Montes OAE, García ERM, Bernal GMJ, Pérez RC

Language: Spanish
References: 18
Page: 100-107
PDF size: 78.63 Kb.

ABSTRACT

In order to find out the difference in efficacy for mycrobiologic agent analysis of patients, suffering of vaginal infection: ADN waves versus microbiologic analysis of vaginal fresh material based on Nuget criteria were assayed. Sixty five patients who attended to the laboratory for analysis of the exudates from the vagina fundus were included in this study. Exudate sample from the vagina was taken with no lubricant throughout cotton or dracon swab. The smear of the exudates were Gram stainned to microscopically identify: Candida, Thrichomonas, Gardnerella and clue cells. Samples were stripped in Agar Casman. Once the colonies had appeared, those which resulted suspicious for Candida were restripped in Nickerson media. For pathogenic Candida differentiation, a filamentous serum test was assayed. Findings of this search resulted as follows: Nine samples had Candida (13.8%); 4 (6.1%) were pathogenic and 5 (6.5%) were not. One sample had Trichomonas (1.5%). Twenty six had Gardnerella (40%) and twenty nine were negative for mycrobiologic identification. Analysis with the DNA waves technique resulted as follows: Trichomonas vaginalis 1 (1.5%), Gardnerella vaginalis 26 (40.0%) and 38 were negative (58.5%)

REFERENCES

1. Hope KH. Current evaluation and management of vulvovaginitis. Obstet Gynecol Clin N Am 1999; 42: 184-95.

2. Rivera RL. Prevalencia de vaginitis y vaginosis bacteriana: asociación con manifestaciones clínicas, de laboratorio y tratamiento. Ginecol Obstet Mex 1996; 66: 26-35.

3. Sobel JD. Vulvovaginitis candidiásica. Obstet Gynecol Clin North Am 1993; 1: 153-163.

4. Flores RE, Casanova RG. Vaginosis bacteriana. Relación de la flora vaginal con las células epiteliales de vagina, con diferente tratamiento. Estudio ultraestructural. Ginecol Obstet Mex 1999; 65: 182-190.

5. Ries AS. Treatment of vaginal infections:candidiasis, bacterial vaginosis and trichomoniasis. J Am Pharmacol Assoc 1997; 37: 563-569.

6. Carr PL, Felsenstein D, Friedman RH. Evaluation and management of vaginitis. J General Int Med 13: 335-46

7. Jack D, Sobel MD. Vaginitis. New Engl J Med 1997; 25: 1896-1903.

8. Gaves A, Gardner W. Patogenicidad de Trichomonas, vaginalis. Obstet Ginecol Clin N Am 1993; 1: 145-151.

9. Herne P, Mc Gregor J. Trichomonas vaginalis, microorganismo patógeno que resurge. Obstet Ginecol Clin N Am 1993; 1: 135-143.

10. Petrin D, Delgaty K, Bhatt R, Garber G. Clinical and microbiological aspects os Trichomonas vaginalis. Clin Microbiol Rew 1998; 1: 300-317.

11. Waghorn DT, Tucker PK. Collaborative approach, to approve the detection and management of microbiologically confirmed. Int J STD AIDS 1998; 9: 164-167.

12. Ohlemey C, Hornberg LL. Diagnosis of Trichomonas vaginalis in adolescent females: In Pouch TV culture versus wet-mount microscopy. Jadol Heatl 1998; 22: 205-208.

13. Manoj KB. Vaginosis bacteriana. Obstet Ginecol Clin N Am 1993; 1: 165-74.

14. Monterosa A, Castro, Blanquicet AL. Gardnerella vaginalis en informes de citología cervicovaginal. Gac Med Mex 132: 119-125.

15. Davis JD, Connor EE. Correlation between cervical cytologyc results and Gram stain as diagnostics for bacterial vaginosis. Am J Obstet Gynecol 1997; 177: 532-535.

16. Janes RS, Hillier S-L. Validity of the vaginal Gram stain for diagnosis of bacterial vaginosis. Obstet Gynecol 1996; 88: 573-576.

17. Sistema para identificación microbiana Affirm VPIII de Beckton Dickinson.

18. López MR, Méndez TLJ, Hernández HR, Castañon OR. Micosis oportunistas en Micología Médica. Procedimientos para el Diagnóstico de Laboratorio 1995: 99-129.