocimientos relacionados con la reanimación cardiopulmonar neonatal de profesionales y técnicos. Cárdenas. Revista médica electrónica 2009 [consultado diciembre 2013];31(5). Disponible en: http://scielo.sld.cu/ scielo.php?pid=S168418242009000500004&script=sci_arttext

  3. American Academy of Pediatrics. Reanimación neonatal. 5.a ed. 2006; 2-3.

  4. Lara BI, Rojas CS. Capacitación sobre reanimación cardiopulmonar básica a personal de enfermería por criterios de conocimiento, aptitud y actitud. Rev Enferm IMSS 2004;12:147-51.

  5. Flores CJ, Cruz F, Orozco G, et al. Hipoxia perinatal y su impacto en el neurodesarrollo. Rev Chil Neuropsicol 2013;8(1):26-31.

  6. Comunicado de prensa conjunto OMS/Save the Children GINEBRA: 2011. Disminuye la mortalidad neonatal, pero aumenta su proporción en la mortalidad en la niñez a escala mundial [consultado 27 septiembre 2013]. Disponible en: http://www.who.int/mediacentre/news/releases/2011/ newborn_deaths_20110830/es/

  7. Rodríguez LM, Rueda MJ. Aprendizaje de la guía de reanimación cardiopulmonar. Rev Med Inst Mex Seguro Soc 2008;46:3-10.

  8. Higareda AM, Higareda AE, Higareda AI, et al. Aptitud de padres para prevenir abuso sexual en menores después de una intervención educativa participativa. Salud Pública Mex 2011;53:134-40.

  9. Viniegra L, Jiménez J. Nuevas aproximaciones a la medición de la competencia clínica. Rev Invest Clin 1992;44:269-75.

  10. Trujillo F, González R, Murguía C. Competencia clínica en diabetes mellitus. Rev Med IMSS 2002;40:467-72.

  11. Peredo RP, Gómez LV. Impacto de una estrategia educativa activa participativa en el control de la hipertensión arterial. Rev Med IMSS 2005; 43:125-9.

  12. Velasco RV, Martínez OV, Roiz HJ, et al. Cálculo de tamaño de muestra para estudios comparativos con dos proporciones. En: Muestreo y tamaño de muestra. Ed. e-libro.net. 1.ª ed., Buenos Aires, Argentina, 2003, pp. 51-2.

  13. Betancourt FC, Medina FA. Aptitud clínica en el cuidado enfermero ante el neonato grave: intervención de una estrategia educativa. Rev Enferm Inst Mex Seguro Soc 2007;15:79-83.

  14. Surcouf JW, Chauvin SW, Ferry J, et al. Enhancing residents neonatal resuscitation competency through unannounced simulation-based training. Med Educ Online 2013;18:18726.

  15. Amin HJ, Aziz K, Halamek LP, et al. Simulation based learning combined with debriefing: trainers satisfaction with a new approach to training the trainers to teach neonatal resuscitation. BMC Res Notes 2013; 6:251.

  16. Curran V, Fleet L, White S, et al. A randomized controlled study of manikin simulator fidelity on neonatal resuscitation program learning outcomes. Adv in Healt Sci Educ 2014; DOI 10.1007/s10459-014- 9522-8.

  17. Halamek LP, Kaegi DM, Gaba DM, et al. Time for a new paradigm in pediatric medical education: teaching neonatal resuscitation in a simulated delivery room environment. Pediatrics 2000;106:1-6.

  18. Thomas EJ, Taggart B , Crandell S, et al. Teaching teamwork during the Neonatal Resuscitation Program: a randomized trial. J Perinatol 2007;27:409-14.

  19. Thomas EJ, Sexton JB, Lasky RE, et al. Teamwork and quality during neonatal care in the delivery room. J Perinatol 2006;26:163–9.

  20. Halameck LP. Educational Perspectives: The Genesis, Adaptation, and Evolution of the Neonatal Resuscitation Program. Neoreviews 2008;9:141-9.




2020     |     www.medigraphic.com